Lazar H L, Wilcox K, Hankins T, Plehn J, Roberts A J
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Mass.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988 Mar;95(3):501-7.
The effects of left ventricular venting and distention on myocardial protection during heterogenous distribution of cardioplegic solution remain undefined. This study was undertaken to determine if left ventricular venting enhances and distention impairs myocardial cooling and recovery of global and regional left ventricular function. Twenty-one pigs were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass and subjected to 80 minutes of ischemic arrest with the mid-left anterior descending artery occluded. Hearts were protected with multidose potassium (25 mEq/L) crystalloid cardioplegic solution supplemented with topical (4 degrees C) and systemic (28 degrees C) hypothermia. During arrest, the left ventricle was vented in seven pigs, seven pigs were not vented, and seven others had systemic pump blood infused into the left ventricle to maintain an end-diastolic pressure of 15 mm Hg. Parameters measured included left ventricular temperature, stroke work index, compliance (end-diastolic pressure-end-diastolic volume curves) and wall motion scores (two-dimensional echocardiography). Distended hearts had the lowest mean left ventricular temperature beyond the left anterior descending arterial occlusion (10.1 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees C distended [p less than 0.025 from vented and nonvented groups] versus 14.2 degrees +/- 0.7 degrees C vented versus 15.5 degrees +/- 1.2 degrees C nonvented), the highest postischemic stroke work index (0.78 +/- 0.09 gm-m/kg distended versus 0.62 +/- 0.07 gm-m/kg vented versus 0.66 +/- 0.07 gm-m/kg nonvented at end-diastolic pressure = 10 mm Hg), and the best wall motion scores (0.7 +/- 0.04 distended [p less than 0.025 from vented and nonvented groups] versus 5.5 +/- 1.80 vented versus 4.8 +/- 1.20 nonvented). Postischemic end-diastolic pressure-end-diastolic volume curves were unchanged from preischemic values in each group. We conclude that during heterogenous cardioplegic arrest, left ventricular venting offers no additional myocardial protection and may negate the beneficial effects of moderate (end-diastolic pressure = 15 mm Hg) left ventricular distention.
在心脏停搏液异质性分布期间,左心室排气和扩张对心肌保护的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定左心室排气是否能增强、而扩张是否会损害心肌降温以及左心室整体和局部功能的恢复。21头猪接受体外循环,并在左前降支动脉中段闭塞的情况下进行80分钟的缺血性停搏。心脏采用多剂量钾(25 mEq/L)晶体心脏停搏液保护,并辅以局部(4℃)和全身(28℃)低温。在停搏期间,7头猪的左心室进行排气,7头猪不排气,另外7头猪将全身泵血注入左心室以维持舒张末期压力为15 mmHg。测量的参数包括左心室温度、每搏功指数、顺应性(舒张末期压力-舒张末期容积曲线)和壁运动评分(二维超声心动图)。扩张的心脏在左前降支动脉闭塞远端的平均左心室温度最低(扩张组为10.1℃±1.8℃[与排气组和不排气组相比,p<0.025],排气组为14.2℃±0.7℃,不排气组为15.5℃±1.2℃),缺血后每搏功指数最高(舒张末期压力=10 mmHg时,扩张组为0.78±0.09 gm-m/kg,排气组为0.62±0.07 gm-m/kg,不排气组为0.66±0.07 gm-m/kg),壁运动评分最佳(扩张组为0.7±0.04[与排气组和不排气组相比,p<0.025],排气组为5.5±1.80,不排气组为4.8±1.20)。每组缺血后舒张末期压力-舒张末期容积曲线与缺血前值无变化。我们得出结论,在异质性心脏停搏期间,左心室排气不能提供额外的心肌保护,并且可能抵消适度(舒张末期压力=15 mmHg)左心室扩张的有益作用。