Naab Jesse B, Mahama George Y, Yahaya Iddrisu, Prasad P V V
Savanna Agricultural Research InstituteWa, Ghana.
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, ManhattanKS, United States.
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jun 21;8:996. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00996. eCollection 2017.
Conservation agriculture (CA) practices are being widely promoted in many areas in sub-Saharan Africa to recuperate degraded soils and improve ecosystem services. This study examined the effects of three tillage practices [conventional moldboard plowing (CT), hand hoeing (MT) and no-tillage (NT)], and three cropping systems (continuous maize, soybean-maize annual rotation, and soybean/maize intercropping) on soil quality, crop productivity, and profitability in researcher and farmer managed on-farm trials from 2010 to 2013 in northwestern Ghana. In the researcher managed mother trial, the CA practices of NT, residue retention and crop rotation/intercropping maintained higher soil organic carbon, and total soil N compared to conventional tillage practices after 4 years. Soil bulk density was higher under NT than under CT soils in the researcher managed mother trails or farmers managed baby trials after 4 years. In the researcher managed mother trial, there was no significant difference between tillage systems or cropping systems in maize or soybean yields in the first three seasons. In the fourth season, crop rotation had the greatest impact on maize yields with CT maize following soybean increasing yields by 41 and 49% compared to MT and NT maize, respectively. In the farmers' managed trials, maize yield ranged from 520 to 2700 kg ha and 300 to 2000 kg ha for CT and NT, respectively, reflecting differences in experience of farmers with NT. Averaged across farmers, CT cropping systems increased maize and soybean yield ranging from 23 to 39% compared with NT cropping systems. Partial budget analysis showed that the cost of producing maize or soybean is 20-29% cheaper with NT systems and gives higher returns to labor compared to CT practice. Benefit-to-cost ratios also show that NT cropping systems are more profitable than CT systems. We conclude that with time, implementation of CA practices involving NT, crop rotation, intercropping of maize and soybean along with crop residue retention presents a win-win scenario due to improved crop yield, increased economic return, and trends of increasing soil fertility. The biggest challenge, however, remains with producing enough biomass and retaining same on the field.
保护性农业(CA)措施正在撒哈拉以南非洲的许多地区广泛推广,以恢复退化土壤并改善生态系统服务。本研究在2010年至2013年于加纳西北部开展的研究人员管理和农民管理的田间试验中,考察了三种耕作方式[传统铧式犁翻耕(CT)、手工锄地(MT)和免耕(NT)]以及三种种植系统(连续种植玉米、大豆 - 玉米轮作和大豆/玉米间作)对土壤质量、作物生产力和盈利能力的影响。在研究人员管理的母试验中,经过4年,与传统耕作方式相比,免耕、残茬保留和作物轮作/间作等保护性农业措施保持了更高的土壤有机碳和土壤全氮。在研究人员管理的母试验或农民管理的子试验中,4年后免耕土壤的容重高于铧式犁翻耕土壤。在研究人员管理的母试验中,前三个季节,耕作系统或种植系统对玉米或大豆产量没有显著差异。在第四个季节,作物轮作对玉米产量影响最大,大豆后茬种植的铧式犁翻耕玉米产量分别比手工锄地和免耕玉米提高了41%和49%。在农民管理的试验中,铧式犁翻耕和免耕的玉米产量分别为520至2700千克/公顷和300至2000千克/公顷,这反映了农民对免耕的经验差异。平均而言,与免耕种植系统相比,铧式犁翻耕种植系统使玉米和大豆产量提高了23%至39%。部分预算分析表明,与铧式犁翻耕相比,免耕系统生产玉米或大豆的成本便宜20% - 29%,且劳动回报率更高。效益成本比也表明免耕种植系统比铧式犁翻耕系统更具盈利性。我们得出结论,随着时间推移,实施包括免耕、作物轮作、玉米和大豆间作以及作物残茬保留在内的保护性农业措施,由于作物产量提高、经济回报增加以及土壤肥力上升趋势,呈现出双赢局面。然而,最大的挑战仍然是生产足够的生物质并将其留在田间。