• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境的不可预测性和恶劣程度如何在风险选择和时间折扣任务中影响黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)。

How environmental unpredictability and harshness affect chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in risk-choice and temporal discounting tasks.

作者信息

Sánchez-Amaro Alejandro, Tan Jingzhi, Kaufhold Stephan P, Fernández-Navarro Sofia, Rossano Federico

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego.

Tchimpounga Nature Reserve, Institute Jane Goodall.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2021 May;135(2):232-243. doi: 10.1037/com0000261. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1037/com0000261
PMID:33444032
Abstract

Animals need to adjust their decision-making strategies to the ecological challenges of their environment. Variation in ecological unpredictability and harshness thus seem to affect their decisions in the wild. In our study, we combine methods from human life history theory and previous comparative work with chimpanzees to investigate whether current variability in ecological factors such as reward unpredictability and harshness affect chimpanzees' decision-making strategies in two value-based scenarios. We presented chimpanzees with choices varying in the probability of obtaining food rewards (risk-choice task) and in their temporal availability (temporal discounting task). These scenarios were preceded by different sets of priming phases mimicking variability in resource unpredictability (predictable or unpredictable rewards) and harshness (abundant or scarce rewards). In addition, we implemented a social manipulation to explore whether variations in unpredictable gains and losses affected chimpanzees' performance in both tasks. We found that chimpanzees were only affected by the social manipulation in the risk-choice scenario. Specifically, after a period of constant food losses chimpanzees became less risk prone. We discuss how different types of negative experiences affect chimpanzees' decisions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

动物需要调整它们的决策策略以应对环境中的生态挑战。因此,生态不可预测性和严酷性的变化似乎会影响它们在野外的决策。在我们的研究中,我们将人类生命史理论的方法与之前对黑猩猩的比较研究相结合,以调查当前诸如奖励不可预测性和严酷性等生态因素的变化是否会影响黑猩猩在两种基于价值的情景中的决策策略。我们向黑猩猩提供了在获得食物奖励的概率(风险选择任务)及其时间可用性(时间折扣任务)方面有所不同的选择。在这些情景之前,有不同的启动阶段,模拟资源不可预测性(可预测或不可预测的奖励)和严酷性(丰富或稀缺的奖励)的变化。此外,我们进行了一项社会操纵,以探索不可预测的收益和损失的变化是否会影响黑猩猩在这两项任务中的表现。我们发现,黑猩猩仅在风险选择情景中受到社会操纵的影响。具体而言,在经历一段时间的持续食物损失后,黑猩猩变得不那么倾向于冒险。我们讨论了不同类型的负面经历如何影响黑猩猩的决策。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2021美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
How environmental unpredictability and harshness affect chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in risk-choice and temporal discounting tasks.环境的不可预测性和恶劣程度如何在风险选择和时间折扣任务中影响黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)。
J Comp Psychol. 2021 May;135(2):232-243. doi: 10.1037/com0000261. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
2
Computerized intertemporal choice task in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) with/without postreward delay.有无延迟后奖励的黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)的计算机化时间间隔选择任务。
J Comp Psychol. 2021 May;135(2):185-195. doi: 10.1037/com0000254. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
3
Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) transfer tokens repeatedly with a partner to accumulate rewards in a self-control task.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)在自我控制任务中与同伴反复传递代币以积累奖励。
Anim Cogn. 2013 Jul;16(4):627-36. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0599-x. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
4
The interplay between individual, social, and environmental influences on chimpanzee food choices.个体、社会和环境因素对黑猩猩食物选择的相互作用。
Behav Processes. 2014 Jun;105:71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
5
Social disappointment explains chimpanzees' behaviour in the inequity aversion task.社会失望解释了黑猩猩在不公平厌恶任务中的行为。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Aug 30;284(1861). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1502.
6
Chimpanzees can point to smaller amounts of food to accumulate larger amounts but they still fail the reverse-reward contingency task.黑猩猩能够指向较少数量的食物以积累更多食物,但它们在反向奖励应急任务中仍然失败。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Oct;42(4):347-358. doi: 10.1037/xan0000115. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
7
Trading up: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) show self-control through their exchange behavior.升级:黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)通过其交换行为展现出自我控制能力。
Anim Cogn. 2016 Jan;19(1):109-21. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0916-7. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
8
Self-Control in Chimpanzees Relates to General Intelligence.黑猩猩的自我控制能力与一般智力有关。
Curr Biol. 2018 Feb 19;28(4):574-579.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.043. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
9
Delay of gratification by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in working and waiting situations.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes)在工作和等待情境中的延迟满足。
Behav Processes. 2009 Feb;80(2):177-81. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.11.008. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
10
Captive chimpanzee foraging in a social setting: a test of problem solving, flexibility, and spatial discounting.圈养黑猩猩在社交环境中的觅食行为:对解决问题、灵活性和空间折扣的测试。
PeerJ. 2015 Mar 17;3:e833. doi: 10.7717/peerj.833. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic inconsistency in great apes.大型猿类中的动态不一致性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 5;14(1):18130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67771-7.
2
Flexible information-seeking in chimpanzees.黑猩猩灵活的信息获取方式。
Cognition. 2024 Oct;251:105898. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105898. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
3
Observational approaches to chimpanzee behavior in an African sanctuary: Implications for research, welfare, and capacity-building.非洲保护区内黑猩猩行为的观察方法:对研究、福利和能力建设的启示。
Am J Primatol. 2023 Sep;85(9):e23534. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23534. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
4
Distinct developmental trajectories for risky and impulsive decision-making in chimpanzees.黑猩猩冒险和冲动决策的不同发展轨迹。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Jun;152(6):1551-1564. doi: 10.1037/xge0001347. Epub 2023 Jan 23.