• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用偏差校正元前沿方法和内生转换回归分析南亚小麦保护性耕作的技术效率。

Application of a bias-corrected meta-frontier approach and an endogenous switching regression to analyze the technical efficiency of conservation tillage for wheat in South Asia.

作者信息

Aravindakshan Sreejith, Rossi Frederick, Amjath-Babu T S, Veettil Prakashan Chellattan, Krupnik Timothy J

机构信息

Farming Systems Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

出版信息

J Product Anal. 2018;49:153-171. doi: 10.1007/s11123-018-0525-y. Epub 2018 Feb 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11123-018-0525-y
PMID:33442199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7771628/
Abstract

Conservation tillage (CT) options are among the most rapidly spreading land preparation and crop establishment techniques globally. In South Asia, CT has spread dramatically over the last decade, a result of strong policy support and increasing availability of appropriate machinery. Although many studies have analyzed the yield and profitability of CT systems, the technical efficiency impacts accrued by farmers utilizing CT have received considerably less attention. Employing a DEA framework, we isolated bias-corrected meta-frontier technical efficiencies and meta-technology ratios of three CT options adopted by wheat farmers in Bangladesh, including bed planting (BP), power tiller operated seeding (PTOS), and strip tillage (ST), compared to a control group of farmers practicing traditional tillage (TT). Endogenous switching regression was subsequently employed to overcome potential self-selection bias in the choice of CT, in order to robustly estimate efficiency factors. Among the tillage options studied, PTOS was the most technically efficient, with an average meta-technology ratio of 0.90, followed by BP (0.88), ST (0.83), and TT (0.67). The average predicted meta-frontier technical efficiency for the CT non-adopters under a counterfactual scenario (0.80) was significantly greater ( = 0.00) than current TE scores (0.65), indicating the potential for sizeable profitability increases with CT adoption. Conversely, the counterfactual TE of non-adopters was 23% greater than their DEA efficiency, also indicating efficiency gains from CT adoption. Our results provide backing for agricultural development programs in South Asia that aim to increase smallholder farmers' income through the application of CT as a pathway towards poverty reduction. C06 ● C14 ● Q12 ● C34 ● C51.

摘要

保护性耕作(CT)方法是全球范围内传播速度最快的土地准备和作物种植技术之一。在南亚,过去十年间保护性耕作迅速推广,这得益于强有力的政策支持以及适用机械的日益普及。尽管许多研究分析了保护性耕作系统的产量和盈利能力,但农民采用保护性耕作所产生的技术效率影响却很少受到关注。我们采用数据包络分析(DEA)框架,分离出了孟加拉国小麦种植农户采用的三种保护性耕作方法(包括垄作(BP)、动力耕耘机播种(PTOS)和带状耕作(ST))经偏差校正后的元前沿技术效率和元技术比率,并与采用传统耕作(TT)的对照组农户进行了比较。随后采用内生转换回归来克服在选择保护性耕作时可能存在的自我选择偏差,以便稳健地估计效率因素。在所研究的耕作方法中,动力耕耘机播种在技术上效率最高,平均元技术比率为0.90,其次是垄作(0.88)、带状耕作(0.83)和传统耕作(0.67)。在反事实情景下,保护性耕作未采用者的平均预测元前沿技术效率(0.80)显著高于当前的技术效率得分(0.65)(p = 0.00),这表明采用保护性耕作有大幅提高盈利能力的潜力。相反,未采用者的反事实技术效率比其数据包络分析效率高23%,这也表明采用保护性耕作可提高效率。我们的研究结果为南亚的农业发展项目提供了支持,这些项目旨在通过应用保护性耕作来增加小农户收入,以此作为减贫途径。C06 ● C14 ● Q12 ● C34 ● C51。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/7771628/d70e4f44e074/JPA-49-153-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/7771628/889a4c353adf/JPA-49-153-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/7771628/6f8af27a913f/JPA-49-153-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/7771628/475dc134ebfc/JPA-49-153-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/7771628/809cddd2acd0/JPA-49-153-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/7771628/d70e4f44e074/JPA-49-153-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/7771628/889a4c353adf/JPA-49-153-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/7771628/6f8af27a913f/JPA-49-153-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/7771628/475dc134ebfc/JPA-49-153-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/7771628/809cddd2acd0/JPA-49-153-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aa1/7771628/d70e4f44e074/JPA-49-153-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of a bias-corrected meta-frontier approach and an endogenous switching regression to analyze the technical efficiency of conservation tillage for wheat in South Asia.应用偏差校正元前沿方法和内生转换回归分析南亚小麦保护性耕作的技术效率。
J Product Anal. 2018;49:153-171. doi: 10.1007/s11123-018-0525-y. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
2
A metafrontier approach and fractional regression model to analyze the environmental efficiency of alternative tillage practices for wheat in Bangladesh.一种运用元前沿方法和分数回归模型分析孟加拉国小麦替代耕作方式环境效率的研究
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(27):41231-41246. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18296-3. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
3
Willingness to pay for adopting conservation tillage technologies in wheat cultivation: policy options for small-scale farmers.采用保护性耕作技术种植小麦的意愿:小规模农户的政策选择。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(42):63458-63471. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20306-x. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
4
Study on the Influencing Factors of Farmers' Adoption of Conservation Tillage Technology in Black Soil Region in China: A Logistic-ISM Model Approach.中国黑土区农户保护性耕作技术采用影响因素研究——基于 Logistic-ISM 模型方法
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 24;19(13):7762. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137762.
5
Apparent Gains, Hidden Costs: Examining Adoption Drivers, Yield, and Profitability Outcomes of Rotavator Tillage in Wheat Systems in Nepal.表面收益,隐藏成本:审视尼泊尔小麦种植系统中旋耕机耕作的采用驱动因素、产量及盈利结果
J Agric Econ. 2020 Feb;71(1):199-218. doi: 10.1111/1477-9552.12333. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
6
Conservation Agriculture Improves Soil Quality, Crop Yield, and Incomes of Smallholder Farmers in North Western Ghana.保护性农业改善了加纳西北部小农户的土壤质量、作物产量和收入。
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jun 21;8:996. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00996. eCollection 2017.
7
What is the impact of rural bank credit access on the technical efficiency of smallholder cassava farmers in Ghana? An endogenous switching regression analysis.加纳农村银行信贷获取对小农户木薯种植技术效率有何影响?内生转换回归分析。
Heliyon. 2021 May 21;7(5):e07102. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07102. eCollection 2021 May.
8
Modified strip tillage blades for two-wheel tractor seed drills improves maize crop establishment under conservation agriculture.用于两轮拖拉机播种机的改良带状耕作刀片可改善保护性农业下玉米作物的种植情况。
Dev Eng. 2021;6:100061. doi: 10.1016/j.deveng.2021.100061.
9
Zero-tillage is a proven technology for sustainable wheat intensification in the Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains: what determines farmer awareness and adoption?免耕是印度恒河平原东部实现小麦可持续集约化种植的一项经过验证的技术:是什么决定了农民的认知和采用情况?
Food Secur. 2017;9:723-743. doi: 10.1007/s12571-017-0707-x. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
10
Farmers' adoption behavior of conservation tillage technology: a multidimensional heterogeneity perspective.农民对保护性耕作技术的采用行为:多维异质性视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):37744-37761. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24716-9. Epub 2022 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of cooperative membership on farmers' technology adoption based on the mediating effects of technology cognition.基于技术认知中介效应的合作成员身份对农户技术采用的影响
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 20;11(2):e42130. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42130. eCollection 2025 Jan 30.
2
Socio-cognitive constraints and opportunities for sustainable intensification in South Asia: insights from fuzzy cognitive mapping in coastal Bangladesh.南亚可持续集约化的社会认知制约因素与机遇:来自孟加拉国沿海地区模糊认知映射的见解
Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23(11):16588-16616. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01342-y. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
3
Adoption of soil and water conservation technology and its effect on the productivity of smallholder rice farmers in Southwest Nigeria.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors associated with small-scale agricultural machinery adoption in Bangladesh: Census findings.孟加拉国小型农业机械采用的相关因素:普查结果
J Rural Stud. 2016 Aug;46:155-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.012.
尼日利亚西南部水土保持技术的采用及其对小农户水稻生产力的影响。
Heliyon. 2021 Mar 15;7(3):e06433. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06433. eCollection 2021 Mar.