• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估 FlowOx 家庭治疗与外周动脉疾病患者标准治疗相比的成本效益的经济模型。

Economic model to examine the cost-effectiveness of FlowOx home therapy compared to standard care in patients with peripheral artery disease.

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales, United Kingdom.

School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 14;16(1):e0244851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244851. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0244851
PMID:33444396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7808667/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Critical limb ischaemia is a severe stage of lower limb peripheral artery disease which can lead to tissue loss, gangrene, amputation and death. FlowOx™ therapy is a novel negative-pressure chamber system intended for home use to increase blood flow, reduce pain and improve wound healing for patients with peripheral artery disease and critical limb ischaemia.

METHODS

A Markov model was constructed to assess the relative cost-effectiveness of FlowOx™ therapy compared to standard care in lower limb peripheral artery disease patients with intermittent claudication or critical limb ischaemia. The model used data from two European trials of FlowOx™ therapy and published evidence on disease progression. From an NHS analysis perspective, various FlowOx™ therapy scenarios were modelled by adjusting the dose of FlowOx™ therapy and the amount of other care received alongside FlowOx™ therapy, in comparison to standard care.

RESULTS

In the base case analysis, consisting of FlowOx™ therapy plus nominal care, the cost estimates were £12,704 for a single dose of FlowOx™ therapy per annum as compared with £15,523 for standard care. FlowOx™ therapy patients gained 0.27 additional quality adjusted life years compared to standard care patients. This equated to a dominant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per QALY gained. At the NICE threshold WTP of £20,000 and £30,000 per QALY gained, FlowOx™ therapy in addition to standard care had a 0.80 and 1.00 probability of being cost-effectiveness respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

FlowOx™ therapy delivered as a single annual dose may be a cost-effective treatment for peripheral artery disease. FlowOx™ therapy improved health outcomes and reduced treatment costs in this modelled cohort. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of FlowOx™ therapy is susceptible to disease severity, adherence, dose and treatment cost. Research assessing the impact of FlowOx™ therapy on NHS resource use is needed in order to provide a definitive economic evaluation.

摘要

背景

严重肢体缺血是下肢外周动脉疾病的严重阶段,可导致组织丧失、坏疽、截肢和死亡。FlowOx™ 疗法是一种新型的负压室系统,旨在供家庭使用,以增加血流、减轻疼痛并改善外周动脉疾病和严重肢体缺血患者的伤口愈合。

方法

构建了一个马尔可夫模型,以评估 FlowOx™ 疗法相对于间歇性跛行或严重肢体缺血的下肢外周动脉疾病患者的标准护理的相对成本效益。该模型使用了来自 FlowOx™ 疗法的两项欧洲试验的数据和关于疾病进展的已发表证据。从英国国家医疗服务体系分析的角度来看,通过调整 FlowOx™ 疗法的剂量和与 FlowOx™ 疗法一起接受的其他护理量,对各种 FlowOx™ 疗法方案进行建模,与标准护理进行比较。

结果

在基本案例分析中,FlowOx™ 疗法加名义护理的费用估计为每年接受一次 FlowOx™ 疗法治疗的费用为 12704 英镑,而标准护理的费用为 15523 英镑。FlowOx™ 疗法患者比标准护理患者获得 0.27 个额外的质量调整生命年。这相当于每获得一个质量调整生命年的增量成本效益比。在 NICE 愿意支付的 20000 英镑和 30000 英镑的阈值下,FlowOx™ 疗法加上标准护理分别有 0.80 和 1.00 的概率具有成本效益。

结论

作为每年一次的剂量使用 FlowOx™ 疗法可能是外周动脉疾病的一种具有成本效益的治疗方法。FlowOx™ 疗法改善了该模型队列的健康结果并降低了治疗成本。FlowOx™ 疗法的有效性和成本效益易受疾病严重程度、依从性、剂量和治疗成本的影响。为了提供明确的经济评估,需要研究评估 FlowOx™ 疗法对英国国家医疗服务体系资源利用的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d2/7808667/69a77a8b7976/pone.0244851.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d2/7808667/210a30b021ff/pone.0244851.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d2/7808667/a49b5574c3d0/pone.0244851.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d2/7808667/f0da764e1b24/pone.0244851.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d2/7808667/69a77a8b7976/pone.0244851.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d2/7808667/210a30b021ff/pone.0244851.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d2/7808667/a49b5574c3d0/pone.0244851.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d2/7808667/f0da764e1b24/pone.0244851.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8d2/7808667/69a77a8b7976/pone.0244851.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Economic model to examine the cost-effectiveness of FlowOx home therapy compared to standard care in patients with peripheral artery disease.用于评估 FlowOx 家庭治疗与外周动脉疾病患者标准治疗相比的成本效益的经济模型。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 14;16(1):e0244851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244851. eCollection 2021.
2
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Femoropopliteal Intervention Using Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty: Results From the IN.PACT SFA II Trial.药物涂层球囊血管内治疗股浅动脉病变与传统经皮腔内血管成形术的成本效果比较:来自 IN.PACT SFA II 试验的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov 28;9(22):2343-2352. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08.036.
4
5
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.心脏再同步治疗(双心室起搏)用于心力衰竭的临床疗效及成本效益:系统评价与经济学模型
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. doi: 10.3310/hta11470.
6
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Heparin Coated Versus Standard Graft for Bypass Surgery in Peripheral Artery Disease Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial.肝素涂层与标准移植物在外周动脉疾病旁路手术中的成本效益评估:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jul;56(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
7
Cost-effectiveness of low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin versus aspirin alone in people with peripheral or carotid artery disease: An Australian healthcare perspective.低剂量利伐沙班和阿司匹林与单独使用阿司匹林治疗外周动脉或颈动脉疾病患者的成本效益:澳大利亚医疗保健视角。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 May;26(8):858-868. doi: 10.1177/2047487318817910. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
8
Clopidogrel and modified-release dipyridamole for the prevention of occlusive vascular events (review of Technology Appraisal No. 90): a systematic review and economic analysis.氯吡格雷和双嘧达莫缓释制剂预防闭塞性血管事件(技术评估 90 号回顾):系统评价和经济分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Sep;15(31):1-178. doi: 10.3310/hta15310.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary and Peripheral Artery Disease Antithrombotic Treatments in Finland.芬兰的冠心病和外周动脉疾病抗栓治疗的成本效益分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jul;37(7):3348-3369. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01398-8. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
10
Editor's Choice - Cost Effectiveness of Primary Stenting in the Superficial Femoral Artery for Intermittent Claudication: Two Year Results of a Randomised Multicentre Trial.编辑精选 - 股浅动脉间歇性跛行初次支架置入的成本效果:一项随机多中心试验的两年结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Oct;62(4):576-582. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of life and utility of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD): a systematic review and meta-analysis.外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者的生活质量和效用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 21;14(1):28823. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80387-1.
2
Automated devices for identifying peripheral arterial disease in people with leg ulceration: an evidence synthesis and cost-effectiveness analysis.用于识别下肢溃疡患者外周动脉疾病的自动化设备:证据综合和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(37):1-158. doi: 10.3310/TWCG3912.
3
International Systematic Review of Utility Values Associated with Cardiovascular Disease and Reflections on Selecting Evidence for a UK Decision-Analytic Model.

本文引用的文献

1
The cost of diabetic foot ulcers and amputations to the National Health Service in England.英格兰国家医疗服务体系中糖尿病足溃疡和截肢的成本。
Diabet Med. 2019 Aug;36(8):995-1002. doi: 10.1111/dme.13973. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
2
Comparison of three generic quality-of-life metrics in peripheral arterial disease patients undergoing conservative and invasive treatments.比较三种在保守和介入治疗的外周动脉疾病患者中通用的生活质量指标。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2257-2279. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02166-0. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
3
Discounting in Economic Evaluations.
国际心血管疾病效用值系统评价及对英国决策分析模型中证据选择的思考。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Feb;44(2):217-234. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231214782. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
4
Discrete Event Simulation Model for Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Screening for Asymptomatic Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease.下肢动脉疾病无症状患者筛查的成本效益评估的离散事件模拟模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 19;19(18):11792. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811792.
5
Patient and clinician experiences and opinions of the use of a novel home use medical device in the treatment of peripheral vascular disease - a qualitative study.患者和临床医生对新型家用医疗设备治疗外周血管疾病的体验和看法——一项定性研究。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2021 Dec 3;14(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13047-021-00496-2.
经济性评价中的折扣
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Jul;36(7):745-758. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0672-z.
4
Hospital and Institutionalisation Care Costs after Limb and Visceral Ischaemia Benchmarked Against Stroke: Long-Term Results of a Population Based Cohort Study.肢体和内脏缺血与中风的住院和机构护理费用比较:基于人群队列研究的长期结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Aug;56(2):271-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
5
Wound Healing Potential of Intermittent Negative Pressure under Limited Access Dressing in Burn Patients: Biochemical and Histopathological Study.有限接触敷料下间歇性负压对烧伤患者的伤口愈合潜力:生化与组织病理学研究
World J Plast Surg. 2018 Jan;7(1):58-66.
6
Ten Year Mortality in Different Peripheral Arterial Disease Stages: A Population Based Observational Study on Outcome.不同外周动脉疾病阶段的十年死亡率:基于人群的预后观察研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Apr;55(4):529-536. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
7
Peripheral artery disease.外周动脉疾病
BMJ. 2018 Feb 1;360:j5842. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5842.
8
Development of a core outcome set for studies involving patients undergoing major lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial disease: study protocol for a systematic review and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.制定外周动脉疾病患者接受下肢大截肢手术研究的核心结局指标集:一项系统评价及采用德尔菲调查法确定核心结局指标集的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Dec 28;18(1):628. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2358-9.
9
Progression of disease preceding lower extremity amputation in Denmark: a longitudinal registry study of diagnoses, use of medication and healthcare services 14 years prior to amputation.丹麦下肢截肢前疾病进展:截肢前 14 年诊断、药物使用和医疗保健服务的纵向登记研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 3;7(11):e016030. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016030.
10
Incidence of lower extremity amputations in the diabetic compared with the non-diabetic population: A systematic review.糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者下肢截肢发生率的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 28;12(8):e0182081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182081. eCollection 2017.