Aravindakshan Sreejith, Rossi Frederick, Amjath-Babu T S, Veettil Prakashan Chellattan, Krupnik Timothy J
Farming Systems Ecology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
J Product Anal. 2018;49:153-171. doi: 10.1007/s11123-018-0525-y. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
Conservation tillage (CT) options are among the most rapidly spreading land preparation and crop establishment techniques globally. In South Asia, CT has spread dramatically over the last decade, a result of strong policy support and increasing availability of appropriate machinery. Although many studies have analyzed the yield and profitability of CT systems, the technical efficiency impacts accrued by farmers utilizing CT have received considerably less attention. Employing a DEA framework, we isolated bias-corrected meta-frontier technical efficiencies and meta-technology ratios of three CT options adopted by wheat farmers in Bangladesh, including bed planting (BP), power tiller operated seeding (PTOS), and strip tillage (ST), compared to a control group of farmers practicing traditional tillage (TT). Endogenous switching regression was subsequently employed to overcome potential self-selection bias in the choice of CT, in order to robustly estimate efficiency factors. Among the tillage options studied, PTOS was the most technically efficient, with an average meta-technology ratio of 0.90, followed by BP (0.88), ST (0.83), and TT (0.67). The average predicted meta-frontier technical efficiency for the CT non-adopters under a counterfactual scenario (0.80) was significantly greater ( = 0.00) than current TE scores (0.65), indicating the potential for sizeable profitability increases with CT adoption. Conversely, the counterfactual TE of non-adopters was 23% greater than their DEA efficiency, also indicating efficiency gains from CT adoption. Our results provide backing for agricultural development programs in South Asia that aim to increase smallholder farmers' income through the application of CT as a pathway towards poverty reduction. C06 ● C14 ● Q12 ● C34 ● C51.
保护性耕作(CT)方法是全球范围内传播速度最快的土地准备和作物种植技术之一。在南亚,过去十年间保护性耕作迅速推广,这得益于强有力的政策支持以及适用机械的日益普及。尽管许多研究分析了保护性耕作系统的产量和盈利能力,但农民采用保护性耕作所产生的技术效率影响却很少受到关注。我们采用数据包络分析(DEA)框架,分离出了孟加拉国小麦种植农户采用的三种保护性耕作方法(包括垄作(BP)、动力耕耘机播种(PTOS)和带状耕作(ST))经偏差校正后的元前沿技术效率和元技术比率,并与采用传统耕作(TT)的对照组农户进行了比较。随后采用内生转换回归来克服在选择保护性耕作时可能存在的自我选择偏差,以便稳健地估计效率因素。在所研究的耕作方法中,动力耕耘机播种在技术上效率最高,平均元技术比率为0.90,其次是垄作(0.88)、带状耕作(0.83)和传统耕作(0.67)。在反事实情景下,保护性耕作未采用者的平均预测元前沿技术效率(0.80)显著高于当前的技术效率得分(0.65)(p = 0.00),这表明采用保护性耕作有大幅提高盈利能力的潜力。相反,未采用者的反事实技术效率比其数据包络分析效率高23%,这也表明采用保护性耕作可提高效率。我们的研究结果为南亚的农业发展项目提供了支持,这些项目旨在通过应用保护性耕作来增加小农户收入,以此作为减贫途径。C06 ● C14 ● Q12 ● C34 ● C51。