Clinical Epilepsy Section, NINDS NIH Building 10 Room 7D-43, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Feb;115:107704. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107704. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
Despite extensive scholarship, several questions on the view of seizures and epilepsy in the Hippocratic collection have not been answered. The book 'On the Sacred Disease' contains descriptions of focal and generalized tonic-clonic seizures, understands the stigma attached to epilepsy, its association with depression, and probably describes auras. Remarkably, the collection presents a physiologic theory of 'mental' disease. Other parts of the collection suggest recognition of syndromes such as childhood febrile seizures. Non-motor seizures are not clearly described. There may be a distinction between 'acute symptomatic' and recurrent seizures or 'epilepsy.' Analysis of the relative occurrence of terms related to 'epilepsy' or 'spasms' in an online text collection shows a significant difference: 'epilepsy' terms are more frequent when seizures are described alone, while 'spasm' terms are more frequent in the context of systemic diseases or injuries. This dichotomy suggests, in contrast to previous accounts, possible understanding of the distinction between 'idiopathic' and 'symptomatic' seizure disorders.
尽管有大量的学术研究,但希波克拉底文集对癫痫发作和癫痫的看法仍有几个问题尚未得到解答。《神圣疾病论》一书中描述了局灶性和全面性强直阵挛性发作,理解了癫痫的污名、它与抑郁的关联,并可能描述了先兆。值得注意的是,该文集提出了一种“精神”疾病的生理理论。该文集的其他部分表明对儿童热性惊厥等综合征的认识。非运动性发作并未明确描述。“急性症状性”和复发性发作或“癫痫”之间可能存在区别。对在线文本集中与“癫痫”或“痉挛”相关的术语相对出现频率的分析表明存在显著差异:当仅描述发作时,“癫痫”术语更为常见,而在系统性疾病或损伤的背景下,“痉挛”术语更为常见。这种二分法表明,与之前的描述相比,可能理解了“特发性”和“症状性”发作障碍之间的区别。