Swenson Ulf, Bartish Igor V, Munzinger Jérôme
Department of Phanerogamic Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, PO Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden.
Laboratoire de Botanique, Center IRD de Nouméa, B.P. A598848 Nouméa Cedex, New Caledonia.
Cladistics. 2007 Jun;23(3):201-228. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00141.x.
Current generic limits in Chrysophylloideae (Sapotaceae) from Australia, New Caledonia and the Pacific islands have been shown not to correspond to monophyletic groups. In particular, revisions of generic boundaries are necessary for Pouteria and Niemeyera. We present the first cladistic study of a large representative sample from these areas based on (i) nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) sequence data, and (ii) combined data of nrDNA and morphology. The data were analyzed with parsimony jackknifing using equal weights and gaps coded as binary characters. Our results from the two data sets are highly congruent and morphological data often increase support as well as tree resolution. A basal polytomy prevents hypotheses of intergeneric relationships, but several groups receive strong support, and hence, four segregates of Pouteria (Beccariella, Planchonella, Sersalisia and Van-royena) are resurrected. Four others, Albertisiella, Bureavella, Iteiluma and Pyriluma are rejected. Niemeyera is redefined as a small genus confined to Australia. Generic limits within the sister group to Niemeyera are still unclear, a group that includes Leptostylis and Pycnandra. Furthermore, Van-royena may have originated from an intergeneric hybridization event. Traditionally used and newly identified morphological characters are scrutinized for their diagnostic value. For instance, the position of stamen insertion within the corolla tube is a strong indication of generic relationship. Unique synapomorphies are rare and genera must be distinguished on character state combinations. Following the results, several taxonomic combinations are necessary (Beccariella brownlessiana, B. macrocarpa, B. singuliflora, B. vieillardii, Pichonia daenikeri, Planchonella asterocarpon, P. dothioense, P. myrsinifolia, P. myrsinodendron and P. xylocarpa).
目前,澳大利亚、新喀里多尼亚和太平洋岛屿的金叶树亚科(山榄科)的通用分类界限已被证明与单系类群不对应。特别是,对桃榄属和尼氏榄属的分类界限进行修订是必要的。我们基于(i)核糖体DNA(nrDNA)序列数据,以及(ii)nrDNA和形态学的组合数据,对这些地区的大量代表性样本进行了首次分支系统学研究。数据采用简约法刀切法分析,权重相等,间隙编码为二元性状。我们从两个数据集得到的结果高度一致,形态学数据通常会增加支持度以及系统树分辨率。一个基部多歧分支妨碍了对属间关系的假设,但几个类群得到了有力支持,因此,桃榄属的四个分类群(贝卡里榄属、梭子果属、塞尔萨榄属和范罗榄属)被重新启用。另外四个分类群,阿尔贝蒂榄属、布雷奥榄属、伊泰榄属和吡利榄属被排除。尼氏榄属被重新定义为一个仅限于澳大利亚的小属。尼氏榄属姐妹群内的分类界限仍不明确,该姐妹群包括细柱榄属和密花榄属。此外,范罗榄属可能起源于一次属间杂交事件。对传统使用和新发现的形态学特征的诊断价值进行了审视。例如,雄蕊在花冠筒内的着生位置是属间关系的有力指示。独特的共衍征很少见,必须根据性状状态组合来区分属。根据研究结果,需要进行一些分类学组合(布朗氏贝卡里榄、大果贝卡里榄、单花贝卡里榄、维氏贝卡里榄、德氏皮乔榄、星果梭子果、多室梭子果、铁仔叶梭子果、铁仔状梭子果和木果梭子果)。