Suppr超能文献

10至12岁儿童中可咀嚼牙刷的牙菌斑清除效率:一项随机对照试验

Plaque Removal Efficiency of Chewable Toothbrushes among 10-12-yearold Children: A Randomized Control Trial.

作者信息

Nekkanti Sridhar, Kaur Kanwardeep, Balagopal Shwetha, Agarwal Priyanka

机构信息

Department of Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Department of Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Melaka, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Nov 24;10(6):759-765. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_339_20. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

Toothbrushing is one of the most important factors in controlling plaque accumulation and dental caries. There are vast varieties of toothbrushes available in the market. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of novel chewable toothbrushes as compared to manual toothbrushes in plaque removal among 10-12-year-old children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 40 healthy children aged between 10 and 12 years of age who were randomly assigned to either of the groups: Group I--Chewable Toothbrushes and Group II--Manual Toothbrushes. Following oral prophylaxis, baseline records of oral hygiene indices (Simplified oral hygiene index (OHI-S) in indexed teeth and Turesky modification of Quigley Hein plaque index (TMQHI) were taken. Baseline Saliva samples were collected and sent for counts. Children were then instructed to use their respective toothbrush twice daily for a week. Oral hygiene indices and counts were repeated after 1 week.

RESULTS

Differences in pre-brushing and post-brushing plaque scores and salivary counts were statistically significant when compared using paired-sample test and independent-sample test. There was a significant reduction in salivary counts after using both chewable and manual toothbrushes. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups ( = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

Chewable toothbrushes are equally effective in plaque control when compared to manual toothbrushes. These can be a reliable alternative for children who lack manual dexterity.

摘要

目的与目标

刷牙是控制牙菌斑积聚和龋齿的最重要因素之一。市场上有各种各样的牙刷。本研究旨在评估新型可咀嚼牙刷与手动牙刷相比,在10至12岁儿童中去除牙菌斑的效果。

材料与方法

本随机对照试验对40名年龄在10至12岁之间的健康儿童进行,他们被随机分配到以下两组之一:第一组——可咀嚼牙刷组和第二组——手动牙刷组。在进行口腔预防后,记录索引牙的口腔卫生指数(简化口腔卫生指数(OHI-S))和Turesky改良的Quigley Hein菌斑指数(TMQHI)的基线数据。收集基线唾液样本并送去计数。然后指导儿童每天使用各自的牙刷两次,持续一周。1周后重复测量口腔卫生指数和唾液计数。

结果

使用配对样本t检验和独立样本t检验进行比较时,刷牙前和刷牙后的菌斑评分以及唾液计数的差异具有统计学意义。使用可咀嚼牙刷和手动牙刷后,唾液计数均显著降低。然而,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异(P = 0.08)。

结论

与手动牙刷相比,可咀嚼牙刷在控制牙菌斑方面同样有效。对于缺乏手部灵活性的儿童来说,这些可咀嚼牙刷可以是一种可靠的替代品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d52b/7791580/f98358547b35/JISPCD-10-759-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验