Suppr超能文献

保留神经的根治性前列腺切除术(Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy)后阴茎康复策略:随机试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Penile Rehabilitation Strategy after Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Urol. 2021 Apr;205(4):1018-1030. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001584. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite the advances in nerve sparing and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy, erectile dysfunction remains an important adverse event after radical prostatectomy. Penile rehabilitation strategies have been developed to expedite and improve erectile function recovery. However, the differential efficacy and the best penile rehabilitation strategy are unclear as yet. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to investigate and compare the efficacy of different penile rehabilitation strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search was performed in May 2020 using PubMed® and Web of Science™ databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension statement for network meta-analysis. Studies that compared the erectile function recovery rate and adverse events between penile rehabilitation treatment groups (eg medications, devices and actions) and control group were included. We used the Bayesian approach in the network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies (2,711 patients) met our eligibility criteria. Out of 16 different penile rehabilitation strategies and schedules vs placebo, only pelvic floor muscle training (OR 5.21, 95% CrI 1.24-29.8) and 100 mg sildenafil regular doses, ie once daily or nightly (OR 4.00, 95% CrI 1.40-13.4) were associated with a significantly higher likelihood of erectile function recovery. The certainty of results for 100 mg sildenafil regular dose was moderate, while pelvic floor muscle training had low certainty. The sensitivity analysis confirmed that the regular high dose of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors regardless of type vs placebo (OR 2.09, 95% CrI 1.06-4.17) was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of erectile function recovery with a moderate certainty. The on-demand doses of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors were not proven to be more beneficial than placebo. Secondary outcomes such as adverse events were not analyzed due to incomplete data in the literature. However, no serious adverse events were reported in any of the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Sildenafil 100 mg regular dose is the best penile rehabilitation strategy to improve erectile function recovery rates after radical prostatectomy. Although pelvic floor muscle training has been shown to be effective in increasing the erectile function recovery rate, well designed randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the presented early results. The on-demand dose of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors should not be considered as a penile rehabilitation strategy.

摘要

目的

尽管在神经保留和微创根治性前列腺切除术方面取得了进展,但勃起功能障碍仍然是根治性前列腺切除术后的一个重要不良事件。已经开发了阴茎康复策略来加速和改善勃起功能的恢复。然而,目前尚不清楚不同的阴茎康复策略的疗效和最佳策略。我们进行了一项系统评价和网络荟萃分析,以调查和比较不同阴茎康复策略的疗效。

材料和方法

根据网络荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)扩展声明,于 2020 年 5 月在 PubMed®和 Web of Science™数据库中进行了系统搜索。纳入比较阴茎康复治疗组(如药物、器械和操作)与对照组之间勃起功能恢复率和不良事件的研究。我们在网络荟萃分析中使用贝叶斯方法。

结果

共有 22 项研究(2711 例患者)符合纳入标准。在 16 种不同的阴茎康复策略和方案与安慰剂相比,只有盆底肌肉训练(OR 5.21,95%CrI 1.24-29.8)和 100mg 西地那非常规剂量,即每日一次或每晚一次(OR 4.00,95%CrI 1.40-13.4)与勃起功能恢复的可能性显著增加相关。100mg 西地那非常规剂量的结果确定性为中等,而盆底肌肉训练的确定性为低。敏感性分析证实,无论类型如何,常规高剂量磷酸二酯酶-5 抑制剂(OR 2.09,95%CrI 1.06-4.17)与勃起功能恢复的可能性显著增加相关,确定性为中等。按需剂量的磷酸二酯酶-5 抑制剂并未被证明比安慰剂更有益。由于文献中数据不完整,因此未分析次要结局,如不良事件。然而,在任何研究中都没有报告严重的不良事件。

结论

西地那非 100mg 常规剂量是改善根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能恢复率的最佳阴茎康复策略。虽然盆底肌肉训练已被证明能有效提高勃起功能恢复率,但需要更大样本量的设计良好的随机对照试验来证实目前的早期结果。磷酸二酯酶-5 抑制剂的按需剂量不应被视为阴茎康复策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验