Law|Health|Justice Research Centre, Faculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway Australia.
J Interprof Care. 2021 Nov-Dec;35(6):953-962. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1856799. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
Research, policy and practice in the field of interprofessional collaboration have focused on how medical, nursing, allied health and social care practitioners work together to positively impact patient care. This paper extends conceptual thinking about interprofessional practice by focusing on lawyers as part of the interprofessional mix. This attention is prompted by medical-legal partnerships (MLPs), a service model by which lawyers join health care settings to assist patients with unmet, and often health-harming, legal needs. MLPs are present in around 450 hospitals and other health care sites across the United States and the model has spread to other countries, including Australia, the United Kingdom and Canada. However, enthusiasm for the MLP model is not yet matched by good evidence on how, when and for whom the model works. Interprofessional scholars contend that imprecise terminology and poor conceptualization of interprofessional arrangements hinder high-quality research and evaluation. In response to their critiques, this paper formulates a stepwise conceptual framework to guide the design, implementation and study of interprofessional arrangements that connect health, social care and legal practitioners. This framework draws on findings from national surveys of MLP initiatives in several countries and adapts several key conceptual frameworks that have been developed from systematic reviews of interprofessional working in primary health care. These conceptual frameworks are valuable because they promote clarity about different modes of interprofessional working and characterize the factors at macro (policy, funding), meso (organizational) and micro (practitioner, patient) levels that help or hinder professionals from different disciplines in working together. The paper considers factors at these three levels that require particular attention when lawyers join health care settings and proposes questions for future research in this emerging area.
跨专业合作领域的研究、政策和实践一直聚焦于医疗、护理、联合健康和社会关怀从业者如何共同努力,积极改善患者护理。本文通过关注律师作为跨专业组合的一部分,扩展了关于跨专业实践的概念性思维。之所以关注这一点,是因为医疗法律伙伴关系(MLP),即律师加入医疗环境以帮助满足患者未满足的、且往往对健康有害的法律需求的一种服务模式。MLP 在美国大约 450 家医院和其他医疗保健场所中存在,并且该模式已传播到其他国家,包括澳大利亚、英国和加拿大。然而,尽管对 MLP 模式的热情很高,但对于该模式如何、何时以及针对谁有效,还没有很好的证据。跨专业学者认为,术语不准确和对跨专业安排的概念化不足阻碍了高质量的研究和评估。针对这些批评,本文制定了一个逐步的概念框架,以指导连接健康、社会关怀和法律从业者的跨专业安排的设计、实施和研究。该框架借鉴了几个国家的 MLP 倡议的国家调查结果,并采用了几个关键的概念框架,这些框架是从对初级保健中的跨专业工作的系统评价中发展而来的。这些概念框架具有价值,因为它们促进了对不同模式的跨专业工作的清晰理解,并描述了在宏观(政策、资金)、中观(组织)和微观(从业者、患者)层面上有助于或阻碍来自不同学科的专业人员共同工作的因素。本文考虑了在律师加入医疗保健环境时需要特别关注的这三个层面的因素,并为这一新兴领域的未来研究提出了问题。