Department of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 715 N Pleasant St, 337 Arnold House, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Jul;48(4):718-728. doi: 10.1007/s10488-020-01106-2. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
Follow-up within 30 days of an emergency department (ED) visit for mental illness is a new and widely-used quality measure. However, no empirical evidence validates associations between follow-up and subsequent utilization based outcomes. Using Massachusetts all payer claims data, we identified insured individuals with an ED visit for mental illness. Multivariate regression analysis estimated associations between follow-up within 30 days after an ED visit for mental illness with costs, hospitalizations, and additional ED visits in 180 days following the index visit. 63,814 index ED visits were included (56.5% female, mean [SD] age 38.0 [12.1] years, 48% Medicaid covered). 31% of index ED principal diagnoses were for major depressive disorder, 3% schizophrenia, 5% bipolar disorder, 34% anxiety disorder, 0.6% post-traumatic stress disorder, 8% other psychoses, and 19% other mental illness diagnoses. Only 33% of patients had a follow-up visit for mental illness within 30 days. Adjusted regression analyses show timely follow-up is associated with increased costs in the 180 days after (average marginal effect = $1622; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1459, 1786), an increased probability of inpatient hospitalization (2.7 percentage points; 95% CI 0.021, 0.032), and a small reduction in the probability of at least one additional ED visit (- 1.7 percentage points; 95% CI - 0.026 to 0.009). Overall follow-up rates are low; follow-up within 30 days of an ED visit for mental illness is associated with increased costs and increased probability of hospitalization in the follow-up period. It is not known whether increased rates of utilization improve patient outcomes, potentially by receiving appropriate more intensive care.
在急诊部门(ED)就诊后 30 天内进行随访是一种新的、广泛使用的质量衡量标准。然而,没有经验证据验证随访与随后基于利用的结果之间的关联。我们使用马萨诸塞州所有支付者索赔数据,确定了因精神疾病到 ED 就诊的参保人员。多变量回归分析估计了 ED 就诊后 30 天内进行随访与就诊后 180 天内的成本、住院和额外 ED 就诊之间的关联。共纳入 63814 例 ED 就诊(56.5%为女性,平均[SD]年龄 38.0[12.1]岁,48%有医疗补助覆盖)。ED 主要诊断的 31%为重度抑郁症,3%为精神分裂症,5%为双相情感障碍,34%为焦虑症,0.6%为创伤后应激障碍,8%为其他精神病,19%为其他精神疾病诊断。只有 33%的患者在 30 天内进行了精神疾病随访。调整后的回归分析表明,及时随访与 180 天后的成本增加相关(平均边际效应=1622 美元;95%置信区间[CI]为 1459 美元,1786 美元),住院的可能性增加(2.7 个百分点;95%CI 为 0.021,0.032),至少一次额外 ED 就诊的可能性略有降低(-1.7 个百分点;95%CI 为-0.026 至 0.009)。总体随访率较低;ED 就诊后 30 天内进行随访与随访期间成本增加和住院可能性增加相关。目前尚不清楚利用率的提高是否会改善患者的预后,可能是因为接受了更适当的强化护理。