Černis Emma, Bird Jessica C, Molodynski Andrew, Ehlers Anke, Freeman Daniel
Oxford Cognitive Approaches to Psychosis, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2020 Dec 28;49(4):1-13. doi: 10.1017/S1352465820000958.
Catastrophic cognitive appraisals, similar to those in anxiety disorders, are implicated in depersonalisation, a form of dissociation. No scales exist to measure appraisals of dissociative experiences. Dissociation is common in psychosis. Misinterpretations of dissociative experiences may maintain psychotic symptoms. Therefore, assessing appraisals in this context may be valuable.
The primary aim was to develop a measure of key appraisals of dissociation in psychosis. Secondary aims were to test the relationship between appraisals and psychotic experiences (paranoia and hallucinations), and determine whether appraisals explain additional variance in psychotic symptoms above dissociative symptoms.
Fifty items were generated from transcripts of interviews with patients. The measure was developed and psychometrically validated via factor analysis of data from 9902 general population participants and 1026 patients with psychosis. Convergent validity, test-re-test reliability, and internal reliability were assessed. Regression analyses tested relationships with psychotic symptoms.
A 13-item single-factor measure was developed. Factor analysis indicated good model fit [χ2(65) = 247.173, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.960, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.052]. The scale had good convergent validity with a rumination (non-clinical: r = 0.71; clinical: r = 0.73) and dissociation measure (r = 0.81; r = 0.80), high internal consistency (α = 0.93; α = 0.93), and excellent 1-week test-re-test reliability [intraclass correlation (ICC) = 0.90]. It explained variance in psychotic symptoms (paranoia: 36.4%; hallucinations: 35.0%), including additional variance compared with dissociation alone (paranoia: 5.3%; hallucinations: 2.3%).
The Cognitive Appraisals of Dissociation in Psychosis (CAD-P) measure is a psychometrically robust scale identifying appraisals of dissociative experiences in psychosis and is associated with the presence of psychotic experiences. It is likely to prove useful for clinical assessment and research.
灾难性认知评估,类似于焦虑症中的评估,与人格解体(一种解离形式)有关。目前尚无量表可用于测量对解离体验的评估。解离在精神病中很常见。对解离体验的错误解读可能会维持精神病症状。因此,在这种情况下评估评估可能很有价值。
主要目的是开发一种测量精神病中解离关键评估的方法。次要目的是测试评估与精神病体验(妄想和幻觉)之间的关系,并确定评估是否能解释除解离症状之外的精神病症状的额外变异。
从对患者的访谈记录中生成了50个项目。通过对9902名普通人群参与者和1026名精神病患者的数据进行因子分析,开发并对该测量方法进行了心理测量学验证。评估了收敛效度、重测信度和内部信度。回归分析测试了与精神病症状的关系。
开发了一个包含13个项目的单因素测量方法。因子分析表明模型拟合良好[χ2(65) = 247.173,比较拟合指数(CFI) = 0.960,近似均方根误差(RMSEA) = 0.052]。该量表与沉思(非临床:r = 0.71;临床:r = 0.73)和解离测量方法具有良好的收敛效度(r = 0.81;r = 0.80),具有较高的内部一致性(α = 0.93;α = 0.93),以及出色的1周重测信度[组内相关系数(ICC) = 0.90]。它解释了精神病症状的变异(妄想:36.4%;幻觉:35.0%),包括与单独解离相比的额外变异(妄想:5.3%;幻觉:2.3%)。
精神病中解离的认知评估(CAD-P)测量方法是一种心理测量学上稳健的量表,可识别精神病中解离体验的评估,并与精神病体验的存在相关。它可能被证明对临床评估和研究有用。