Suppr超能文献

比较五种量表对老年重症脓毒症患者4年全因死亡率的预测价值。

Comparing the predictive values of five scales for 4-year all-cause mortality in critically ill elderly patients with sepsis.

作者信息

Jia Linpei, Hao Lixiao, Li Xiaoxia, Jia Rufu, Zhang Hong-Liang

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of General Practice, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;10(3):2387-2397. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1355. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several severity scales have been documented to predict the short-term mortality of septic patients. However, the predictive efficacies of different severity scales in the long-term mortality of the elderly have yet to be evaluated.

METHODS

In the retrospective study, a cohort of 4,370 elderly (≥65 years) septic patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were divided into three different age groups, i.e., the younger-old group (65 years ≤ age <75 years), the older-old group (75 years ≤ age <85 years) and the oldest-old group (age ≥85 years). Five scales, including the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), the Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score (OASIS), the Modified Logistic Organ Dysfunction System (MLODS), the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), were used for disease severity evaluations. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to assess prognostic values of the long-term mortality of each severity scale.

RESULTS

Compared with patients in the oldest-old group, those in the younger-old and the older-old groups had higher scores of SAPS II and OASIS, indicating more serious illness and worse prognosis. The survival time of patients was inversely related to age; the mean survival time was the longest in the youngerold group, followed by the older-old group and the oldest-old group. SAPS II had the best prognostic value (AUC: 0.648 for SAPS II, 0.579 for MLODS, 0.577 for SOFA, 0.612 for OASIS and 0.515 for SIRS, P<0.01) for the 4-year all-cause mortality. Elderly patients with an SAPS II score >43 had a lower survival rate regardless of age.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term mortality of elderly patients with sepsis is increased with age. SAPS II can better predict the long-term prognosis of elderly septic patients in ICU.

摘要

背景

已有多种严重程度评分系统用于预测脓毒症患者的短期死亡率。然而,不同严重程度评分系统对老年人长期死亡率的预测效能尚未得到评估。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,将4370名入住重症监护病房(ICU)的老年(≥65岁)脓毒症患者分为三个不同年龄组,即年轻老年人组(65岁≤年龄<75岁)、老年老年人组(75岁≤年龄<85岁)和高龄老年人组(年龄≥85岁)。使用包括简化急性生理学评分II(SAPS II)、牛津急性疾病严重程度评分(OASIS)、改良逻辑器官功能障碍系统(MLODS)、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)在内的五种评分系统对疾病严重程度进行评估。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来评估各严重程度评分系统对长期死亡率的预后价值。

结果

与高龄老年人组患者相比,年轻老年人组和老年老年人组患者的SAPS II和OASIS评分更高,表明病情更严重,预后更差。患者的生存时间与年龄呈负相关;年轻老年人组的平均生存时间最长,其次是老年老年人组和高龄老年人组。SAPS II对4年全因死亡率的预后价值最佳(SAPS II的AUC为0.648,MLODS为0.579,SOFA为0.577,OASIS为0.612,SIRS为0.515,P<0.01)。无论年龄如何,SAPS II评分>43的老年患者生存率较低。

结论

老年脓毒症患者的长期死亡率随年龄增长而增加。SAPS II能更好地预测ICU老年脓毒症患者的长期预后。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验