Kumar Nimmagadda R R, Jonnavithula Nirmala, Padhy Shibani, Sanapala Virinchi, Naik Vadithe Vasram
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;64(10):874-879. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_235_20. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
The process of laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation is associated with intense sympathetic activity, which may precipitate intra-operative complications. Taking the advantage of dexmedetomidine's good bioavailability and rapid absorption through nasal mucosa; we contemplated this study to evaluate the effects of nebulised dexmedetomidine as a premedication in blunting the haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.
This prospective, randomised, comparative study was conducted in 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I, II patients. The primary outcome was to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine nebulisation in blunting the stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation. The secondary outcome was to study its adverse effects. The study population was divided randomly into two groups. Control group C ( = 50) received nebulisation with 5 ml of normal saline and group D ( = 50) received 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine 5 ml 10 min before induction in sitting position.
Demographics were comparable. Following laryngoscopy and intubation, systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP), response entropy (RE) and state entropy (SE) were markedly increased in the control group whereas in group D there was a fall in SBP (at 1 min-126.64 ± 26.37; 0.01, 5 min-109.50 ± 16.83; 0.02, 10 min-106.94 ± 17.01; 0.03), DBP (at 1 min-83.18 ± 17.89; 0.001, 5 min-66.40 ± 13.88; 0.001, 10 min- 62.56 ± 14.91; 0.01) and MAP (at 1 min-99.68 ± 19.22; 0.001, 5 min- 84.08 ± 13.66; 0.003, 10 min- 81.74 ± 14.79; 0.008), RE and SE which was statistically significant ( 0.002). There was a dose sparing effect of propofol in group D; sedation score was comparable.
Nebulised dexmedetomidine effectively blunts the stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation with no adverse effects.
喉镜检查和气管插管过程会引发强烈的交感神经活动,这可能导致术中并发症。鉴于右美托咪定具有良好的生物利用度且能通过鼻黏膜快速吸收,我们开展了本研究,以评估雾化吸入右美托咪定作为术前用药对减轻喉镜检查和气管插管时血流动力学反应的效果。
本前瞻性、随机、对照研究纳入了100例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I级和II级的患者。主要结局是评估雾化吸入右美托咪定对减轻喉镜检查和插管应激反应的效果。次要结局是研究其不良反应。研究对象被随机分为两组。对照组C(n = 50)接受5 ml生理盐水雾化吸入,D组(n = 50)在诱导前10分钟坐位时接受1 μg/kg右美托咪定5 ml雾化吸入。
两组患者的人口统计学特征具有可比性。喉镜检查和插管后,对照组的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和平均动脉压(MAP)、反应熵(RE)和状态熵(SE)均显著升高,而D组的SBP(1分钟时为126.64 ± 26.37;P < 0.01,5分钟时为109.50 ± 16.83;P < 0.02,10分钟时为106.94 ± 17.01;P < 0.03)、DBP(1分钟时为83.18 ± 17.89;P < 0.001,5分钟时为66.40 ± 13.88;P < 0.001,10分钟时为62.56 ± 14.91;P < 0.01)和MAP(1分钟时为99.68 ± 19.22;P < 0.001,5分钟时为84.08 ± 13.66;P < 0.003,10分钟时为81.74 ± 14.79;P < 0.008)、RE和SE均下降,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.002)。D组丙泊酚的用量减少,镇静评分相当。
雾化吸入右美托咪定可有效减轻喉镜检查和插管的应激反应,且无不良反应。