• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《嗓音障碍儿童的听觉感知评估量表与客观嗓音测量指标之间的关系》。

The Relationship Between Auditory-Perceptual Rating Scales and Objective Voice Measures in Children With Voice Disorders.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jan 27;30(1):228-238. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00188. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00188
PMID:33439742
Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine concurrent validity of the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain (GRBAS) and Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) auditory-perceptual scales in children with voice disorders. A secondary purpose was to determine correlation between the GRBAS, CAPE-V, and objective voice measures. Method GRBAS and CAPE-V ratings and acoustic and aerodynamic measures were collected from the University of Wisconsin-Madison Voice and Swallow Outcomes Database. Correlations between CAPE-V and GRBAS ratings were calculated for overall severity of dysphonia, roughness, breathiness, and strain. Correlations between auditory-perceptual voice ratings and objective voice measures were also examined. Results One hundred thirty GRBAS and CAPE-V auditory-perceptual ratings were significantly correlated for overall severity, roughness, breathiness, and strain. values were highest for overall severity of dysphonia ( = .75) and lowest for strain ( = .54). CAPE-V and GRBAS ratings were largely associated with similar acoustic and aerodynamic measures. The highest correlations were observed for auditory-perceptual ratings of breathiness and jitter% (CAPE-V = .44, GRBAS = .44), shimmer% (CAPE-V = .45, GRBAS = .45), noise-to-harmonic ratio (CAPE-V = .42, GRBAS = .40), fundamental frequency (CAPE-V = .47, GRBAS = .44), and maximum phonation time (CAPE-V = .56, GRBAS = .51). Akaike information criterion values indicated that CAPE-V ratings were more strongly correlated with objective voice measures than GRBAS ratings. Conclusions CAPE-V and GRBAS scales have concurrent validity in children with voice disorders. CAPE-V ratings are more strongly correlated with acoustic and aerodynamic voice measures.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在确定嗓音障碍儿童的 GRBAS(等级、粗糙、呼吸、乏力和紧张)和 CAPE-V(共识性听觉感知嗓音评估)听觉感知量表的同时效度。次要目的是确定 GRBAS、CAPE-V 和客观嗓音测量之间的相关性。

方法 从威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校的嗓音和吞咽结果数据库中收集了 GRBAS 和 CAPE-V 评分以及声学和气流动力学测量值。计算了 CAPE-V 和 GRBAS 评分之间的总体嗓音障碍严重程度、粗糙、呼吸和紧张的相关性。还检查了听觉感知嗓音评分与客观嗓音测量值之间的相关性。

结果 130 个 GRBAS 和 CAPE-V 听觉感知评分与总体严重程度、粗糙、呼吸和紧张显著相关。 值最高的是总体嗓音障碍严重程度( =.75),最低的是紧张( =.54)。CAPE-V 和 GRBAS 评分主要与相似的声学和气流动力学测量值相关。观察到的最高相关性是对呼吸和微扰%(CAPE-V =.44,GRBAS =.44)、颤抖%(CAPE-V =.45,GRBAS =.45)、噪声与谐波比(CAPE-V =.42,GRBAS =.40)、基频(CAPE-V =.47,GRBAS =.44)和最大发音时间(CAPE-V =.56,GRBAS =.51)的听觉感知评分。Akaike 信息准则值表明,CAPE-V 评分与客观嗓音测量值的相关性强于 GRBAS 评分。

结论 在嗓音障碍儿童中,CAPE-V 和 GRBAS 量表具有同时效度。CAPE-V 评分与声学和气流动力学嗓音测量值的相关性更强。

相似文献

1
The Relationship Between Auditory-Perceptual Rating Scales and Objective Voice Measures in Children With Voice Disorders.《嗓音障碍儿童的听觉感知评估量表与客观嗓音测量指标之间的关系》。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Jan 27;30(1):228-238. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00188. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
2
Examining Relationships Between GRBAS Ratings and Acoustic, Aerodynamic and Patient-Reported Voice Measures in Adults With Voice Disorders.研究嗓音障碍成人的GRBAS评分与声学、空气动力学及患者报告的嗓音指标之间的关系。
J Voice. 2023 May;37(3):390-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
3
The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Psychometric Characteristics: II European Portuguese Version (II EP CAPE-V).嗓音的共识性听觉感知评估(CAPE-V)心理测量特征:II 欧洲葡萄牙语版(II EP CAPE-V)。
J Voice. 2019 Jul;33(4):582.e5-582.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
4
Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).《共识性听觉感知嗓音评估(CAPE-V)土耳其语版本的信度和效度》。
J Voice. 2019 May;33(3):382.e1-382.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.11.013. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
5
GRBAS and Cape-V scales: high reliability and consensus when applied at different times.GRBAS 和 Cape-V 量表:在不同时间应用时具有高度可靠性和一致性。
J Voice. 2012 Nov;26(6):812.e17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
6
Cultural and Linguistic Adaptation of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Into Hindi.将嗓音的共识听觉-感知评估(CAPE-V)进行文化和语言调适以适应印地语
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Dec 14;63(12):3974-3981. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00348. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
7
Development and Validation of Sentences in Tamil for Psychoacoustic Evaluation of Voice Using the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice.使用共识性听觉感知嗓音评估法开发和验证泰米尔语嗓音心理声学评估句子。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Dec 12;65(12):4539-4556. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00169. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
8
Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).建立共识性听觉感知嗓音评估(CAPE-V)的有效性。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 Feb;20(1):14-22. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0105). Epub 2010 Aug 25.
9
Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders.基于临床医生(GRBAS 和 CAPE-V)及基于患者(V-RQOL 和 IPVI)的嗓音障碍记录的可靠性。
J Voice. 2007 Sep;21(5):576-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.05.001. Epub 2006 Jul 5.
10
Development and Validation of the Japanese Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice.日语版嗓音共识听觉-感知评估的开发与验证
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Dec 13;64(12):4754-4761. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00269. Epub 2021 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical Comorbidities and Behavioral Health in Adolescents With Voice Disorders.嗓音障碍青少年的医学合并症与行为健康
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2025.2338.
2
Relationship Between Lesion Size, Voice Quality, and Quality of Life in Children With Vocal Nodules.声带小结患儿的病变大小、嗓音质量和生活质量之间的关系
Laryngoscope. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1002/lary.32390.
3
The Pediatric Vocal Mechanism: Structure and Function.小儿发声机制:结构与功能
J Voice. 2025 Apr 4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.03.025.
4
Clinical Case Study: Pediatric Bilateral Benign Vocal Fold Lesions.临床病例研究:小儿双侧良性声带病变
Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2023 Dec;8(6):1337-1344. doi: 10.1044/2022_persp-22-00150. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
5
Effects of Vibratory Source on Auditory-Perceptual and Bio-Inspired Computational Measures of Pediatric Voice Quality.振动源对儿童嗓音质量的听觉感知及生物启发式计算指标的影响
J Voice. 2023 Sep 20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.08.016.
6
Examining Therapy Duration in Adults With Voice Disorders.检查成人嗓音障碍的治疗持续时间。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Jul 10;32(4):1665-1678. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00390. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
7
Videostroboscopy Versus High-Speed Videoendoscopy: Factors Influencing Ratings of Laryngeal Oscillation.频闪喉镜与高速视频喉镜:影响喉部振动评估的因素。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 May 9;66(5):1496-1510. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00649. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
8
Comparative Analysis of Two Methods of Perceptual Voice Assessment.两种感知语音评估方法的比较分析
J Voice. 2023 Mar 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.01.005.
9
Relationship Between Auditory-Perceptual and Objective Measures of Resonance in Children with Cleft Palate: Effects of Intelligibility and Dysphonia.腭裂儿童共鸣的听觉感知与客观测量之间的关系:可懂度和发声障碍的影响。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Aug;61(8):1245-1256. doi: 10.1177/10556656231162238. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
10
Pediatric Voice Therapy: How Many Sessions to Discharge?儿童语音治疗:需要多少个疗程才能出院?
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Nov 16;31(6):2663-2674. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00111. Epub 2022 Oct 5.