• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
When Precision Meets Penmanship: ChatGPT and Surgery Documentation.当精准遇上书法:ChatGPT与手术记录
Cureus. 2023 Jun 17;15(6):e40546. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40546. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Artificial intelligence in orthopaedics: can Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) pass Section 1 of the Fellowship of the Royal College of Surgeons (Trauma & Orthopaedics) examination?人工智能在骨科领域的应用:ChatGPT 能否通过皇家外科学院(创伤与骨科)研究员资格 Section 1 考试?
Postgrad Med J. 2023 Sep 21;99(1176):1110-1114. doi: 10.1093/postmj/qgad053.
3
Using ChatGPT-4 to Create Structured Medical Notes From Audio Recordings of Physician-Patient Encounters: Comparative Study.利用 ChatGPT-4 从医患对话的音频记录中创建结构化的医疗记录:比较研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 22;26:e54419. doi: 10.2196/54419.
4
ChatGPT in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.整形与重建外科中的ChatGPT
Indian J Plast Surg. 2023 Aug 2;56(4):320-325. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771514. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Exploring the Boundaries of Reality: Investigating the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence Hallucination in Scientific Writing Through ChatGPT References.探索现实的边界:通过ChatGPT参考文献研究科学写作中的人工智能幻觉现象。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 11;15(4):e37432. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37432. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Performance and exploration of ChatGPT in medical examination, records and education in Chinese: Pave the way for medical AI.ChatGPT 在中文体检、病历和教育方面的表现和探索:为医疗 AI 铺平道路。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Sep;177:105173. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105173. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
7
ChatGPT's Ability to Assess Quality and Readability of Online Medical Information: Evidence From a Cross-Sectional Study.ChatGPT评估在线医学信息质量和可读性的能力:一项横断面研究的证据。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 20;15(7):e42214. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42214. eCollection 2023 Jul.
8
Does the Information Quality of ChatGPT Meet the Requirements of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery?ChatGPT的信息质量是否符合骨科与创伤外科的要求?
Cureus. 2024 May 15;16(5):e60318. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60318. eCollection 2024 May.
9
Performance of ChatGPT on NASS Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Comparison Study.ChatGPT 在 NASS 腰痛诊断和治疗临床指南中的表现:一项对比研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 May 1;49(9):640-651. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004915. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
10
An audit to identify adherence of laparoscopic appendicectomy operation notes to Royal College of Surgeons Good Surgical Practice standards.一项审计,旨在确定腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术记录是否符合皇家外科学院的良好手术实践标准。
Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Apr;191(2):825-830. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02567-6. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence (AI) - Powered Documentation Systems in Healthcare: A Systematic Review.医疗保健领域中由人工智能驱动的文档系统:一项系统综述
J Med Syst. 2025 Feb 18;49(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02157-4.
2
The Utility and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence-Powered Chatbots in Healthcare.人工智能驱动的聊天机器人在医疗保健中的效用与局限性
Cureus. 2024 Nov 6;16(11):e73127. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73127. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Applications and Concerns of ChatGPT and Other Conversational Large Language Models in Health Care: Systematic Review.ChatGPT 及其他会话型大型语言模型在医疗保健中的应用及关注:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 7;26:e22769. doi: 10.2196/22769.
4
A Systematic Review of ChatGPT and Other Conversational Large Language Models in Healthcare.ChatGPT及其他对话式大语言模型在医疗保健领域的系统评价
medRxiv. 2024 Apr 27:2024.04.26.24306390. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.26.24306390.
5
Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Abdominopelvic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Applications and Impact.人工智能和 ChatGPT 在腹盆腔手术中的应用及影响的系统评价
In Vivo. 2024 May-Jun;38(3):1009-1015. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13534.

本文引用的文献

1
ChatGPT: the future of discharge summaries?ChatGPT:出院小结的未来?
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Mar;5(3):e107-e108. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00021-3. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
2
Impact of intrawork rest breaks on doctors' performance and well-being: systematic review.工作内休息对医生绩效和健康的影响:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 14;12(12):e062469. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062469.
3
An audit to identify adherence of laparoscopic appendicectomy operation notes to Royal College of Surgeons Good Surgical Practice standards.一项审计,旨在确定腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术记录是否符合皇家外科学院的良好手术实践标准。
Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Apr;191(2):825-830. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02567-6. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

当精准遇上书法:ChatGPT与手术记录

When Precision Meets Penmanship: ChatGPT and Surgery Documentation.

作者信息

Robinson Alexander, Aggarwal Shaurya

机构信息

General Surgery, Mid and South Essex NHS (National Health Service) Foundation Trust, Chelmsford, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jun 17;15(6):e40546. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40546. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.40546
PMID:37465809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10350653/
Abstract

ChatGPT (Chatbot Generative Pre-Trained Transformer) is an artificial intelligence with several potential applications in the field of medicine. As a large language model, it is particularly good at generating text. This study investigates the use of ChatGPT in constructing operation notes for laparoscopic appendicectomy, one of the most common surgical procedures in the UK. We prompted ChatGPT-4, the latest generation of ChatGPT, to produce operation notes for laparoscopic appendicectomy, which were then evaluated against 'Getting It Right First Time' (GIRFT) recommendations. GIRFT is an organisation that has collaborated with the National Health Service (NHS) to improve surgical documentation guidelines. Excluding certain items documented elsewhere in patient records, the generated notes were assessed against 30 key points in GIRFT recommendations. This process was repeated three times to obtain an average score. Our results showed that ChatGPT generated operation notes in seconds, with an average coverage of 78.8% (23.66 out of 30 points) of the GIRFT guidelines, surpassing average compliance with similar guidelines from the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS). However, the quality of ChatGPT's output was found to be dependent on the quality of the prompt, highlighting the need for verification of the generated content. Additionally, secure integration with electronic health records is required before ChatGPT can be adopted into the NHS.

摘要

ChatGPT(聊天机器人生成式预训练变换器)是一种人工智能,在医学领域有多种潜在应用。作为一个大型语言模型,它特别擅长生成文本。本研究调查了ChatGPT在构建腹腔镜阑尾切除术手术记录中的应用,腹腔镜阑尾切除术是英国最常见的外科手术之一。我们促使最新一代的ChatGPT-4生成腹腔镜阑尾切除术的手术记录,然后根据“首次正确执行”(GIRFT)的建议对其进行评估。GIRFT是一个与英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)合作以改进手术记录指南的组织。排除患者记录中其他地方记录的某些项目后,根据GIRFT建议中的30个关键点对生成的记录进行评估。这个过程重复了三次以获得平均分。我们的结果显示,ChatGPT在数秒内生成了手术记录,平均涵盖了GIRFT指南中78.8%(30分中的23.66分)的内容,超过了皇家外科医学院(RCS)类似指南的平均合规率。然而,发现ChatGPT输出的质量取决于提示的质量,这突出了对生成内容进行核实的必要性。此外,在ChatGPT能够被NHS采用之前,需要与电子健康记录进行安全集成。