• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新热带区山榄科的模式指定

Typifications in neotropical Sapotaceae.

作者信息

Alves-Araújo Anderson, Moraes Quélita Dos Santos, Nichio-Amaral Renara, Miranda Victor Santos

机构信息

Departamento de Ciências Agrárias e Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo-UFES, Rodovia BR 101 Norte, Km 60, São Mateus-ES, Brazil Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana Feira de Santana Brazil.

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Av. Transnordestina s.n., Feira de Santana-BA, Brazil Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo-UFES São Mateus Brazil.

出版信息

PhytoKeys. 2020 Dec 21;170:45-69. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.170.54718. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3897/phytokeys.170.54718
PMID:33442323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7769886/
Abstract

Sapotaceae is historically known as having a tricky and challenging taxonomy due to tangled morphologic heterogeneity. Consequently, this resulted in a large number of described genera and binomials. After Pennington's Flora Neotropica work, several of those nomenclature issues were resolved. Nevertheless, many binomials remain unsolved and up for typification. Thus, following the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi and Plants, we propose 74 new lectotype designations, four of these are second-step typifications.

摘要

山榄科在历史上就因形态特征复杂多样而闻名,其分类学颇具难度与挑战。因此,这导致了大量已描述的属和双名法名称。在彭宁顿的《新热带植物志》工作之后,其中一些命名问题得到了解决。然而,许多双名法名称仍未解决,有待选定模式。因此,根据《藻类、真菌和植物国际命名法规》,我们提出了74个新的后选模式指定,其中四个是第二步选定模式。

相似文献

1
Typifications in neotropical Sapotaceae.新热带区山榄科的模式指定
PhytoKeys. 2020 Dec 21;170:45-69. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.170.54718. eCollection 2020.
2
How, not if, is the question mycologists should be asking about DNA-based typification.真菌学家应该问的问题是如何(而非是否)进行基于DNA的模式指定。
MycoKeys. 2023 Apr 10;96:143-157. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.96.102669. eCollection 2023.
3
Proposals to clarify and enhance the naming of fungi under the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants.关于在《藻类、真菌和植物国际命名法规》下明确和完善真菌命名的提案。
IMA Fungus. 2015 Jun;6(1):199-205. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.01.12. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
4
Lectotypification of , a Hawaiian synonym of (Plagiotheciaceae).(曲尾藓科)夏威夷异名 的选模式指定。
PhytoKeys. 2021 Apr 21;177:11-15. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.177.64042. eCollection 2021.
5
Chapter F of the as approved by the 11th International Mycological Congress, San Juan, Puerto Rico, July 2018.2018年7月于波多黎各圣胡安举行的第11届国际真菌学大会批准的《》中的F章。 (你提供的原文中部分内容缺失,导致译文不太完整准确)
IMA Fungus. 2019 Dec 27;10:21. doi: 10.1186/s43008-019-0019-1. eCollection 2019.
6
Fungal nomenclature evolving: changes adopted by the 19 International Botanical Congress in Shenzhen 2017, and procedures for the Fungal Nomenclature Session at the 11 International Mycological Congress in Puerto Rico 2018.真菌命名法的演变:2017年在深圳举行的第19届国际植物学大会所采用的变更,以及2018年在波多黎各举行的第11届国际真菌学大会真菌命名会议的程序。
IMA Fungus. 2017 Dec;8(2):211-218. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.02.01. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
7
The current status of cyanobacterial nomenclature under the "prokaryotic" and the "botanical" code.蓝藻在“原核生物”和“植物学”命名法规下的当前状况。
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2017 Oct;110(10):1257-1269. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0848-0. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
8
Possible house-keeping and other draft proposals to clarify or enhance the naming of fungi within the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN).可能的总务和其他草案提案,以澄清或加强藻类、真菌和植物国际命名法规(ICN)内真菌的命名。
IMA Fungus. 2014 Jun;5(1):31-7. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2014.05.01.04. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
9
Lectotypification and nomenclature notes of the name (Fabaceae, Papilionoideae) and its synonyms.(豆科,蝶形花亚科)及其异名的选定模式和命名注释。
PhytoKeys. 2023 May 12;226:79-87. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.226.104110. eCollection 2023.
10
Invalid lectotypification for Boulenger, 1906 (Siluriformes, Mochokidae) by Poll (1971), and the designation of a new lectotype.
Zookeys. 2023 Oct 27;1183:65-72. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1183.111868. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Geographical-Historical Analysis of the Herbarium Specimens Representing the Economically Important Family ( Clade) Collected in 1821-2022 and Preserved in the Herbarium of the Jagiellonian University in Krakow.对1821年至2022年收集并保存在克拉科夫雅盖隆大学植物标本馆中的代表经济重要科(分支)的植物标本进行地理历史分析。
Biology (Basel). 2024 Jun 13;13(6):435. doi: 10.3390/biology13060435.
2
Typification of five plant names described based on specimens collected by Józef Warszewicz in Central and South America.基于约瑟夫·瓦尔采维茨在中美洲和南美洲采集的标本对五个植物名称进行的模式指定。
PhytoKeys. 2022 Mar 10;192:45-61. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.192.78409. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Phylogeny, diagnostic characters and generic limitation of Australasian Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae, Ericales): evidence from ITS sequence data and morphology.澳大拉西亚金叶树亚科(山榄科,杜鹃花目)的系统发育、诊断特征及属的界定:来自ITS序列数据和形态学的证据
Cladistics. 2007 Jun;23(3):201-228. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00141.x.
2
Multi-gene phylogeny of the pantropical subfamily Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae): evidence of generic polyphyly and extensive morphological homoplasy.泛热带山榄亚科(山榄科)的多基因系统发育:属的多系性和广泛形态同塑性的证据
Cladistics. 2008 Dec;24(6):1006-1031. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00235.x. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
3
Phylogeny, character evolution, and classification of Sapotaceae (Ericales).山榄科(杜鹃花目)的系统发育、性状演化及分类
Cladistics. 2005 Apr;21(2):101-130. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00056.x.
4
Species tree phylogeny and biogeography of the Neotropical genus Pradosia (Sapotaceae, Chrysophylloideae).新热带属普拉多西亚属(山榄科,金叶树亚科)的系统发育树及生物地理学研究
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015 Jun;87:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 20.