• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Experience with limited versus extensive disc removal in patients undergoing microsurgical operations for ruptured lumbar discs.

作者信息

Rogers L A

机构信息

Charlotte Neurosurgical Associates, P.A., North Carolina.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 1988 Jan;22(1 Pt 1):82-5. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198801010-00013.

DOI:10.1227/00006123-198801010-00013
PMID:3344091
Abstract

Of 68 patients undergoing microsurgical operations for ruptured lumbar discs, 33 were treated by removing only the herniated fragments. In the remaining 35, an attempt was made to remove the entire disc. No recurrences followed the more extensive discectomies during follow-up periods varying from 11 to 30 months. Seven recurrences followed operations in which only the offending fragment was removed (recurrence rate of 21%), four within 6 months. Among 68 patients treated by conventional neurosurgical techniques, there was only one recurrence during follow-up periods of at least 4 years. None of the operations was clearly superior in relieving leg pain, but microsurgically treated patients spent less time in the hospital and returned to work more quickly.

摘要

相似文献

1
Experience with limited versus extensive disc removal in patients undergoing microsurgical operations for ruptured lumbar discs.
Neurosurgery. 1988 Jan;22(1 Pt 1):82-5. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198801010-00013.
2
Fragment excision versus conventional disc removal in the microsurgical treatment of herniated lumbar disc.腰椎间盘突出症显微手术治疗中碎块切除与传统椎间盘切除术的比较
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1995;133(3-4):107-11. doi: 10.1007/BF01420059.
3
The lumbar shield: a preliminary report.
Neurosurgery. 1978 Jul-Aug;3(1):26-36. doi: 10.1227/00006123-197807000-00005.
4
Post-discectomy perineural fibrosis: comparison of conventional versus microsurgical techniques.椎间盘切除术后神经周围纤维化:传统技术与显微外科技术的比较
Microsurgery. 1992;13(4):192-4. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920130409.
5
The microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc protrusion. Follow-up of 60 cases.腰椎间盘突出症的显微外科治疗。60例随访
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987 Nov;69(5):696-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.69B5.3680326.
6
Comparison of chemonucleolysis and microsurgical discectomy for the treatment of herniated lumbar disc.化学髓核溶解术与显微外科椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Oct;12(8):796-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198710000-00016.
7
Quantity of Disc Removal and Radiological Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术的椎间盘切除量与放射学结果。
Pain Physician. 2017 Jul;20(5):E737-E746.
8
The effect of lumbar disc surgery on postoperative pulmonary function and temperature. A comparison study of microsurgical lumbar discectomy with standard lumbar discectomy.腰椎间盘手术对术后肺功能和体温的影响。显微外科腰椎间盘切除术与标准腰椎间盘切除术的比较研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Feb;18(2):287-90. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199302000-00019.
9
Microsurgical lumbar discectomy: preliminary report of 83 consecutive cases.显微外科腰椎间盘切除术:83例连续病例的初步报告。
Neurosurgery. 1979 Feb;4(2):137-40. doi: 10.1227/00006123-197902000-00005.
10
Epidural haematoma after lumbar disc surgery causing radiculopathy.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1999;141(11):1239-40. doi: 10.1007/s007010050426.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Stand-Alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, 360° Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Arthroplasty for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: Focus on Nerve Decompression and Painful Spinal Instability Resolution.单纯前路腰椎椎间融合术、360°前路腰椎椎间融合术与人工关节置换术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:聚焦神经减压与疼痛性脊柱不稳的解决
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Jun 12;19(3):302-311. doi: 10.14444/8761.
2
Risk factors for reoperation after discectomy of lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease.腰椎间盘突出症椎间盘切除术后再次手术的危险因素。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2024 Apr 30;36(3):298-303. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_206_23. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
3
Limited discectomy versus aggressive discectomy by spinal endoscopy with the transforaminal approach for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.
经皮椎间孔镜下有限与广泛椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 28;25(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07498-8.
4
Risk factors for early reherniation after lumbar discectomy with or without annular closure: results of a multicenter randomized controlled study.腰椎间盘切除术后早期再突出的危险因素:一项多中心随机对照研究的结果。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Jan;163(1):259-268. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04505-4. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
5
Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Review.复发性腰椎间盘突出症:综述
Global Spine J. 2019 Apr;9(2):202-209. doi: 10.1177/2192568217745063. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
6
Preliminary Report of Combined Microscopic Fragmentectomy and Nucleoplasty for Sequestrated Lumbar Disc Herniation.游离型腰椎间盘突出症的显微碎核切除术与髓核成形术联合应用初步报告
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2014 Apr;10(1):6-9. doi: 10.13004/kjnt.2014.10.1.6. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
7
Primary limited lumbar discectomy with an annulus closure device: one-year clinical and radiographic results from a prospective, multi-center study.使用椎间盘环闭合装置的初次有限腰椎间盘切除术:一项前瞻性多中心研究的一年临床和影像学结果
Korean J Spine. 2012 Dec;9(4):340-7. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2012.9.4.340. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
8
Comparison of discectomy versus sequestrectomy in lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.腰椎间盘突出症中椎间盘切除术与髓核摘除术的比较:一项比较研究的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0121816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121816. eCollection 2015.
9
Clinical outcomes after posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilization with limited lumbar discectomy: Carragee classification system for lumbar disc herniations.有限腰椎间盘切除术后后路动态经椎弓根稳定术的临床结果:腰椎间盘突出症的卡拉吉分类系统
SAS J. 2010 Sep 1;4(3):92-7. doi: 10.1016/j.esas.2010.06.001. eCollection 2010.
10
Incidence of Low Back Pain After Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Disc and Its Effect on Patient-reported Outcomes.腰椎间盘突出症行腰椎间盘切除术后腰痛的发生率及其对患者报告结局的影响。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):1988-99. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4193-1.