Suppr超能文献

在泰国两个不同治疗环境中患者的物质使用障碍的流行情况和相关因素。

The prevalence and correlates of substance use disorders among patients of two different treatment settings in Thailand.

机构信息

ASEAN Institute for Health Development, Mahidol University, Salaya, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.

Department of Research Administration and Development, University of Limpopo, Turfloop, South Africa.

出版信息

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Jan 13;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00345-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Monk healers provide an accessible and popular service in Southeast Asia, but little is known on the substance use status of their clients. This investigation intended to assess and compare the rate and correlates of substance use disorders in two different treatment settings (monk healers = MH and primary health care = PHC) in Thailand.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, 1024 patients (591 of MH and 613 of PHC) responded to screening measures of the "World Health Organization Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test Lite", and two common mental disorders (major depression and generalized anxiety disorder) from November 2018 to February 2019. Logistic regression was used to estimate the determinants of any substance use disorder in the MH and PHC setting.

RESULTS

The prevalence of substance use disorder was higher in MH clients than PHC patients: any substance use disorder 11.7% (95% Confidence Interval-CI: 9.3-14.5%) vs 5.4% (95% CI: 3.9-7.5%), tobacco use disorder 7.6% (95% CI: 5.7-9.9%) vs 2.5% (95% CI: 1.5-4.0%), alcohol use disorder 10.0% (95% CI: 8.4-13.6%) vs 4.3% (95% CI: 3.0-6.3%), any drug use disorder 4.2% (95% CI: 2.8-6.1%) vs 0.3% (95% CI: 0.08-1.3%), and any past three months drug use 8.2% (95% CI: 6.2-10.7%) vs 1.5, 95% CI: 0.8-2.8%). In adjusted logistic regression analysis, among MH clients, male sex (Adjusted Odds Ratio-AOR: 9.52, 95% Confidence Interval-CI: 5.06-17.92) was positively, and were married (AOR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.16-0.61) and high social support (AOR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.16-0.99) were negatively associated with any substance use disorder. Among PHC patients, male sex (AOR: 7.05, 95% CI: 2.99-16.63) was positively and age (AOR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.98) was negatively associated with any substance use disorder.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of substance use disorders among MH attendees was more than twice that of PHC attenders in Thailand, calling for collaboration in controlling substance use disorders between the two treatment systems.

摘要

背景

在东南亚,僧侣治疗师提供了一种易于获得且受欢迎的服务,但人们对他们的客户的物质使用状况知之甚少。本研究旨在评估和比较泰国两个不同治疗环境(僧侣治疗师=MH 和初级保健=PHC)中物质使用障碍的发生率和相关因素。

方法

在一项横断面研究中,1024 名患者(MH 组 591 名,PHC 组 613 名)对 2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 2 月期间的“世界卫生组织酒精、吸烟和物质使用参与筛查测试 Lite”和两种常见精神障碍(重度抑郁症和广泛性焦虑症)的筛查措施做出了回应。使用逻辑回归来估计 MH 和 PHC 环境中任何物质使用障碍的决定因素。

结果

MH 客户的物质使用障碍患病率高于 PHC 患者:任何物质使用障碍 11.7%(95%置信区间-CI:9.3-14.5%)与 5.4%(95%CI:3.9-7.5%),烟草使用障碍 7.6%(95%CI:5.7-9.9%)与 2.5%(95%CI:1.5-4.0%),酒精使用障碍 10.0%(95%CI:8.4-13.6%)与 4.3%(95%CI:3.0-6.3%),任何药物使用障碍 4.2%(95%CI:2.8-6.1%)与 0.3%(95%CI:0.08-1.3%),以及任何过去三个月的药物使用 8.2%(95%CI:6.2-10.7%)与 1.5%,95%CI:0.8-2.8%。在调整后的逻辑回归分析中,在 MH 客户中,男性(调整后的优势比-AOR:9.52,95%置信区间-CI:5.06-17.92)呈阳性,已婚(AOR:0.32,95%CI:0.16-0.61)和高社会支持(AOR:0.40,95%CI:0.16-0.99)呈阴性与任何物质使用障碍相关。在 PHC 患者中,男性(AOR:7.05,95%CI:2.99-16.63)呈阳性,年龄(AOR:0.95,95%CI:0.92-0.98)呈阴性与任何物质使用障碍相关。

结论

在泰国,MH 参与者中物质使用障碍的比例是 PHC 参与者的两倍多,这需要两个治疗系统之间在控制物质使用障碍方面进行合作。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验