• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Oncotype DX 和 Prosigna 在乳腺癌患者中的应用:一项比较研究。

Oncotype DX and Prosigna in breast cancer patients: A comparison study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

The Bolles School, High School Senior Sparks Scholar, Jacksonville, FL.

出版信息

Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021;26:100306. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100306. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100306
PMID:33444922
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oncotype Dx® (ODX) is the most used prognostic and predictive assay for ER + breast cancer (BCa) and is categorized into low (< 18), intermediate (18 to 30), or high (≥31) risk of recurrence. Prosigna® is a prognostic signature to estimate distant recurrence-free survival for stage I/II, ER+ cancer in postmenopausal women treated with adjuvant therapy. The goal of the study is to assess the agreement between ODX and Prosigna®.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

100 previously ODX classified peri and postmenopausal, early-stage (I or II) BCa patients were retrieved and Prosigna assay was performed on archived tumor blocks on a NanoString nCounter® DX Analysis System.

RESULTS

ODX assay was assigned as follows: 57% low, 39% intermediate, and 4% high. There were 8% two-step disagreements (high to low or vice versa) between ODX and Prosigna®; and 42% one-step disagreement (low to intermediate or vice versa). 78% were classified by Prosigna as luminal A and 22% as luminal B. The majority of luminal A cases (67/78; 85.9%) had low ROR score whereas ODX classified almost two-thirds (50/78~ 64%) as low RS. An insignificant percentage of luminal B cases (1/22 - 4.5%) were classified as high RS by ODX, and a modest percentage were classified as high ROR by Prosigna (15/22 ~68%). According to our follow up results, recurrence was detected in three cases. In all three cases; Prosigna was a better indicator of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The agreement between ODX and Prosigna® is low, and this has management implications, especially when chemotherapy is needed.

摘要

背景

Oncotype Dx®(ODX)是用于 ER+乳腺癌(BCa)的最常用预后和预测检测方法,分为低风险(<18)、中风险(18 至 30)或高风险(≥31)复发。Prosigna®是一种预测签名,用于估计接受辅助治疗的绝经后妇女的 I/II 期、ER+癌症的远处无复发生存率。该研究的目的是评估 ODX 和 Prosigna®之间的一致性。

材料和方法

回顾性分析了 100 例先前 ODX 分类的围绝经期和绝经后、早期(I 期或 II 期)BCa 患者,在 NanoString nCounter®DX 分析系统上对存档肿瘤块进行了 Prosigna 检测。

结果

ODX 检测结果如下:57%为低风险,39%为中风险,4%为高风险。ODX 和 Prosigna®之间存在 8%的两步不一致(高风险到低风险或反之亦然);和 42%的一步不一致(低风险到中风险或反之亦然)。78%的患者被 Prosigna 分类为 luminal A,22%的患者被分类为 luminal B。大多数 luminal A 病例(67/78;85.9%)的 ROR 评分较低,而 ODX 几乎三分之二(50/7864%)的病例被分类为低 RS。少数 luminal B 病例(1/224.5%)被 ODX 分类为高 RS,相当一部分病例被 Prosigna 分类为高 ROR(15/22~68%)。根据我们的随访结果,有 3 例患者复发。在所有 3 例中;Prosigna 是复发的更好指标。

结论

ODX 和 Prosigna®之间的一致性较低,这对管理有影响,特别是当需要化疗时。

相似文献

1
Oncotype DX and Prosigna in breast cancer patients: A comparison study.Oncotype DX 和 Prosigna 在乳腺癌患者中的应用:一项比较研究。
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021;26:100306. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100306. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
2
A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer.雌激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌中21基因复发评分与基于PAM50的Prosigna的前瞻性比较
Adv Ther. 2015 Dec;32(12):1237-47. doi: 10.1007/s12325-015-0269-2. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
3
Secondary Invasive Breast Events among Patients with Hormone-Positive Breast Cancer and High-Risk Oncotype DX Recurrence Scores 26-30 and ≥31.激素阳性乳腺癌且 Oncotype DX 复发评分 26-30 分和≥31 分的高危患者的继发侵袭性乳腺癌事件。
Oncology. 2021;99(11):699-702. doi: 10.1159/000517843. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
4
The Prosigna gene expression assay and responsiveness to adjuvant cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy in premenopausal high-risk patients with breast cancer.Prosigna 基因表达分析检测及其对绝经前高危乳腺癌患者辅助基于环磷酰胺化疗的反应性。
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Jul 27;20(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-1012-0.
5
Implications of the 21-gene recurrence score assay (Oncotype DX) on adjuvant treatment decisions in ER-positive early-stage breast cancer patients: experience of Kuwait Cancer Control Center.21 基因复发评分检测(Oncotype DX)对 ER 阳性早期乳腺癌患者辅助治疗决策的影响:科威特癌症控制中心的经验。
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2020 Mar 4;32(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s43046-020-00025-5.
6
The effect of Oncotype DX on adjuvant chemotherapy treatment decisions in early breast cancer.Oncotype DX对早期乳腺癌辅助化疗治疗决策的影响。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Nov;101(8):596-601. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0096. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
7
Correlating Predicted Adjuvant Therapy Benefit and Risk of Recurrence Between Breast Cancer Index (BCI) and the 21-Gene Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS).乳腺癌指数(BCI)与 21 基因 Oncotype DX 复发评分(RS)预测辅助治疗获益与复发风险的相关性。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2024 Oct;24(7):585-596. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.06.005. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
8
Prospective, multicenter French study evaluating the clinical impact of the Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtype-Prosigna® Test in the management of early-stage breast cancers.前瞻性、多中心法国研究评估了 Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtype-Prosigna® Test 在早期乳腺癌管理中的临床影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 18;12(10):e0185753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185753. eCollection 2017.
9
Incorporating Tumor Characteristics to Maximize 21-Gene Assay Utility: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.纳入肿瘤特征以最大限度地提高 21 基因检测的效用:成本效益分析。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jan;17(1):39-46. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7077.
10
Discordance between oncotype DX recurrence score and RSPC for predicting residual risk of recurrence in ER-positive breast cancer.Oncotype DX 复发评分与 RSPC 预测 ER 阳性乳腺癌残留复发风险的不相符性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Feb;168(1):249-258. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4514-z. Epub 2017 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Nomogram Development for Assessing Oncotype DX Recurrence Scores in Breast Cancer: A Chinese Population Study.用于评估乳腺癌中Oncotype DX复发评分的列线图构建:一项中国人群研究
Cancer Med. 2025 Mar;14(6):e70818. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70818.
2
The Evolving Role of Genomic Testing in Early Breast Cancer: Implications for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapy.基因组检测在早期乳腺癌中的作用演变:对诊断、预后和治疗的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 24;25(11):5717. doi: 10.3390/ijms25115717.
3
Computational pathology improves risk stratification of a multi-gene assay for early stage ER+ breast cancer.
计算病理学改善了早期雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌多基因检测的风险分层。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023 May 17;9(1):40. doi: 10.1038/s41523-023-00545-y.
4
Leveraging transcriptomics for precision diagnosis: Lessons learned from cancer and sepsis.利用转录组学进行精准诊断:从癌症和脓毒症中吸取的经验教训。
Front Genet. 2023 Mar 10;14:1100352. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1100352. eCollection 2023.
5
Value of the 21-gene expression assay in predicting locoregional recurrence rates in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.21 基因表达检测在预测雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌局部区域复发率中的价值:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jun;193(3):535-544. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06580-w. Epub 2022 Apr 15.