Faculty of Medicine, University of Pristina, Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia.
Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Apr 18;19(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0748-y.
Besides classical and electrical toothbrushes market offers tooth brushes that can be chewed, like chewing gums. The aim of this study was to show the effectiveness of chewable toothbrush versus a conventional brush in the students' population.
The prospective study included 346 students. For this research, we used a e-questionnaire for "smart" phones, that students completed outside the dental office. Respondents are divided into two groups: control group used conventional toothbrushes, respondents from the tested group used chewable toothbrush. For assessment of accumulation of the plaque we used TQHI index. For testing statistical hypotheses, the following were used: t-test for two independent samples and analysis of the variance of repeated measurements.
Before brushing teeth, the average TQHI value for chewable brushes is 2.8 ± 0.3, while conventional is 2.7 ± 0.3, which is not a statistically significant difference (p = 0.448). After brushing teeth, the average TQHI value for chewable brushes is 2.0 ± 0.1, while conventional 2.0 ± 0.3, which is also not statistically significant (p = 0.729). Observing the index of the plaque values on the tooth surfaces in the upper jaw, in both groups, there was a statistically significant change in the amount of plaque in time (p < 0.001). There is a statistically significant interaction between groups and changes in the amount of plaque in the observed period (p = 0.013).
The fact that there is no significant difference in the effectiveness of the tested brushes indicates the benefits of using chewable toothbrushes in order to reduce plaque, primarily in the inability to use conventional brushes.
除了传统的和电动牙刷,市场上还有可咀嚼的牙刷,就像咀嚼型口香糖一样。本研究的目的是展示可咀嚼牙刷与普通牙刷在学生群体中的效果差异。
这项前瞻性研究纳入了 346 名学生。为了进行这项研究,我们使用了一个供“智能手机”使用的电子问卷,学生们在牙科诊室外完成问卷。被试者被分为两组:对照组使用传统牙刷,实验组使用可咀嚼牙刷。为了评估菌斑的积累,我们使用了 TQHI 指数。为了检验统计假设,我们使用了两组独立样本 t 检验和重复测量方差分析。
在刷牙前,可咀嚼牙刷的平均 TQHI 值为 2.8±0.3,而普通牙刷为 2.7±0.3,这没有统计学上的显著差异(p=0.448)。刷牙后,可咀嚼牙刷的平均 TQHI 值为 2.0±0.1,而普通牙刷为 2.0±0.3,这也没有统计学上的显著差异(p=0.729)。观察上颌牙齿表面菌斑值的指数,在两组中,随着时间的推移,菌斑量都有统计学上的显著变化(p<0.001)。在观察期间,组间和菌斑量变化之间存在统计学上的显著交互作用(p=0.013)。
测试牙刷效果之间没有显著差异,这表明可咀嚼牙刷在减少菌斑方面具有益处,尤其是在无法使用普通牙刷时。