Suppr超能文献

昏迷初始诊断的准确性:835 例非创伤性意识障碍患者的观察性研究。

The accuracy of initial diagnoses in coma: an observational study in 835 patients with non-traumatic disorder of consciousness.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 12;29(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00822-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Management of patients with coma of unknown etiology (CUE) is a major challenge in most emergency departments (EDs). CUE is associated with a high mortality and a wide variety of pathologies that require differential therapies. A suspected diagnosis issued by pre-hospital emergency care providers often drives the first approach to these patients. We aim to determine the accuracy and value of the initial diagnostic hypothesis in patients with CUE.

METHODS

Consecutive ED patients presenting with CUE were prospectively enrolled. We obtained the suspected diagnoses or working hypotheses from standardized reports given by prehospital emergency care providers, both paramedics and emergency physicians. Suspected and final diagnoses were classified into I) acute primary brain lesions, II) primary brain pathologies without acute lesions and III) pathologies that affected the brain secondarily. We compared suspected and final diagnosis with percent agreement and Cohen's Kappa including sub-group analyses for paramedics and physicians. Furthermore, we tested the value of suspected and final diagnoses as predictors for mortality with binary logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Overall, suspected and final diagnoses matched in 62% of 835 enrolled patients. Cohen's Kappa showed a value of κ = .415 (95% CI .361-.469, p < .005). There was no relevant difference in diagnostic accuracy between paramedics and physicians. Suspected diagnoses did not significantly interact with in-hospital mortality (e.g., suspected class I: OR .982, 95% CI .518-1.836) while final diagnoses interacted strongly (e.g., final class I: OR 5.425, 95% CI 3.409-8.633).

CONCLUSION

In cases of CUE, the suspected diagnosis is unreliable, regardless of different pre-hospital care providers' qualifications. It is not an appropriate decision-making tool as it neither sufficiently predicts the final diagnosis nor detects the especially critical comatose patient. To avoid the risk of mistriage and unnecessarily delayed therapy, we advocate for a standardized diagnostic work-up for all CUE patients that should be triggered by the emergency symptom alone and not by any suspected diagnosis.

摘要

背景

对病因不明昏迷(CUE)患者的管理是大多数急诊科(ED)的主要挑战。CUE 患者死亡率高,且可能涉及多种需要不同治疗方法的病理情况。院前急救提供者的疑似诊断通常会影响对这些患者的初始治疗。本研究旨在确定 CUE 患者初始诊断假设的准确性和价值。

方法

连续纳入以 CUE 就诊的 ED 患者。我们从院前急救提供者(包括护理人员和急诊医生)提供的标准化报告中获得疑似诊断或初步假设。疑似和最终诊断分为 I) 急性原发性脑损伤,II) 无急性损伤的原发性脑病变和 III) 继发性影响大脑的病变。我们通过百分比一致性和 Cohen's Kappa 比较疑似和最终诊断,包括对护理人员和医生的亚组分析。此外,我们还使用二元逻辑回归模型测试疑似和最终诊断作为死亡率预测因子的价值。

结果

总体而言,835 例纳入患者中,疑似和最终诊断相符者占 62%。Cohen's Kappa 值为 κ=0.415(95%CI:0.361-0.469,p<0.005)。护理人员和医生的诊断准确性无显著差异。疑似诊断与院内死亡率无显著交互作用(例如,疑似 I 类:OR 0.982,95%CI 0.518-1.836),而最终诊断具有很强的交互作用(例如,最终 I 类:OR 5.425,95%CI 3.409-8.633)。

结论

在 CUE 情况下,疑似诊断不可靠,与不同院前急救提供者的资质无关。它不是一个合适的决策工具,因为它既不能充分预测最终诊断,也不能检测到特别危急的昏迷患者。为了避免分诊错误和不必要的治疗延误,我们主张对所有 CUE 患者进行标准化诊断评估,该评估应由紧急症状触发,而不是任何疑似诊断触发。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a82/7805149/46fea8bc7357/13049_2020_822_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验