• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化因急诊普通外科手术结果的变异性而导致的生命损失:为什么我们需要一个国家急诊普通外科质量改进计划。

Quantifying lives lost due to variability in emergency general surgery outcomes: Why we need a national emergency general surgery quality improvement program.

机构信息

From the Department of Surgery (Z.G.H., M.P.J., J.M.H., E.G., Z.C., A.S., A.H.H.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery (J.W.S.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Emergency Medicine (E.G.), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and The Dean's Office, Medical College (A.H.H.), Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Apr 1;90(4):685-693. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003074.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000003074
PMID:33443987
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nearly 4 million Americans present to hospitals with conditions requiring emergency general surgery (EGS) annually, facing significant morbidity and mortality. Unlike elective surgery and trauma, there is no dedicated national quality improvement program to improve EGS outcomes. Our objective was to estimate the number of excess deaths that could potentially be averted through EGS quality improvement in the United States.

METHODS

Adults with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-defined EGS diagnoses were identified in the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample 2006 to 2014. Hierarchical logistic regression was performed to benchmark treating hospitals into reliability adjusted mortality quintiles. Weighted generalized linear modeling was used to calculate the relative risk of mortality at each hospital quintile, relative to best-performing quintile. We then calculated the number of excess deaths at each hospital quintile versus the best-performing quintile using techniques previously used to quantify potentially preventable trauma deaths.

RESULTS

Twenty-six million EGS patients were admitted, and 6.5 million (25%) underwent an operation. In-hospital mortality varied from 0.3% to 4.1% across the treating hospitals. Relative to the best-performing hospital quintile, an estimated 158,177 (153,509-162,736) excess EGS deaths occurred at lower-performing hospital quintiles. Overall, 47% of excess deaths occurred at the worst-performing hospitals, while 27% of all excess deaths occurred among the operative cohort.

CONCLUSION

Nearly 200,000 excess EGS deaths occur across the United States each decade. A national initiative to enable structures and processes of care associated with optimal EGS outcomes is urgently needed to achieve "Zero Preventable Deaths after Emergency General Surgery."

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Care management, level IV.

摘要

背景

每年有近 400 万美国人因需要急诊普通外科(EGS)治疗的疾病而前往医院就诊,他们面临着较高的发病率和死亡率。与择期手术和创伤不同,美国没有专门的国家质量改进计划来改善 EGS 治疗结果。我们的目的是估计通过 EGS 质量改进,美国可能避免多少例额外死亡。

方法

在 2006 年至 2014 年的全国急诊部样本中,我们确定了美国外科创伤协会定义的 EGS 诊断的成年人。采用分层逻辑回归对治疗医院进行基准测试,将其分为可靠性调整死亡率五分位数。采用加权广义线性模型计算每个医院五分位数相对于最佳五分位数的死亡率相对风险。然后,我们使用先前用于量化潜在可预防创伤死亡的技术,计算每个医院五分位数相对于最佳五分位数的超额死亡人数。

结果

共有 2600 万例 EGS 患者入院,其中 650 万例(25%)接受了手术。各治疗医院的院内死亡率从 0.3%到 4.1%不等。与最佳表现的医院五分位数相比,在表现较差的医院五分位数中,估计有 158177 例(153509-162736)EGS 死亡是多余的。总体而言,47%的额外死亡发生在表现最差的医院,而 27%的额外死亡发生在手术患者中。

结论

美国每十年发生近 20 万例 EGS 额外死亡。迫切需要开展一项全国性倡议,以建立与最佳 EGS 结果相关的结构和护理流程,从而实现“急诊普通外科后零例可预防死亡”。

证据水平

护理管理,四级。

相似文献

1
Quantifying lives lost due to variability in emergency general surgery outcomes: Why we need a national emergency general surgery quality improvement program.量化因急诊普通外科手术结果的变异性而导致的生命损失:为什么我们需要一个国家急诊普通外科质量改进计划。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Apr 1;90(4):685-693. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003074.
2
Variations in outcomes of emergency general surgery patients across hospitals: A call to establish emergency general surgery quality improvement program.医院间急诊普通外科患者结局的差异:建立急诊普通外科质量改进计划的呼吁。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Feb;84(2):280-286. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001755.
3
Reconceptualizing high-quality emergency general surgery care: Non-mortality-based quality metrics enable meaningful and consistent assessment.重新构想高质量的急诊普通外科护理:基于非死亡率的质量指标可实现有意义且一致的评估。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Jan 1;94(1):68-77. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003818. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
4
Lower emergency general surgery (EGS) mortality among hospitals with higher-quality trauma care.高质量创伤护理的医院,其急诊普通外科(EGS)死亡率更低。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Mar;84(3):433-440. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001768.
5
Evaluating the association between American Association for the Surgery of Trauma emergency general surgery anatomic severity grades and clinical outcomes using national claims data.利用国家索赔数据评估美国创伤外科学会急诊普通外科解剖严重程度分级与临床结局之间的关系。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Feb 1;90(2):296-304. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003030.
6
Hospitals with higher volumes of emergency general surgery patients achieve lower mortality rates: A case for establishing designated centers for emergency general surgery.急诊普通外科患者量较大的医院死亡率较低:建立急诊普通外科指定中心的理由。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Mar;82(3):497-504. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001355.
7
The effect of dead-on-arrival and emergency department death classification on risk-adjusted performance in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program.死亡即入院和急诊科死亡分类对美国外科医师学会创伤质量改进计划中风险调整绩效的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Nov;73(5):1086-91; discussion 1091-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31826fc7a0.
8
Acute care surgery: defining mortality in emergency general surgery in the state of Maryland.急性护理手术:界定马里兰州急诊普通外科手术中的死亡率。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):762-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.051. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
9
Emergency general surgery in geriatric patients: How should we evaluate hospital experience?老年患者的急诊普通外科:我们应该如何评估医院的经验?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Feb;86(2):189-195. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002142.
10
Use of National Burden to Define Operative Emergency General Surgery.利用国家负担来定义急诊普通外科手术。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Jun 15;151(6):e160480. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0480.

引用本文的文献

1
Interhospital variation in the nonoperative management of acute cholecystitis.医院间急性胆囊炎非手术治疗的差异。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 10;19(6):e0300851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300851. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluating potential disparities in geospatial access to American College of Surgeons/American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-verified emergency general surgery centers.评估在地理空间上获取美国外科医师学会/美国创伤外科协会认证的急诊普通外科中心方面的潜在差异。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Feb 1;96(2):225-231. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004147. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
3
Standardized perioperative management in acute abdominal surgery: Swedish SMASH controlled study.
急性腹部外科手术的标准化围手术期管理:瑞典 SMASH 对照研究。
Br J Surg. 2023 May 16;110(6):710-716. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad081.
4
Population-level trends in emergency general surgery presentations and mortality over time.随着时间推移,急诊普通外科就诊情况和死亡率的人群水平趋势。
Br J Surg. 2023 Aug 11;110(9):1057-1062. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad041.