Sandhu Jasmesh, Sharma Hemant, Jabr Yamen, Sidaginamale Raghavendra, Logishetty Rajanikanth, Cooke Nick, Brewster Nigel
Trauma and Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, TS19 8PE, UK.
Undergraduate Medical Education Department, Ipswich Hospital, East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Dec 29;61:110-114. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.032. eCollection 2021 Jan.
The objectives of this study conducted in the University Hospital of North Tees, UK were to: (i) Identify if the current hip arthroplasty documentation met good compliance with the Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) hip arthroplasty guidance (ii) Improve current documentation with a transition from hand-written notes to an online typed personalised operative hip arthroplasty template (iii) Improve the quality of documentation and adherence to GIRFT guidance in hip arthroplasty.
We led a team of 7 doctors to review University Hospital of North Tees compliance against 24 criteria laid out by GIRFT. After examining 20 operative records retrospectively at random from a spread of orthopaedic consultants in the department, it was shown that there was poor compliance against GIRFT guidelines. We proposed a pragmatic solution of incorporating a pre-populated hip arthroplasty online template adhering to GIRFT guidance into our local 'Trackcare' system. Following that, we closed the audit loop by prospectively reviewing 20 operative notes.
Our initial results showed that poor compliance ranging 0%-100% over the 24 criteria. The findings of the 24 criteria with the online hip arthroplasty template in place showed a significant improvement between 80 and 100% compliance over the 24 criteria.
The majority of the issues identified are modifiable risks factors which were amenable to some simple pragmatic solutions. A review of a single surgeon template has shown that it is simple to use, has excellent compliance (has pre-populated 24 criteria), takes 6-7 min to complete the operative notes, easily auditable and thus appears promising in minimising medico-legal claims for surgeons and the Trust.
在英国北蒂斯大学医院开展的这项研究的目的是:(i)确定当前髋关节置换术的文档记录是否很好地符合“一次做对”(GIRFT)髋关节置换术指南;(ii)通过从手写笔记过渡到在线键入的个性化手术髋关节置换术模板来改进当前的文档记录;(iii)提高髋关节置换术文档记录的质量并遵守GIRFT指南。
我们带领一个由7名医生组成的团队,根据GIRFT列出的24条标准,审查北蒂斯大学医院的合规情况。在从该科室的骨科顾问中随机回顾性检查20份手术记录后,发现对GIRFT指南的合规性较差。我们提出了一个务实的解决方案,即将遵循GIRFT指南的预填充髋关节置换术在线模板纳入我们当地的“Trackcare”系统。之后,我们通过前瞻性审查20份手术记录来闭合审计循环。
我们的初步结果显示,在24条标准上的合规性较差,范围在0%至100%之间。采用在线髋关节置换术模板后,24条标准的结果显示合规性有了显著提高,在24条标准上的合规率在80%至100%之间。
所发现的大多数问题都是可改变的风险因素,适合采用一些简单务实的解决方案。对单个外科医生模板的审查表明,它使用简单,具有出色的合规性(已预填充24条标准),完成手术记录需要6至7分钟,易于审计,因此在将外科医生和医院信托面临的医疗法律索赔降至最低方面似乎很有前景。