• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不等群组周期大小的阶进楔形设计在线性混合模型中的信息含量:为不完全设计提供信息。

Information content of stepped wedge designs with unequal cluster-period sizes in linear mixed models: Informing incomplete designs.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2021 Mar 30;40(7):1736-1751. doi: 10.1002/sim.8867. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1002/sim.8867
PMID:33438255
Abstract

In practice, stepped wedge trials frequently include clusters of differing sizes. However, investigations into the theoretical aspects of stepped wedge designs have, until recently, typically assumed equal numbers of subjects in each cluster and in each period. The information content of the cluster-period cells, clusters, and periods of stepped wedge designs has previously been investigated assuming equal cluster-period sizes, and has shown that incomplete stepped wedge designs may be efficient alternatives to the full stepped wedge. How this changes when cluster-period sizes are not equal is unknown, and we investigate this here. Working within the linear mixed model framework, we show that the information contributed by design components (clusters, sequences, and periods) does depend on the sizes of each cluster-period. Using a particular trial that assessed the impact of an individual education intervention on log-length of stay in rehabilitation units, we demonstrate how strongly the efficiency of incomplete designs depends on which cells are excluded: smaller incomplete designs may be more powerful than alternative incomplete designs that include a greater total number of participants. This also serves to demonstrate how the pattern of information content can be used to inform a set of incomplete designs to be considered as alternatives to the complete stepped wedge design. Our theoretical results for the information content can be extended to a broad class of longitudinal (ie, multiple period) cluster randomized trial designs.

摘要

在实践中,阶梯式楔形试验通常包括不同大小的簇。然而,直到最近,对阶梯式设计理论方面的研究通常假设每个簇和每个时期的受试者数量相等。以前,已经在假设每个簇-时期大小相等的情况下研究了阶梯式楔形设计的簇-时期单元、簇和时期的信息量,并表明不完全的阶梯式楔形设计可能是完整的阶梯式楔形设计的有效替代方案。当簇-时期大小不相等时,这种情况会如何变化尚不清楚,我们在这里对此进行了研究。在线性混合模型框架内,我们表明设计组件(簇、序列和时期)贡献的信息量确实取决于每个簇-时期的大小。使用评估个体教育干预对康复单元日志停留时间影响的特定试验,我们展示了不完全设计的效率在很大程度上取决于排除哪些单元:较小的不完全设计可能比包含更多参与者的替代不完全设计更强大。这也说明了如何使用信息量的模式来为一组要考虑的不完全设计提供信息,作为完整阶梯式楔形设计的替代方案。我们对信息量的理论结果可以扩展到广泛的纵向(即多个时期)集群随机试验设计类别。

相似文献

1
Information content of stepped wedge designs with unequal cluster-period sizes in linear mixed models: Informing incomplete designs.不等群组周期大小的阶进楔形设计在线性混合模型中的信息含量:为不完全设计提供信息。
Stat Med. 2021 Mar 30;40(7):1736-1751. doi: 10.1002/sim.8867. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
2
The optimal design of stepped wedge trials with equal allocation to sequences and a comparison to other trial designs.序列均等分配的阶梯楔形试验的优化设计及其与其他试验设计的比较。
Clin Trials. 2017 Dec;14(6):639-647. doi: 10.1177/1740774517723921. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
3
Relative efficiency of unequal cluster sizes in stepped wedge and other trial designs under longitudinal or cross-sectional sampling.纵向或横截面抽样下不等群集大小在阶梯楔形和其他试验设计中的相对效率。
Stat Med. 2018 Dec 30;37(30):4652-4664. doi: 10.1002/sim.7943. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
4
5
Reconsidering stepped wedge cluster randomized trial designs with implementation periods: Fewer sequences or the parallel-group design with baseline and implementation periods are potentially more efficient.重新考虑具有实施阶段的阶梯型楔形集群随机试验设计:减少序列或具有基线和实施阶段的平行组设计可能更有效。
Clin Trials. 2024 Dec;21(6):710-722. doi: 10.1177/17407745241244790. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
6
The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.不同聚类大小对横向阶段-推移群组随机试验的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 14;19(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0760-6.
7
A review of current practice in the design and analysis of extremely small stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials.关于极小阶梯楔形整群随机试验设计与分析的当前实践综述。
Clin Trials. 2025 Feb;22(1):45-56. doi: 10.1177/17407745241276137. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
8
swdpwr: A SAS macro and an R package for power calculations in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.swdpwr:用于阶梯楔形整群随机试验功效计算的SAS宏和R包。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Jan;213:106522. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106522. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
9
The batched stepped wedge design: A design robust to delays in cluster recruitment.成批分步楔形设计:一种针对群组招募延迟稳健的设计。
Stat Med. 2022 Aug 15;41(18):3627-3641. doi: 10.1002/sim.9438. Epub 2022 May 21.
10
Substantial risks associated with few clusters in cluster randomized and stepped wedge designs.整群随机对照试验和阶梯式楔形设计中,少数群组存在的重大风险。
Clin Trials. 2016 Aug;13(4):459-63. doi: 10.1177/1740774516634316. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Allocation of Observations in Stepped-Wedge and Other Cluster Studies With Correlated Cluster-Period Effects.阶梯楔形及其他具有相关群组-时期效应的群组研究中观察值的最优分配
Stat Med. 2025 Jun;44(13-14):e70100. doi: 10.1002/sim.70100.
2
Inference for the treatment effect in staircase designs with continuous outcomes: a simulation study.连续结果阶梯设计中治疗效果的推断:一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 May 10;25(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02567-5.
3
Designing stepped wedge trials to evaluate physical activity interventions in schools: methodological considerations.
设计阶梯楔形试验以评估学校中的体育活动干预措施:方法学考量
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2025 Feb 25;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12966-025-01720-z.
4
The relative efficiency of staircase and stepped wedge cluster randomised trial designs.阶梯式和阶梯楔形整群随机试验设计的相对效率
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Apr;34(4):701-716. doi: 10.1177/09622802251317613. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
5
Transmural collaborative care model for cardiovascular risk management and medication review in patients using antipsychotics in primary care (TACTIC): A study protocol of an incomplete stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.基层医疗中使用抗精神病药物患者心血管风险管理与用药评估的跨壁协作护理模式(TACTIC):一项不完全阶梯楔形整群随机试验的研究方案
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Jan 9;44:101418. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101418. eCollection 2025 Apr.
6
Reconsidering stepped wedge cluster randomized trial designs with implementation periods: Fewer sequences or the parallel-group design with baseline and implementation periods are potentially more efficient.重新考虑具有实施阶段的阶梯型楔形集群随机试验设计:减少序列或具有基线和实施阶段的平行组设计可能更有效。
Clin Trials. 2024 Dec;21(6):710-722. doi: 10.1177/17407745241244790. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
7
The staircase cluster randomised trial design: A pragmatic alternative to the stepped wedge.阶梯式群组随机试验设计:比递进式楔入设计更实用的选择
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Jan;33(1):24-41. doi: 10.1177/09622802231202364. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
8
Generalizing the information content for stepped wedge designs: A marginal modeling approach.阶梯楔形设计信息内容的推广:一种边际建模方法。
Scand Stat Theory Appl. 2023 Sep;50(3):1048-1067. doi: 10.1111/sjos.12615. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
9
The impact of iterative removal of low-information cluster-period cells from a stepped wedge design.从阶跃楔形设计中迭代去除低信息量簇期细胞的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jul 6;23(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01969-7.
10
The batched stepped wedge design: A design robust to delays in cluster recruitment.成批分步楔形设计:一种针对群组招募延迟稳健的设计。
Stat Med. 2022 Aug 15;41(18):3627-3641. doi: 10.1002/sim.9438. Epub 2022 May 21.