• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Efficacy of Chewable Brush Compared to Manual Brush in School Going Children of Age Group 10-12 Years.10至12岁学龄儿童中咀嚼式牙刷与手动牙刷的效果比较
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S1301-S1304. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_110_23. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
2
Plaque Removal Efficiency of Chewable Toothbrushes among 10-12-yearold Children: A Randomized Control Trial.10至12岁儿童中可咀嚼牙刷的牙菌斑清除效率:一项随机对照试验
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Nov 24;10(6):759-765. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_339_20. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
3
Effectiveness of Chewable Tooth Brush in Children-A Prospective Clinical Study.儿童可咀嚼牙刷的有效性——一项前瞻性临床研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):ZC31-ZC34. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24238.9528. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
4
Effectiveness of plaque removal with an experimental chewable brush in children between age 9 and 13 years.使用实验性咀嚼刷清除9至13岁儿童牙菌斑的效果。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Dec;19(6):417-421. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0376-2. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
5
Plaque removal with an experimental chewable toothbrush and a control manual toothbrush in a care-dependent elderly population: a pilot study.在依赖照护的老年人群中使用实验性可咀嚼牙刷和对照手动牙刷去除牙菌斑:一项试点研究。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(3):83-6.
6
Efficiency of chewable toothbrush in reduction of dental plaque in students.咀嚼型牙刷在减少学生牙菌斑方面的效率。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Apr 18;19(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0748-y.
7
Is a new sonic toothbrush more effective in plaque removal than a manual toothbrush?新型声波牙刷在去除牙菌斑方面是否比手动牙刷更有效?
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Mar;16(1):13-8.
8
An investigation into the effect of three months' clinical wear on toothbrush efficacy: results from two independent studies.三个月临床使用对牙刷功效影响的调查:两项独立研究的结果
J Clin Dent. 2003;14(2):29-33.
9
Comparative Plaque Removal Efficacy of Three Manual Toothbrushes.三种手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果比较
J Clin Dent. 2016 Sep;27(3):71-75.
10
Plaque-removing efficacy of new and used manual toothbrushes--a professional brushing study.新、旧手动牙刷洁牙效果的比较——一项专业刷牙研究。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2013 Nov;11(4):237-43. doi: 10.1111/idh.12021. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral Health and Caries Prevention: How Tongue Hygiene Helps Maintain Balance of Microbiota and Overall Health in Pediatric Patients.口腔健康与龋齿预防:舌部卫生如何帮助维持儿科患者微生物群平衡及整体健康
Children (Basel). 2024 Jul 3;11(7):816. doi: 10.3390/children11070816.
2
Evidence-Based Practice for the Use of pH Indicator Paper Strip in Oral Medicine: A Literature Review.口腔医学中pH试纸条使用的循证实践:文献综述
Cureus. 2024 Jun 20;16(6):e62797. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62797. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Chewable Tooth Brush in Children-A Prospective Clinical Study.儿童可咀嚼牙刷的有效性——一项前瞻性临床研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):ZC31-ZC34. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/24238.9528. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
2
Reliability of self-reported toothbrushing frequency as an indicator for the assessment of oral hygiene in epidemiological research on caries in adolescents: a cross-sectional study.自我报告的刷牙频率作为青少年龋齿流行病学研究中口腔卫生评估指标的可靠性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Mar 8;15:14. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0002-5.
3
Effectiveness of different tooth brushing techniques on the removal of dental plaque in 6-8 year old children of Gulbarga.不同刷牙方法对古尔伯加6 - 8岁儿童牙菌斑清除效果的研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014 May;4(2):113-6. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.138305.
4
A comparison of the efficacy of powered and manual toothbrushes in controlling plaque and gingivitis: a clinical study.电动牙刷与手动牙刷在控制牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的疗效比较:一项临床研究。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013 Feb 27;5:3-9. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S40656. Print 2013.
5
Xylitol pediatric topical oral syrup to prevent dental caries: a double-blind randomized clinical trial of efficacy.木糖醇儿童局部用口服糖浆预防龋齿:一项疗效的双盲随机临床试验
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Jul;163(7):601-7. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.77.
6
Six-month polyol chewing-gum programme in kindergarten-age children: a feasibility study focusing on mutans streptococci and dental plaque.针对幼儿园儿童的为期六个月的多元醇口香糖项目:一项聚焦于变形链球菌和牙菌斑的可行性研究。
Int Dent J. 2005 Apr;55(2):81-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595x.2005.tb00038.x.
7
Clinical evaluation of the plaque-removing ability of three different toothbrushes in a mentally disabled group.对智障人群中三种不同牙刷的菌斑清除能力的临床评估。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2004 Dec;62(6):350-4. doi: 10.1080/00016350410010054.
8
Comparison of the clinical effectivenes of an electric and a standard toothbrush in normal individuals.正常个体中电动牙刷与标准牙刷临床效果的比较。
J Am Dent Assoc. 1962 Jun;64:777-82. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1962.0155.
9
Clinical study on the plaque-removing ability of a new triple-headed toothbrush.新型三头牙刷去除牙菌斑能力的临床研究
J Clin Periodontol. 1999 May;26(5):281-5. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.260503.x.
10
Comparison of the Interplak and manual toothbrushes in a population with mental retardation/developmental disabilities (MR/DD).智障/发育障碍(MR/DD)人群中Interplak牙刷与手动牙刷的比较。
Spec Care Dentist. 1997 Jul-Aug;17(4):133-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.1997.tb00883.x.

10至12岁学龄儿童中咀嚼式牙刷与手动牙刷的效果比较

Efficacy of Chewable Brush Compared to Manual Brush in School Going Children of Age Group 10-12 Years.

作者信息

Pawar Madhura, Kumari Neha, Gopal Ruchi, Nasha Divya, Bhuyan Lipsa, Verma Vartika

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dr D Y Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr D Y Patil Vidyapeeth Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Awadh Dental College and Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2023 Jul;15(Suppl 2):S1301-S1304. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_110_23. Epub 2023 Jul 11.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_110_23
PMID:37694096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10485457/
Abstract

AIM

Chewable toothbrushes were compared to traditional manual toothbrushes in terms of their ability to remove plaque and their impact on salivary pH in a sample of school-aged children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The sample size for this research was 200 youngsters aged 10-12. Saliva was collected by spitting into a clean container, and the pH levels were measured using color-coded pH strips to determine where the person was starting from. The plaque score was measured using the OHI-S index after the application of the disclosing agent. The pH and plaque scores were also recalculated after brushing to see how they had changed after surgery.

RESULTS

Results indicated that both manual and chewable brushes significantly improved post-brushing pH ratings ( = 0.001), and that plaque scores decreased ( = 0.001). When compared to conventional manual toothbrushes, the chewable brush was much more successful in reducing plaque and elevating salivary pH ( = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

As a result, parents may offer their kids a chewable toothbrush to help them maintain good oral hygiene after lunch and on lengthy car trips, when they would not have time to wash their teeth properly.

摘要

目的

在一组学龄儿童样本中,将可咀嚼牙刷与传统手动牙刷在去除牙菌斑的能力及其对唾液pH值的影响方面进行比较。

材料与方法

本研究的样本量为200名10至12岁的青少年。通过向干净容器中吐痰收集唾液,并使用颜色编码的pH试纸测量pH值水平,以确定受试者的初始状态。在使用菌斑显示剂后,使用OHI-S指数测量菌斑评分。刷牙后还重新计算了pH值和菌斑评分,以观察刷牙后它们的变化情况。

结果

结果表明,手动牙刷和可咀嚼牙刷均显著提高了刷牙后的pH值评分(P = 0.001),且菌斑评分降低(P = 0.001)。与传统手动牙刷相比,可咀嚼牙刷在减少菌斑和提高唾液pH值方面更为成功(P = 0.001)。

结论

因此,家长可以给孩子提供可咀嚼牙刷,以便在午餐后以及长时间乘车旅行时,当孩子没有时间正确刷牙时,帮助他们保持良好的口腔卫生。