University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Mail Slot 772, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 Feb;20(1):14-22. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0105). Epub 2010 Aug 25.
The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) was developed to provide a protocol and form for clinicians to use when assessing the voice quality of adults with voice disorders (Kempster, Gerratt, Verdolini Abbott, Barkmeier-Kramer, & Hillman, 2009). This study examined the reliability and the empirical validity of the CAPE-V when used by experienced voice clinicians judging normal and disordered voices.
The validity of the CAPE-V was examined in 2 ways. First, we compared judgments made by 21 raters of 22 normal and 37 disordered voices using the CAPE-V and the GRBAS (grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain; see Hirano, 1981) scales. Second, we compared our raters' judgments of overall severity to a priori consensus judgments of severity for the 59 voices.
Intrarater reliability coefficients for the CAPE-V ranged from .82 for breathiness to .35 for strain; interrater reliability ranged from .76 for overall severity to .28 for pitch.
Although both CAPE-V and GRBAS reliability coefficients varied across raters and parameters, this study reports slightly improved rater reliability using the CAPE-V to make perceptual judgments of voice quality in comparison to the GRBAS scale. The results provide evidence for the empirical (concurrent) validity of the CAPE-V.
共识性听觉感知评估嗓音(CAPE-V)是为了给临床医生提供一个方案和表格,以便他们评估有嗓音障碍的成年人的嗓音质量(Kempster、Gerratt、Verdolini Abbott、Barkmeier-Kramer 和 Hillman,2009)。本研究考察了经验丰富的嗓音临床医生使用 CAPE-V 评估正常和异常嗓音时的可靠性和实证有效性。
以两种方式检验 CAPE-V 的有效性。首先,我们比较了 21 位评估者使用 CAPE-V 和 GRBAS(等级、粗糙、气息、无力、紧张;见 Hirano,1981)量表对 22 个正常和 37 个异常嗓音的判断。其次,我们将评估者对整体严重程度的判断与 59 个嗓音的预先共识严重程度判断进行比较。
CAPE-V 的内部评估者可靠性系数范围从气息的 0.82 到紧张的 0.35;评估者间可靠性范围从整体严重程度的 0.76 到音高的 0.28。
尽管 CAPE-V 和 GRBAS 的可靠性系数因评估者和参数而异,但与 GRBAS 量表相比,本研究报告使用 CAPE-V 进行嗓音质量的感知判断时,评估者的可靠性略有提高。结果为 CAPE-V 的实证(同时)有效性提供了证据。