Suppr超能文献

来自捷克布拉格中央军事医院的第一波新冠疫情数据。

Data from the first wave of Covid-19 from the Central Military Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2020 Winter;69(4):164-171.

Abstract

AIMS

To process data from the first wave of Covid-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) collected in the Infectious Diseases Clinic (IDC) of the First Faculty of Medicine and Central Military Hospital, Prague. To analyse some clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of Covid-19 in the context of the Czech Republic and to compare them with the data from the most recent literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analysed data on patients admitted to the IDC between 12 March 2020 and 5 May 2020. The study cohort included 53 patients with Covid-19, 25 females and 28 males, with an average age of 57 years. The parameters analysed were clinical symptoms, average length of hospital stay, complications, and death. Additional data concerned the age, weight, smoking habits, history of comorbidities, and selected laboratory results.  These data were compared between groups of patients differing in severity of the course of Covid-19. Finally, imaging findings, serology results, and therapy outcomes were studied. Statistical analysis was performed using the SigmaStat software.

RESULTS

Eleven (20.8%) patients had a mild course of the disease, 16 (30.2%) patients had a moderate course, 22 (41.5%) patients had a severe course, and four (7.5%) patients had a critical course. The study patients presented with the following clinical symptoms: fever in 88.5% of cases, cough in 84.6% of cases, difficulty breathing in 77.4% of cases, diarrhoea in 23.1% of cases, chest pain in 17.3% of cases, and anosmia in 11.5% of cases. The average length of hospital stay was eight days. The most common complication was a bacterial superinfection, reported in 17 (32.1%) study patients. The overall case fatality rate for Covid-19 in our study was 5.7%. The average age of the study cohort was 57 years, and patients with a severe course of the disease were of older average age than those with a less severe course of the disease (p < 0.05). The predominant comorbidities were hypertension and diabetes mellitus. The analysis of the baseline laboratory data showed significant differences between the groups of patients differing in severity of the course of Covid-19 in CRP, procalcitonin, and d-dimers but not in lymphocyte count. High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan of the lungs was performed in 22 patients, and 21 of them had typical findings for Covid-19. The average MuLBSTA score for Covid-19 pneumonia severity in our study cohort was 11.5 points and was not associated with the severity of the course of the disease. Serology tests were performed in 43 study patients, with 29 (67.4%) of them turning out positive in the first test and other five (11.6%) testing positive when retested. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was given experimentally as monotherapy or in combination with azithromycin (AZI) to 24 (45.3%) patients. Two patients on HCQ therapy also received inosinum pranobexum (isoprinosine) for severe lymphopenia, one patient received convalescent plasma, six patients were given AZI alone, and one patient was treated with inosinum pranobexum alone. Altogether 37.7% of study patients were prescribed other antibiotics for confirmed or suspected bacterial superinfection. Standard clinical and pharmaceutical care was provided to patients with particular focus on the safety of off-label drug use. HCQ was with drawn in three patients due to a prolonged corrected QT interval (QTc).

CONCLUSIONS

In the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, our study patients showed comorbidities and risk factors which are consistent with the international literature, but the course of the disease was mostly moderate to severe, with a low proportion of critically ill patients and fatal outcomes. As soon as new information became available, new diagnostic and therapeutic options were introduced into routine practice. Based on our experience, we are well prepared for a possible second wave of SARS-CoV-2 in terms of the diagnostics, but the therapeutic options still remain very limited.

摘要

目的

处理 SARS-CoV-2 引起的第一波新冠疫情在布拉格第一医学系和中央军医院传染病科(IDC)收集的数据。分析捷克共和国 COVID-19 的一些临床、诊断和治疗方面,并将其与最新文献中的数据进行比较。

患者和方法

这项回顾性研究分析了 2020 年 3 月 12 日至 5 月 5 日期间入住 IDC 的患者的数据。研究队列包括 53 名 COVID-19 患者,其中 25 名女性,28 名男性,平均年龄 57 岁。分析的参数包括临床症状、平均住院时间、并发症和死亡。其他数据包括年龄、体重、吸烟习惯、合并症病史以及选定的实验室结果。这些数据在不同严重程度的 COVID-19 患者之间进行了比较。最后,研究了影像学发现、血清学结果和治疗结果。统计分析使用 SigmaStat 软件进行。

结果

11 名(20.8%)患者病情较轻,16 名(30.2%)患者病情中度,22 名(41.5%)患者病情严重,4 名(7.5%)患者病情危急。研究患者表现出以下临床症状:发热 88.5%,咳嗽 84.6%,呼吸困难 77.4%,腹泻 23.1%,胸痛 17.3%,嗅觉丧失 11.5%。平均住院时间为 8 天。最常见的并发症是细菌合并感染,在 17 名(32.1%)研究患者中报告。我们研究中 COVID-19 的总病死率为 5.7%。研究队列的平均年龄为 57 岁,病情严重的患者比病情较轻的患者年龄更大(p < 0.05)。主要合并症为高血压和糖尿病。基线实验室数据的分析显示,在 CRP、降钙素原和 D-二聚体方面,不同严重程度 COVID-19 患者组之间存在显著差异,但淋巴细胞计数无差异。对 22 名患者进行了高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)扫描,其中 21 名患者具有 COVID-19 的典型表现。我们研究队列 COVID-19 肺炎严重程度的平均 MuLBSTA 评分为 11.5 分,与疾病严重程度无关。对 43 名研究患者进行了血清学检测,其中 29 名(67.4%)首次检测呈阳性,另外 5 名(11.6%)再次检测呈阳性。对 24 名(45.3%)患者进行了实验性羟氯喹(HCQ)单药或联合阿奇霉素(AZI)治疗。在接受 HCQ 治疗的 2 名患者中,因严重淋巴细胞减少症还接受了肌苷普拉诺辛(异丁司特)治疗,1 名患者接受了恢复期血浆治疗,6 名患者单独接受了 AZI 治疗,1 名患者单独接受了肌苷普拉诺辛治疗。总共 37.7%的研究患者因确诊或疑似细菌合并感染而开了其他抗生素。对患者提供了标准的临床和药物治疗,并特别关注药物标签外使用的安全性。由于 QTc 延长,3 名患者停用了 HCQ。

结论

在 SARS-CoV-2 流行的第一波中,我们的研究患者表现出与国际文献一致的合并症和危险因素,但疾病的过程主要为中度至重度,危重患者和死亡病例的比例较低。一旦有新的信息可用,新的诊断和治疗方案就会被引入常规治疗。根据我们的经验,我们已经为 SARS-CoV-2 的第二次浪潮做好了诊断方面的充分准备,但治疗方案仍然非常有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验