Bos Elke Me, van der Lee Koen, Haumann Johan, de Quelerij Marcel, Vandertop W Peter, Kalkman Cor J, Hollmann Markus W, Lirk Philipp
Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anesthesiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Apr;46(4):337-343. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102154. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
Besides spinal complications, intracranial hematoma or abscess may occur after neuraxial block. Risk factors and outcome remain unclear.
This review evaluates characteristics, treatment and recovery of patients with intracranial complications after neuraxial block.
We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library from their inception to May 2020 for case reports/series, cohort studies and reviews of intracranial hematoma or abscess associated with neuraxial block. Quality of evidence was assessed using the critical appraisal of a case study checklist by Crombie.
We analyzed 232 reports, including 291 patients with hematoma and six patients with abscess/empyema. The major part of included studies comprised single case reports with a high risk of bias. Of the patients with hematoma, 48% concerned obstetric patients, the remainder received neuraxial block for various perioperative indications or pain management. Prior dural puncture was reported in 81%, either intended (eg, spinal anesthesia) or unintended (eg, complicated epidural catheter placement). Headache was described in 217 patients; in 101 patients, symptoms resembled postdural puncture headache (PDPH). After treatment, 11% had partial or no recovery and 8% died, indicating the severity of this complication. Intracranial abscess after neuraxial block is seldom reported; six reports were found.
Diagnosis of intracranial hematoma is often missed initially, as headache is assumed to be caused by cerebrospinal hypotension due to cerebrospinal fluid leakage, known as PDPH. Prolonged headache without improvement, worsening symptoms despite treatment or epidural blood patch, change of headache from postural to non-postural or new neurological signs should alert physicians to alternative diagnoses.
除了脊柱并发症外,神经轴阻滞术后可能会发生颅内血肿或脓肿。其危险因素和预后仍不清楚。
本综述评估神经轴阻滞后颅内并发症患者的特征、治疗和恢复情况。
我们系统检索了MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆自建库至2020年5月期间有关与神经轴阻滞相关的颅内血肿或脓肿的病例报告/系列、队列研究和综述。使用Crombie的案例研究清单批判性评估来评估证据质量。
我们分析了232份报告,包括291例血肿患者和6例脓肿/积脓患者。纳入研究的主要部分是存在高偏倚风险的单病例报告。在血肿患者中,48%为产科患者,其余患者因各种围手术期指征或疼痛管理接受神经轴阻滞。81%的患者报告有先前的硬膜穿刺,无论是有意的(如脊髓麻醉)还是无意的(如复杂的硬膜外导管置入)。217例患者描述有头痛;101例患者的症状类似硬膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)。治疗后,11%的患者部分恢复或未恢复,8%的患者死亡,表明该并发症的严重性。神经轴阻滞后颅内脓肿很少有报道;共发现6份报告。
颅内血肿的诊断最初常被漏诊,因为头痛被认为是由脑脊液漏导致的脑脊液低压引起的,即PDPH。头痛持续不缓解、治疗后症状仍恶化或硬膜外血贴治疗无效、头痛从体位性变为非体位性或出现新的神经体征,应提醒医生考虑其他诊断。