University of Oxford Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
Oxford Centre for Anxiety Disorders and Trauma, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, The Old Rectory, Paradise Square, Oxford, OX1 1TW, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK.
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Apr;148:165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.01.049. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
A large number of mechanisms, many relating to the processing of affect, have been proposed to cause dissociation. The aim of this study was to use network analyses to identify psychological processes most closely connected with 'felt sense of anomaly' dissociative experiences. Both an undirected model and a partially directed network model were estimated using data from 6161 general population respondents collected online. The networks were used to identify relationships between dissociation and ten candidate mechanisms: cognitive appraisals, behavioural responses to dissociation, affect intolerance, alexithymia, attentional control, body vigilance, anxiety sensitivity, general self-efficacy, perseverative thinking, and beliefs regarding stress. Both models indicated a highly connected network in which dissociation had direct connections with six psychological processes: cognitive appraisals, behavioural responses, perseverative thinking, alexithymia, general self-efficacy, and beliefs about being overwhelmed. The strongest connection in both networks was between dissociation and cognitive appraisals (causal effect 0.73). The causal direction of connections could not be statistically determined with confidence, apart from the strong probability that dissociation causes meta-cognitions about being overwhelmed (98.54% of 50,000 sampled directed acyclic graphs). Both networks suggest that cognitive appraisals and factors relating to heightened (negative) sensitivity to affect are closely connected to dissociation. Dissociative experiences may arise from a high sensitivity to affect leading to threat-based appraisals that are ruminated upon and maintained by unhelpful behaviours such as avoidance. Investigation of these relationships in clinical groups, and direct causal tests, are required.
大量的机制,许多与情感加工有关,被认为会导致分离。本研究的目的是使用网络分析来确定与“异常感觉”分离体验最密切相关的心理过程。使用在线收集的 6161 名普通人群应答者的数据,估计了无向模型和部分定向网络模型。网络用于识别分离与十个候选机制之间的关系:认知评估、对分离的行为反应、情感耐受不良、述情障碍、注意力控制、身体警觉、焦虑敏感性、一般自我效能、固执思维和对压力的信念。两个模型都表明,一个高度连接的网络中,分离与六个心理过程直接相关:认知评估、行为反应、固执思维、述情障碍、一般自我效能和对不知所措的信念。两个网络中最强的连接是分离和认知评估之间(因果效应 0.73)。除了分离导致对不知所措的元认知的可能性很大(50000 个抽样有向无环图中的 98.54%)之外,连接的因果方向不能有信心地确定。这两个网络都表明,认知评估和与提高(负面)对情感的敏感性相关的因素与分离密切相关。分离体验可能源于对情感的高度敏感,导致基于威胁的评估,这些评估通过回避等无益行为进行沉思和维持。需要在临床群体中研究这些关系,并进行直接的因果测试。