Suppr超能文献

新热带区山榄科的模式指定

Typifications in neotropical Sapotaceae.

作者信息

Alves-Araújo Anderson, Moraes Quélita Dos Santos, Nichio-Amaral Renara, Miranda Victor Santos

机构信息

Departamento de Ciências Agrárias e Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo-UFES, Rodovia BR 101 Norte, Km 60, São Mateus-ES, Brazil Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana Feira de Santana Brazil.

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Av. Transnordestina s.n., Feira de Santana-BA, Brazil Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo-UFES São Mateus Brazil.

出版信息

PhytoKeys. 2020 Dec 21;170:45-69. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.170.54718. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Sapotaceae is historically known as having a tricky and challenging taxonomy due to tangled morphologic heterogeneity. Consequently, this resulted in a large number of described genera and binomials. After Pennington's Flora Neotropica work, several of those nomenclature issues were resolved. Nevertheless, many binomials remain unsolved and up for typification. Thus, following the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi and Plants, we propose 74 new lectotype designations, four of these are second-step typifications.

摘要

山榄科在历史上就因形态特征复杂多样而闻名,其分类学颇具难度与挑战。因此,这导致了大量已描述的属和双名法名称。在彭宁顿的《新热带植物志》工作之后,其中一些命名问题得到了解决。然而,许多双名法名称仍未解决,有待选定模式。因此,根据《藻类、真菌和植物国际命名法规》,我们提出了74个新的后选模式指定,其中四个是第二步选定模式。

相似文献

1
Typifications in neotropical Sapotaceae.
PhytoKeys. 2020 Dec 21;170:45-69. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.170.54718. eCollection 2020.
2
How, not if, is the question mycologists should be asking about DNA-based typification.
MycoKeys. 2023 Apr 10;96:143-157. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.96.102669. eCollection 2023.
3
Proposals to clarify and enhance the naming of fungi under the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants.
IMA Fungus. 2015 Jun;6(1):199-205. doi: 10.5598/imafungus.2015.06.01.12. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
4
Lectotypification of , a Hawaiian synonym of (Plagiotheciaceae).
PhytoKeys. 2021 Apr 21;177:11-15. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.177.64042. eCollection 2021.
5
Chapter F of the as approved by the 11th International Mycological Congress, San Juan, Puerto Rico, July 2018.
IMA Fungus. 2019 Dec 27;10:21. doi: 10.1186/s43008-019-0019-1. eCollection 2019.
7
The current status of cyanobacterial nomenclature under the "prokaryotic" and the "botanical" code.
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2017 Oct;110(10):1257-1269. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0848-0. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
9
Lectotypification and nomenclature notes of the name (Fabaceae, Papilionoideae) and its synonyms.
PhytoKeys. 2023 May 12;226:79-87. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.226.104110. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

3
Phylogeny, character evolution, and classification of Sapotaceae (Ericales).
Cladistics. 2005 Apr;21(2):101-130. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00056.x.
4
Species tree phylogeny and biogeography of the Neotropical genus Pradosia (Sapotaceae, Chrysophylloideae).
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015 Jun;87:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验