Suppr超能文献

社会失望解释了黑猩猩在不公平厌恶任务中的行为。

Social disappointment explains chimpanzees' behaviour in the inequity aversion task.

作者信息

Engelmann Jan M, Clift Jeremy B, Herrmann Esther, Tomasello Michael

机构信息

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany

Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Aug 30;284(1861). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1502.

Abstract

Chimpanzees' refusal of less-preferred food when an experimenter has previously provided preferred food to a conspecific has been taken as evidence for a sense of fairness. Here, we present a novel hypothesis-the social disappointment hypothesis-according to which food refusals express chimpanzees' disappointment in the human experimenter for not rewarding them as well as they could have. We tested this hypothesis using a two-by-two design in which food was either distributed by an experimenter or a machine and with a partner present or absent. We found that chimpanzees were more likely to reject food when it was distributed by an experimenter rather than by a machine and that they were not more likely to do so when a partner was present. These results suggest that chimpanzees' refusal of less-preferred food stems from social disappointment in the experimenter and not from a sense of fairness.

摘要

当实验者先前向同种个体提供了更受青睐的食物时,黑猩猩会拒绝不太受青睐的食物,这一现象被视为公平感的证据。在此,我们提出了一个新的假设——社会失望假设,根据这一假设,食物拒绝行为表达了黑猩猩对人类实验者的失望,因为实验者没有给予它们本可以得到的优厚奖励。我们采用二乘二设计对这一假设进行了测试,在该设计中,食物要么由实验者分发,要么由机器分发,并且有同伴在场或不在场。我们发现,当食物由实验者分发而非机器分发时,黑猩猩更有可能拒绝食物,而当有同伴在场时,它们这样做的可能性并没有增加。这些结果表明,黑猩猩拒绝不太受青睐的食物源于对实验者的社会失望,而非公平感。

相似文献

8
Chimpanzees return favors at a personal cost.黑猩猩会以个人代价回报恩惠。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 11;114(28):7462-7467. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700351114. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Bonobos respond aversively to unequal reward distributions.倭黑猩猩对不平等的奖励分配会产生厌恶反应。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Apr;292(2045):20242873. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2873. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
10
Chimpanzees and bonobos use social leverage in an ultimatum game.黑猩猩和倭黑猩猩在最后通牒博弈中使用社会影响力。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 10;288(1962):20211937. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1937. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

本文引用的文献

3
Mechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, .黑猩猩对不公平结果的反应背后的机制,
Anim Behav. 2010 Jun 1;79(6):1229-1237. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.019. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
4
Chimpanzees Trust Their Friends.黑猩猩信任它们的朋友。
Curr Biol. 2016 Jan 25;26(2):252-256. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.037. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
5
The ontogeny of fairness in seven societies.七个社会中的公平的发生发展。
Nature. 2015 Dec 10;528(7581):258-61. doi: 10.1038/nature15703. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
7
Fair Is Not Fair Everywhere.公平并非在所有地方都能实现。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Aug;26(8):1252-60. doi: 10.1177/0956797615586188. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
9
Evolution of responses to (un)fairness.对(不)公平的反应的演变。
Science. 2014 Oct 17;346(6207):1251776. doi: 10.1126/science.1251776. Epub 2014 Sep 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验