Nappi Francesco, Spadaccio Cristiano, Moon Marc R
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Dec;8(23):1627. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4439.
Left sided endocarditis (LSE) can include the entirety or portion of mitral and/or aortic valve and the structures in their anatomical contiguity and represent a significant portion of emergency surgical activity. Literature and guidelines on the management of LSE relies mainly on observational studies given the difficulty in designing randomized trials in emergency settings. Heart teams (HT) are often called in to difficult decisions on the most appropriate strategy to adopted in case of LSE. Decision-making should take into account the localization and the extension of the infection, patient preoperative status and comorbidities, presence of a previous valve prosthesis and best timing for surgery. Despite evidence suggests that early surgery may improve survival in patients with complicated infective endocarditis (IE), an increased risk of recurrence and postoperative valvular dysfunctions has been reported. The most important factors associated with long-term outcomes are preoperative multiorgan failure, prosthetic mechanical valve IE, vegetation size ≥15 mm, and timing of surgical treatment. Importantly, up to one third of potential candidates do not undergo surgery and these patients experience extremely high mortality rates. Another important point regards the choice of the optimal valve substitute to be used according to the different clinical situation. The lack of RCT in this field and the difficulty to design this type of studies in the case of non-elective conditions further complicates the possibility to achieve a univocal consensus on the best strategy to be adopted in each form of LSE and further validation studies are needed. On the basis of the current evidences a decisional algorithm is proposed summarizing all the crucial aspects in the management of LSE.
左侧心内膜炎(LSE)可累及二尖瓣和/或主动脉瓣的全部或部分及其解剖毗邻结构,占急诊外科手术的很大一部分。鉴于在急诊环境中设计随机试验存在困难,关于LSE管理的文献和指南主要依赖观察性研究。在LSE病例中,心脏团队(HT)常被召集来就最适合采用的策略做出艰难决策。决策应考虑感染的部位和范围、患者术前状况和合并症、既往是否有瓣膜假体以及最佳手术时机。尽管有证据表明早期手术可能改善复杂性感染性心内膜炎(IE)患者的生存率,但据报道复发风险和术后瓣膜功能障碍有所增加。与长期预后相关的最重要因素是术前多器官功能衰竭、人工机械瓣膜IE、赘生物大小≥15mm以及手术治疗时机。重要的是,多达三分之一的潜在候选者未接受手术,这些患者的死亡率极高。另一个要点是根据不同临床情况选择最佳瓣膜替代品。该领域缺乏随机对照试验,且在非择期情况下难以设计此类研究,这进一步使就每种LSE形式应采用的最佳策略达成明确共识变得复杂,因此需要进一步的验证研究。基于当前证据,提出了一种决策算法,总结了LSE管理中的所有关键方面。