Center for Conservation Biology, William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.
The Nature Conservancy in Virginia, Virginia Coast Reserve, Nassawadox, Virginia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 14;16(1):e0244459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244459. eCollection 2021.
Predator recovery driven by single-species management approaches may lead to conservation conflicts between recovered predators and prey species of conservation concern. As part of an aggressive recovery plan, the Eastern Peregrine Falcon Recovery Team released (1975-1985) 307 captive-reared peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus) and successfully established a breeding population within the mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain, a physiographic region with no historic breeding population and a critical spring staging area for migratory shorebirds. We examined the influence of resident falcons on the distribution of foraging red knots during spring migration. We conducted weekly aerial surveys (2006-2009) along the Virginia barrier islands during the spring staging period (25 April- 6 June) to map foraging red knots (Calidris canutus) and evaluated the influence of proximity (0-3, 3-6, >6 km) of beaches to active peregrine falcon nests on knot density (birds/km). Accumulated use of beaches throughout the season by red knots was significantly influenced by proximity of beaches to active falcon nests such that mean density was more than 6 fold higher on beaches that were >6 km compared to beaches that were only 0-3 km from active eyries. Whether or not an eyrie was used in a given year had a significant influence on the use of associated close (0-3 km) beaches. From 6.5 to 64 fold more knots used beaches when associated eyries were not active compared to when they were active depending on the specific site. Historically, red knots and other migratory shorebirds would have enjoyed a peregrine-free zone within this critical staging site. The establishment of a dense breeding population of falcons within the area represents a new hazard for the knot population.
单一物种管理方法驱动的捕食者恢复可能会导致恢复的捕食者和受保护关注的猎物物种之间产生保护冲突。作为一项积极的恢复计划的一部分,东部游隼恢复团队(1975-1985 年)释放了 307 只圈养繁殖的游隼(Falco peregrinus),并在大西洋中部沿海平原成功建立了一个繁殖种群,该地区以前没有繁殖种群,是迁徙性滨鸟的关键春季集结区。我们研究了常驻游隼对春季迁徙期间觅食红腹滨鹬分布的影响。我们在春季集结期(4 月 25 日至 6 月 6 日)每周沿弗吉尼亚州的屏障岛屿进行空中调查,以绘制觅食红腹滨鹬(Calidris canutus)的分布图,并评估了海滩与活跃的游隼巢的接近程度(0-3、3-6、>6 公里)对滨鹬密度(每公里鸟类数)的影响。整个季节红腹滨鹬对海滩的累计使用受到海滩与活跃游隼巢之间的接近程度的显著影响,以至于距离活跃巢 0-3 公里的海滩上的滨鹬密度比距离 3-6 公里的海滩高出 6 倍以上,而距离 6 公里以上的海滩则高出 6 倍以上。无论游隼巢在特定年份是否被使用,都对附近(0-3 公里)海滩的使用有重大影响。具体取决于特定地点,与未使用的巢相关联的海滩上的滨鹬数量是使用活跃巢的海滩的 6.5 到 64 倍。历史上,红腹滨鹬和其他迁徙性滨鸟在这个关键集结地将享有一个没有游隼的区域。该地区游隼繁殖种群的密集建立代表了滨鹬种群的一个新威胁。