• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝素溶液预防 Hickman®导管堵塞的随机临床试验。

Heparin solution in the prevention of occlusions in Hickman® catheters a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Universidade Federal do Paraná, Complexo Hospital de Clínicas, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.

Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2021 Jan 8;29:e3385. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3310.3385. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1590/1518-8345.3310.3385
PMID:33439945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7798395/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the effectiveness of the 50 IU/mL heparin solution compared to the 0.9% isotonic saline solution in preventing occlusion of the double lumen Hickman® catheter, 7 and 9 French, in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

METHOD

a triple-blind randomized clinical trial. 17 double-lumen catheters (heparin group: n=7 and 0.9% isotonic saline group: n=10) were analyzed in which the two catheter routes were evaluated separately, totaling 34 lumens. The outcome variables were occlusion without reflux and complete occlusion. Descriptive analyses were performed using the Chi-square test and, of survival, according to the Kaplan-Meier test.

RESULTS

the mean number of days until the occlusion outcome was 52 in the heparin group and 13.46 in the 0.9% isotonic saline group in the white catheter route (p<0.001). In the red route, the mean follow-up days in the heparin group were 35.29, with no occlusion and 22.30 in the 0.9% isotonic saline group until the first occlusion (p=0.030).

CONCLUSION

blocking with 50 IU/mL heparin solution is more effective than 0.9% isotonic saline in preventing occlusion of the Hickman® catheter. Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials: RBR-3ht499.

摘要

目的

评估 50IU/mL 肝素溶液与 0.9%生理盐水在预防造血干细胞移植患者使用 7 法国和 9 法国双腔 Hickman®导管堵塞方面的有效性。

方法

一项三盲随机临床试验。分析了 17 个双腔导管(肝素组:n=7 和 0.9%生理盐水组:n=10),分别评估了两条导管通路,共计 34 个腔道。结局变量为无反流和完全闭塞的导管堵塞。采用卡方检验进行描述性分析,采用 Kaplan-Meier 检验进行生存分析。

结果

肝素组白色导管通路的导管堵塞结局的平均天数为 52 天,0.9%生理盐水组为 13.46 天(p<0.001)。在红色导管通路中,肝素组的平均随访天数为 35.29 天,无堵塞,而 0.9%生理盐水组在第一次堵塞前为 22.30 天(p=0.030)。

结论

与 0.9%生理盐水相比,50IU/mL 肝素溶液在预防 Hickman®导管堵塞方面更有效。巴西临床试验注册处:RBR-3ht499。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e73/7798395/c18edd41e2d2/0104-1169-rlae-29-e3385-gf05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e73/7798395/7135325f8fc5/0104-1169-rlae-29-e3385-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e73/7798395/6c2a1f9dd05a/0104-1169-rlae-29-e3385-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e73/7798395/02dd3431bc22/0104-1169-rlae-29-e3385-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e73/7798395/63c151b1f8b4/0104-1169-rlae-29-e3385-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e73/7798395/c18edd41e2d2/0104-1169-rlae-29-e3385-gf05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e73/7798395/7135325f8fc5/0104-1169-rlae-29-e3385-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e73/7798395/6c2a1f9dd05a/0104-1169-rlae-29-e3385-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e73/7798395/02dd3431bc22/0104-1169-rlae-29-e3385-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e73/7798395/63c151b1f8b4/0104-1169-rlae-29-e3385-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e73/7798395/c18edd41e2d2/0104-1169-rlae-29-e3385-gf05.jpg

相似文献

1
Heparin solution in the prevention of occlusions in Hickman® catheters a randomized clinical trial.肝素溶液预防 Hickman®导管堵塞的随机临床试验。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2021 Jan 8;29:e3385. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3310.3385. eCollection 2021.
2
Flushing the central venous catheter: is heparin necessary?冲洗中心静脉导管:是否需要使用肝素?
J Vasc Access. 2014 Jul-Aug;15(4):241-8. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000225. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
3
Comparison of heparin to citrate as a catheter locking solution for non-tunneled central venous hemodialysis catheters in patients requiring renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure (VERROU-REA study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.肝素与枸橼酸盐作为急性肾衰竭需要肾脏替代治疗患者非隧道式中心静脉血液透析导管封管溶液的比较(VERROU-REA研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Nov 19;15:449. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-449.
4
A vancomycin-heparin lock solution for prevention of nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill neonates with peripherally inserted central venous catheters: a prospective, randomized trial.用于预防经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管的危重新生儿医院血流感染的万古霉素 - 肝素封管液:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Pediatrics. 2005 Aug;116(2):e198-205. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2674. Epub 2005 Jul 1.
5
Keeping central venous lines open: a prospective comparison of heparin, vitamin C and sodium chloride sealing solutions in medical patients.维持中心静脉导管通畅:肝素、维生素C和氯化钠封管液在内科患者中的前瞻性比较
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Aug;28(8):1172-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1379-2. Epub 2002 Jul 5.
6
Discard volumes necessary for clinically useful coagulation studies from heparinized Hickman catheters.从肝素化的希克曼导管中丢弃临床有用的凝血研究所需的血量。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996 May;23(4):671-5.
7
Continuous heparin infusion to prevent thrombosis and catheter occlusion in neonates with peripherally placed percutaneous central venous catheters.持续输注肝素以预防经外周置入经皮中心静脉导管的新生儿发生血栓形成和导管堵塞。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20(3):CD002772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002772.pub2.
8
Comparison between Saline Solution Containing Heparin versus Saline Solution in the Lock of Totally Implantable Catheters.完全植入式导管锁中含肝素生理盐水溶液与生理盐水溶液的比较
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;47:85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
9
Heparinized solution vs. saline solution in the maintenance of arterial catheters: a double blind randomized clinical trial.肝素化溶液与生理盐水用于维持动脉导管:一项双盲随机临床试验
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Feb;34(2):339-43. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0886-6. Epub 2007 Oct 16.
10
Prospective, randomized trial of two different modalities of flushing central venous catheters in pediatric patients with cancer.癌症患儿中心静脉导管两种不同冲洗方式的前瞻性随机试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 20;27(12):2059-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.4860. Epub 2009 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Central venous access device terminologies, complications, and reason for removal in oncology: a scoping review.肿瘤学中中央静脉通路装置的术语、并发症和移除原因:范围综述。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12099-8.
2
Mediport use as an acceptable standard for CAR T cell infusion.输液港可作为 CAR-T 细胞输注的可接受标准。
Front Immunol. 2023 Oct 27;14:1239132. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1239132. eCollection 2023.
3
The methods for removal of direct oral anticoagulants and heparins to improve the monitoring of hemostasis: a narrative literature review.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidents related to the Hickman® catheter: identification of damages.与希克曼®导管相关的事件:损伤识别
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 Jul-Aug;71(4):1915-1920. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0051.
2
Comparison between Saline Solution Containing Heparin versus Saline Solution in the Lock of Totally Implantable Catheters.完全植入式导管锁中含肝素生理盐水溶液与生理盐水溶液的比较
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Feb;47:85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
3
Normal saline versus heparin for patency of central venous catheters in adult patients - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
去除直接口服抗凝剂和肝素以改善止血监测的方法:一篇叙述性文献综述
Thromb J. 2023 May 19;21(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12959-023-00501-7.
4
Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults.肝素与 0.9%氯化钠封管预防成人中心静脉导管阻塞的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 18;7(7):CD008462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008462.pub4.
5
Monitoring of Anticoagulant Activity of Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban in the Presence of Heparins.在肝素存在的情况下监测达比加群和利伐沙班的抗凝活性。
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 16;11(8):2236. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082236.
成人患者中心静脉导管通畅性:生理盐水与肝素比较的系统评价和荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2017 Jan 8;21(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1585-x.
4
Evidence-based criteria for the choice and the clinical use of the most appropriate lock solutions for central venous catheters (excluding dialysis catheters): a GAVeCeLT consensus.中心静脉导管(不包括透析导管)最合适封管溶液选择及临床应用的循证标准:一项GAVeCeLT共识
J Vasc Access. 2016 Nov 2;17(6):453-464. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000576. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
5
[Effectiveness of heparin versus 0.9% saline solution in maintaining the permeability of central venous catheters: a systematic review].肝素与0.9%生理盐水溶液在维持中心静脉导管通畅性方面的有效性:一项系统评价
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015 Dec;49(6):999-1007. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420150000600017.
6
Complications of central venous catheter in patients transplanted with hematopoietic stem cells in a specialized service.专科服务中造血干细胞移植患者中心静脉导管的并发症
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Jun 7;24. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.0547.2698.
7
Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride intermittent flushing for the prevention of occlusion in long term central venous catheters in infants and children.肝素与0.9%氯化钠间歇性冲管预防婴幼儿长期中心静脉导管堵塞的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 23(11):CD010996. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010996.pub2.
8
Comparison of the effects of heparin and 0.9% sodium chloride solutions in maintenance of patency of central venous catheters.肝素与0.9%氯化钠溶液对维持中心静脉导管通畅效果的比较。
Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Mar 30;5(2):e22595. doi: 10.5812/aapm.22595. eCollection 2015 Apr.
9
Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride intermittent flushing for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults.肝素与0.9%氯化钠间断冲管预防成人中心静脉导管堵塞的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 8(10):CD008462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008462.pub2.
10
Flushing the central venous catheter: is heparin necessary?冲洗中心静脉导管:是否需要使用肝素?
J Vasc Access. 2014 Jul-Aug;15(4):241-8. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000225. Epub 2014 Apr 25.