Department of Psychology and Language Research Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA.
Neuroscience Institute and Language Research Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA; Division of Developmental and Cognitive Neuroscience, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Curr Biol. 2018 Feb 19;28(4):574-579.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.043. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
For humans, there appears to be a clear link between general intelligence and self-control behavior, such as sustained delay of gratification [1-9]. Chimpanzees also delay gratification [10-12] and can be given tests of general intelligence (g) [13-15], but these two constructs have never been compared within the same sample of nonhuman animals. We presented 40 chimpanzees with the hybrid delay task (HDT) [16, 17], which measures inter-temporal choices and the capacity for sustained delay of gratification, and the primate cognitive test battery (PCTB), which measures g in chimpanzees [13-15]. Importantly, none of the sub-tasks in the PCTB directly assesses self-control or other forms of behavioral inhibition. Rather, they assess areas of physical cognition (e.g., quantity discrimination) or social cognition (e.g., gaze following). In three phases of testing, we consistently found that the strongest relation was between chimpanzee g scores and efficiency in the HDT. Chimpanzee g was not most closely related to the proportion of trials the chimpanzees chose to try to wait for delayed rewards, but rather most closely related to how good they were at waiting for those rewards when they chose to do so. We also found the same strong relation between HDT efficiency and those factors in the PCTB that loaded most strongly on chimpanzee g. These results highlight that, as with humans, there is a strong relation between chimpanzees' self-control and overall intelligence-a relation that likely reflects the role of successful inhibitory control during cognitive processing of information and intelligent decision-making.
对于人类而言,一般智力和自我控制行为(如延迟满足)之间似乎存在明显的联系[1-9]。黑猩猩也会延迟满足[10-12],并且可以接受一般智力(g)的测试[13-15],但这两个结构从未在同一组非人类动物样本中进行过比较。我们向 40 只黑猩猩展示了混合延迟任务(HDT)[16,17],该任务测量跨时间选择和持续延迟满足的能力,以及灵长类认知测试包(PCTB),它测量黑猩猩的 g [13-15]。重要的是,PCTB 中的任何子任务都不会直接评估自我控制或其他形式的行为抑制。相反,它们评估物理认知领域(例如,数量辨别)或社会认知领域(例如,目光跟随)。在三个测试阶段,我们始终发现黑猩猩 g 分数与 HDT 效率之间的关系最强。黑猩猩 g 与黑猩猩选择尝试等待延迟奖励的试验比例最不相关,而是与它们选择等待这些奖励时的等待能力最相关。我们还发现,HDT 效率与 PCTB 中与黑猩猩 g 关系最密切的那些因素之间存在同样的强关系。这些结果表明,与人类一样,黑猩猩的自我控制能力和整体智力之间存在很强的关系——这种关系可能反映了在信息认知处理和智能决策过程中成功的抑制控制的作用。