• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性腹部外科手术的标准化围手术期管理:瑞典 SMASH 对照研究。

Standardized perioperative management in acute abdominal surgery: Swedish SMASH controlled study.

机构信息

University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Research and Development, NU Hospital Group, Trollhättan, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2023 May 16;110(6):710-716. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad081.

DOI:10.1093/bjs/znad081
PMID:37071812
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10364510/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute high-risk abdominal surgery is common, as are the attendant risks of organ failure, need for intensive care, mortality, or long hospital stay. This study assessed the implementation of standardized management.

METHODS

A prospective study of all adults undergoing emergency laparotomy over an interval of 42 months (2018-2021) was undertaken; outcomes were compared with those of a retrospective control group. A new standardized clinical protocol was activated for all patients including: prompt bedside physical assessment by the surgeon and anaesthetist, interprofessional communication regarding location of resuscitation, elimination of unnecessary factors that might delay surgery, improved operating theatre competence, regular epidural, enhanced recovery care, and frequent early warning scores. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were duration of hospital stay, need for intensive care, and surgical complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1344 patients were included, 663 in the control group and 681 in the intervention group. The use of antibiotics increased (81.4 versus 94.7 per cent), and the time from the decision to operate to the start of surgery was reduced (3.80 versus 3.22 h) with use of the new protocol. Fewer anastomoses were performed (22.5 versus 16.8 per cent). The 30-day mortality rate was 14.5 per cent in the historical control group and 10.7 per cent in the intervention group (P = 0.045). The mean duration of hospital (11.9 versus 10.2 days; P = 0.007) and ICU (5.40 versus 3.12 days; P = 0.007) stays was also reduced. The rate of serious surgical complications (grade IIIb-V) was lower (37.6 versus 27.3 per cent; P = <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Standardized management protocols improved outcomes after emergency laparotomy.

摘要

背景

急性高危腹部手术很常见,随之而来的是器官衰竭、需要重症监护、死亡率或住院时间延长的风险。本研究评估了标准化管理的实施情况。

方法

对 42 个月(2018-2021 年)期间所有接受紧急剖腹手术的成年人进行前瞻性研究;将结果与回顾性对照组进行比较。为所有患者启动了新的标准化临床方案,包括:外科医生和麻醉师进行床边快速体格检查、多学科间就复苏地点进行沟通、消除可能延误手术的不必要因素、提高手术室能力、定期硬膜外镇痛、强化康复护理以及频繁的早期预警评分。主要终点为 30 天死亡率。次要终点为住院时间、需要重症监护和手术并发症。

结果

共纳入 1344 例患者,其中对照组 663 例,干预组 681 例。新方案的使用增加了抗生素的使用(81.4%对 94.7%),手术决策到手术开始的时间缩短(3.80 小时对 3.22 小时)。吻合术减少(22.5%对 16.8%)。历史对照组 30 天死亡率为 14.5%,干预组为 10.7%(P=0.045)。住院(11.9 天对 10.2 天;P=0.007)和 ICU(5.40 天对 3.12 天;P=0.007)的平均停留时间也缩短。严重手术并发症(IIIb-V 级)的发生率较低(37.6%对 27.3%;P<0.001)。

结论

标准化管理方案改善了紧急剖腹手术后的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814c/10364510/4029a9b50e6e/znad081f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814c/10364510/9b34be2effa8/znad081f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814c/10364510/4029a9b50e6e/znad081f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814c/10364510/9b34be2effa8/znad081f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/814c/10364510/4029a9b50e6e/znad081f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Standardized perioperative management in acute abdominal surgery: Swedish SMASH controlled study.急性腹部外科手术的标准化围手术期管理:瑞典 SMASH 对照研究。
Br J Surg. 2023 May 16;110(6):710-716. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad081.
2
One-year mortality rates after standardized management for emergency laparotomy: results from the Swedish SMASH study.标准化管理下急诊剖腹手术后 1 年的死亡率:来自瑞典 SMASH 研究的结果。
BJS Open. 2024 Jan 3;8(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad133.
3
Mortality following emergency laparotomy: a Swedish cohort study.急诊剖腹手术后的死亡率:一项瑞典队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2021 Aug 11;21(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01319-8.
4
Multidisciplinary perioperative protocol in patients undergoing acute high-risk abdominal surgery.多学科围手术期协议在急性高危腹部手术患者中的应用。
Br J Surg. 2017 Mar;104(4):463-471. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10427. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
5
Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine versus propofol on extubation times, length of stay and mortality rates in adult cardiac surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.右美托咪定与丙泊酚对成人心脏手术患者拔管时间、住院时间和死亡率的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2018 May;16(5):1220-1239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003488.
6
Effects of structured intraoperative briefings on patient outcomes: multicentre before-and-after study.结构化术中简报对患者结局的影响:多中心前后研究。
Br J Surg. 2021 Dec 17;109(1):136-144. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab384.
7
Rescue bedside laparotomy in the intensive care unit in patients too unstable for transport to the operating room.对于病情过于不稳定而无法转运至手术室的患者,在重症监护病房进行床边抢救性剖腹手术。
Crit Care. 2014 Jun 16;18(3):R123. doi: 10.1186/cc13925.
8
Trainee-led emergency laparotomy operating.实习生主导的急诊剖腹手术操作。
Br J Surg. 2020 Sep;107(10):1289-1298. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11611. Epub 2020 Apr 26.
9
Perioperative nutrition for the treatment of bladder cancer by radical cystectomy.根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌的围手术期营养
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 20;5(5):CD010127. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010127.pub2.
10
Patient outcomes and provider perceptions following implementation of a standardized perioperative care pathway for open liver resection.患者术后转归和医护人员认知在实施开腹肝切除围手术期标准化护理路径后的变化。
Br J Surg. 2016 Apr;103(5):564-71. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10087. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Key interventions and outcomes in perioperative care pathways in emergency laparotomy: a systematic review.急诊剖腹手术围手术期护理路径中的关键干预措施及结果:一项系统评价
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 10;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00597-4.
2
One-year mortality rates after standardized management for emergency laparotomy: results from the Swedish SMASH study.标准化管理下急诊剖腹手术后 1 年的死亡率:来自瑞典 SMASH 研究的结果。
BJS Open. 2024 Jan 3;8(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad133.

本文引用的文献

1
The Hellenic Emergency Laparotomy Study (HELAS): A Prospective Multicentre Study on the Outcomes of Emergency Laparotomy in Greece.希腊紧急剖腹探查研究(HELAS):一项关于希腊紧急剖腹探查结局的前瞻性多中心研究。
World J Surg. 2023 Jan;47(1):130-139. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06723-6. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
2
Delay to surgery in acute perforated and ischaemic gastrointestinal pathology: a systematic review.急性穿孔性和缺血性胃肠道病变手术延迟:系统评价。
BJS Open. 2021 Jul 6;5(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab072.
3
Mortality following emergency laparotomy: a Swedish cohort study.
急诊剖腹手术后的死亡率:一项瑞典队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2021 Aug 11;21(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01319-8.
4
Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: Part 1-Preoperative: Diagnosis, Rapid Assessment and Optimization.《围手术期紧急剖腹手术护理指南》增强术后恢复(ERAS)协会推荐:第 1 部分-术前:诊断、快速评估和优化。
World J Surg. 2021 May;45(5):1272-1290. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-05994-9. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
5
Quantifying lives lost due to variability in emergency general surgery outcomes: Why we need a national emergency general surgery quality improvement program.量化因急诊普通外科手术结果的变异性而导致的生命损失:为什么我们需要一个国家急诊普通外科质量改进计划。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Apr 1;90(4):685-693. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003074.
6
A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale.临床虚弱量表的范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01801-7.
7
Risk factors for mortality after emergency laparotomy: scoping systematic review.急诊剖腹手术后死亡的风险因素:范围系统评价。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Oct;90(10):1895-1902. doi: 10.1111/ans.16082. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
8
SMASH standardised perioperative management of patients operated with acute abdominal surgery in a high-risk setting.SMASH:高危环境下接受急性腹部手术患者的围手术期标准化管理。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Mar 31;13(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05030-4.
9
High-Risk Emergency Laparotomy in Australia: Comparing NELA, P-POSSUM, and ACS-NSQIP Calculators.澳大利亚高危急诊剖腹术:比较 NELA、P-POSSUM 和 ACS-NSQIP 计算器。
J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:300-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.024. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
10
Evaluation of the Collaborative Use of an Evidence-Based Care Bundle in Emergency Laparotomy.评价基于循证的护理捆绑在急诊剖腹术中的联合应用。
JAMA Surg. 2019 May 1;154(5):e190145. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0145. Epub 2019 May 15.