School of Public health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa
School of Public health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):e043452. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043452.
Healthcare seekers around the globe use more than one healthcare system, with most using the traditional and the Western approaches concurrently. To date, little collaboration between the two systems has taken place within the mental health space compared with other areas of medicine. In order to inform integrating plans for traditional health practitioners and biomedical health practitioners in the South African mental health system, it is important to know which models of collaboration are used in other medical settings and contexts. This study aims to document global evidence on collaboration practices between traditional health practitioners and biomedical professionals when working with various health conditions.
This scoping review will be guided by an improved Arksey and O'Malley framework, the 2010 Levac methodological framework and the 2017 Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. A systematic literature search will be carried out using seven different databases, EMBASE, PubMed, LILACS MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, CINAHL Plus, Academic Search Complete and Scopus, in addition to the WHO repository, bibliographical search engines, and Open Access Theses and Dissertations. Moreover, the references of relevant publications between January 1978 and March 2020 will be scanned. Two reviewers will independently screen articles for eligibility based on the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thematic analysis and descriptive numerical analysis will be performed using ATLAS.ti V.8 and Excel software, respectively. The results for this review will be presented using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Extension for Scoping Review.
This study will not require ethics approval because publicly available material will be used. Study findings will be published in an open-access journal and be presented to other key health system stakeholders and academic research gatherings.
全球各地的医疗保健寻求者使用的医疗系统不止一个,大多数人同时使用传统和西方方法。迄今为止,与医学的其他领域相比,这两种系统在精神卫生领域几乎没有进行过合作。为了为南非精神卫生系统中的传统卫生保健从业者和生物医学保健从业者的整合计划提供信息,了解在其他医疗环境和背景下使用哪些合作模式非常重要。本研究旨在记录全球范围内传统卫生保健从业者与生物医学专业人员在处理各种健康状况时合作实践的证据。
本范围综述将遵循改进的 Arksey 和 O'Malley 框架、2010 年 Levac 方法框架和 2017 年 Joanna Briggs 研究所指南。将使用七种不同的数据库,即 EMBASE、PubMed、LILACS MEDLINE、APA PsycArticles、CINAHL Plus、Academic Search Complete 和 Scopus,以及世界卫生组织资源库、书目搜索引擎和开放获取论文和学位论文,进行系统文献检索。此外,还将扫描 1978 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月期间相关出版物的参考文献。两名评审员将根据预定的纳入和排除标准独立筛选文章的资格。将使用 ATLAS.ti V.8 和 Excel 软件分别进行主题分析和描述性数值分析。本综述的结果将使用系统评价和荟萃分析的扩展报告首选项目呈现。
本研究不需要伦理批准,因为将使用公开可用的材料。研究结果将发表在开放获取期刊上,并提交给其他关键卫生系统利益相关者和学术研究会议。