• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Project ACTIVE: a Randomized Controlled Trial of Personalized and Patient-Centered Preventive Care in an Urban Safety-Net Setting.项目 ACTIVE:在城市保障体系中实施以患者为中心的个性化预防保健的随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(3):606-613. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06359-z. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
2
Effect of Individualized Preventive Care Recommendations vs Usual Care on Patient Interest and Use of Recommendations: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.个体化预防保健建议与常规护理对患者接受和使用建议的影响:一项试点随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2131455. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31455.
3
Personalized estimates of benefit from preventive care guidelines: a proof of concept.个性化预测预防保健指南的获益:概念验证。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 6;159(3):161-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00005.
4
5
Goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for early-stage Alzheimer's and related dementias: the GREAT RCT.以目标为导向的认知康复治疗早期阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆: GREAT RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(10):1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta23100.
6
7
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in UK primary care (CADET): a cluster randomised controlled trial.英国初级保健中抑郁症协作护理的临床疗效和成本效益(CADET):一项整群随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Feb;20(14):1-192. doi: 10.3310/hta20140.
8
9
CollAborative care and active surveillance for Screen-Positive EldeRs with subthreshold depression (CASPER): a multicentred randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.针对筛查呈阳性的亚阈值抑郁症老年患者的协作护理与主动监测(CASPER):一项关于临床有效性和成本效益的多中心随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Feb;21(8):1-196. doi: 10.3310/hta21080.
10
Fall prevention interventions in primary care to reduce fractures and falls in people aged 70 years and over: the PreFIT three-arm cluster RCT.初级保健中的防跌倒干预措施以减少 70 岁及以上人群的骨折和跌倒:PreFIT 三臂群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(34):1-114. doi: 10.3310/hta25340.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared Decision-Making in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.共享决策在心血管危险因素管理中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243779. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3779.
2
Operationalizing the Chronic Care Model with Goal-Oriented Care.以目标为导向的护理来实施慢性病护理模式。
Patient. 2023 Nov;16(6):569-578. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00645-8. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
3
Nursing students' experiences and perceptions of barriers to the implementation of person-centred care in clinical settings: A qualitative study.护理专业学生在临床环境中实施以患者为中心的护理的障碍的体验和看法:一项定性研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Mar;10(3):1889-1899. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1514. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
4
Personalized Disease Prevention (PDP): study protocol for a cluster-randomized clinical trial.个性化疾病预防(PDP):一项整群随机临床试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Oct 22;23(1):892. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06750-7.
5
Failure of the Problem-Oriented Medical Paradigm and a Person-Centered Alternative.问题导向医学模式的失败与以人为本的替代模式。
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr;20(2):145-148. doi: 10.1370/afm.2782.
6
Influencing Factors on Person-Centered Care Competence among Nursing Students Experienced Clinical Training.临床实习对护生以患者为中心护理能力的影响因素
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Nov 25;57(12):1295. doi: 10.3390/medicina57121295.
7
Effect of Individualized Preventive Care Recommendations vs Usual Care on Patient Interest and Use of Recommendations: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.个体化预防保健建议与常规护理对患者接受和使用建议的影响:一项试点随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2131455. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31455.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of a proven chronic disease prevention and screening intervention in diverse and remote primary care settings: an implementation study on the BETTER 2 Program.一项经证实的慢性病预防与筛查干预措施在多样化及偏远基层医疗环境中的有效性:关于BETTER 2项目的实施研究
BJGP Open. 2019 Oct 29;3(3). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen19X101656. Print 2019 Oct.
2
Priorities Wizard: Multisite Web-Based Primary Care Clinical Decision Support Improved Chronic Care Outcomes with High Use Rates and High Clinician Satisfaction Rates.优先事项向导:基于网络的多站点初级保健临床决策支持系统以高使用率和高临床医生满意度改善了慢性病护理结果。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Apr 3;7(1):9. doi: 10.5334/egems.284.
3
Patterns and Trends in Cancer Screening in the United States.美国癌症筛查的模式和趋势。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Jul 26;15:E97. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170465.
4
Clinical decision support directed to primary care patients and providers reduces cardiovascular risk: a randomized trial.临床决策支持针对初级保健患者和提供者可降低心血管风险:一项随机试验。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1137-1146. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy085.
5
Updated Review of Prevalence of Major Risk Factors and Use of Screening Tests for Cancer in the United States.美国主要风险因素患病率及癌症筛查检测使用情况的最新综述。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Aug;26(8):1192-1208. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0219. Epub 2017 May 17.
6
Patient-centered care: clarification of its specific elements to facilitate interprofessional care.以患者为中心的护理:明确其具体要素以促进跨专业护理。
J Interprof Care. 2014 Mar;28(2):134-41. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2013.862519. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
7
Improving chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: results of the BETTER pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.改善初级保健中的慢性病预防和筛查:BETTER 实用群组随机对照试验的结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Nov 20;14:175. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-175.
8
Personalized estimates of benefit from preventive care guidelines: a proof of concept.个性化预测预防保健指南的获益:概念验证。
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Aug 6;159(3):161-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00005.
9
The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses.认知行为疗法的疗效:荟萃分析综述
Cognit Ther Res. 2012 Oct 1;36(5):427-440. doi: 10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
10
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)——一种用于提供转化研究信息学支持的元数据驱动方法和工作流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

项目 ACTIVE:在城市保障体系中实施以患者为中心的个性化预防保健的随机对照试验。

Project ACTIVE: a Randomized Controlled Trial of Personalized and Patient-Centered Preventive Care in an Urban Safety-Net Setting.

机构信息

New York University Langone Health, 462 1st Avenue, Desk 2D, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

MDRC, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(3):606-613. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06359-z. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-020-06359-z
PMID:33443695
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7947038/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based preventive care in the USA is underutilized, diminishing population health and worsening health disparities. We developed Project ACTIVE, a program to improve adherence with preventive care goals through personalized and patient-centered care.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether Project ACTIVE improved utilization of preventive care and/or estimated life expectancy compared to usual care.

DESIGN

Single-site randomized controlled trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Cluster-randomized 140 English or Spanish speaking adult patients in primary care with at least one of twelve unfulfilled preventive care goals based on USPSTF grade A and B recommendations.

INTERVENTION

Project ACTIVE employs a validated mathematical model to predict and rank individualized estimates of health benefit that would arise from improved adherence to different preventive care guidelines. Clinical staff engaged the participant in a shared medical decision-making (SMD) process to identify highest priority unfulfilled clinical goals, and health coaching staff engaged the participant to develop and monitor action steps to reach those goals.

MAIN MEASURES

Change in number of unfulfilled preventive care goals from USPSTF grade A and B recommendations and change in overall gain in estimated life expectancy.

KEY RESULTS

In an intent-to-treat analysis, Project ACTIVE increased the average number of fulfilled preventive care goals out of 12 by 0.68 in the intervention arm compared with 0.15 in the control arm (mean difference [95% CI] 0.53 [0.19-0.86]), yielding a gain in estimated life expectancy of 8.8 months (3.8, 14.2). In a per-protocol analysis, Project ACTIVE increased fulfilled preventive care goals by 0.80 in the intervention arm compared with 0.16 in the control arm (mean difference [95% CI], 0.65 [0.25-1.04]), yielding a gain in estimated life expectancy of 13.7 months (6.2, 21.2). Among the 12 preventive care goals, more improvement occurred for alcohol use, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, depression, and smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

Project ACTIVE improved unfulfilled preventive care goals and improved estimated life expectancy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04211883.

摘要

背景

美国的循证预防保健服务未得到充分利用,这降低了人群的健康水平,并加剧了健康差距。我们开发了 Project ACTIVE 项目,旨在通过个性化和以患者为中心的护理来提高对预防保健目标的依从性。

目的

确定 Project ACTIVE 是否比常规护理更能提高预防保健的利用率和/或估计的预期寿命。

设计

单站点随机对照试验。

参与者

根据 USPSTF 分级 A 和 B 建议,将 140 名至少有 12 项未完成的预防保健目标的英语或西班牙语成年初级保健患者进行聚类随机分组,这些目标未得到满足。

干预

Project ACTIVE 采用经过验证的数学模型,预测和对改善对不同预防保健指南的依从性而产生的个人健康获益进行排序。临床工作人员通过共享医疗决策(SMD)流程使患者参与其中,以确定未满足的最高优先级临床目标,健康教练工作人员使患者参与其中,以制定和监测实现这些目标的行动步骤。

主要措施

从 USPSTF 分级 A 和 B 建议中未满足的预防保健目标数量的变化以及总体估计预期寿命的增加。

主要结果

在意向治疗分析中,与对照组相比,干预组的 12 项预防保健目标中,实际完成的目标数量平均增加了 0.68 项,而对照组为 0.15 项(平均差异 [95%CI] 0.53 [0.19-0.86]),这使得预期寿命增加了 8.8 个月(3.8,14.2)。在按方案分析中,与对照组相比,干预组完成的预防保健目标增加了 0.80 项,对照组为 0.16 项(平均差异 [95%CI],0.65 [0.25-1.04]),这使得预期寿命增加了 13.7 个月(6.2,21.2)。在 12 项预防保健目标中,酒精使用、高血压、高血脂、抑郁和吸烟的改善更为明显。

结论

Project ACTIVE 提高了未满足的预防保健目标,提高了预期寿命。

临床试验注册号

NCT04211883。