Henry H H
Department of Urology, Cabarrus Memorial Hospital, Concord, N.C.
Acute Care. 1988;12 Suppl 1:22-30.
The analgesic efficacy and safety of butorphanol tartrate are discussed in 2 groups of patients who underwent urological procedures. The first group of 83 patients is presented as a retrospective review of the postoperative use of butorphanol. The second group of patients was involved in a double-blind, randomized comparative trial of butorphanol (2 or 4 mg) and meperidine (80 mg) for the relief of moderate to severe pain due to renal colic. Eighty-three patients with documented upper urinary tract calculi were evaluated for efficacy; 120 patients were evaluated for safety. Butorphanol 4 mg (i.m.) was more effective than butorphanol 2 mg (i.m.) and equivalent to meperidine 80 mg (i.m.). There were no statistically significant differences among the three treatment groups in regard to side effects. Overall, in the urology patients studied, butorphanol was found to be an effective and well tolerated agent that possesses important safety advantages when compared with the narcotic analgesics.
对两组接受泌尿外科手术的患者讨论了酒石酸布托啡诺的镇痛效果和安全性。第一组83例患者是对布托啡诺术后使用情况的回顾性研究。第二组患者参与了一项双盲、随机对照试验,比较布托啡诺(2毫克或4毫克)和哌替啶(80毫克)缓解肾绞痛所致中重度疼痛的效果。对83例有记录的上尿路结石患者进行了疗效评估;对120例患者进行了安全性评估。布托啡诺4毫克(肌肉注射)比布托啡诺2毫克(肌肉注射)更有效,且与哌替啶80毫克(肌肉注射)等效。三个治疗组在副作用方面无统计学显著差异。总体而言,在所研究的泌尿外科患者中,发现布托啡诺是一种有效且耐受性良好的药物,与麻醉性镇痛药相比具有重要的安全优势。