From the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (D.L., C.C., J.K.), Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
From the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (D.L., C.C., J.K.), Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Mar;42(3):508-515. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6942. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
In certain clinical circumstances, dual-antiplatelet therapy can be problematic in patients with acute SAH. In some aneurysms, however, flow-diverting stents are the ideal therapeutic option. We report our experience with ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters with hydrophilic coating (p48 MW HPC and p64 MW HPC) under single-antiplatelet therapy.
Patients were treated with either flow-diverter placement alone or a flow diverter and additional coiling. Due to the severity of the hemorrhage, the potential for periprocedural rehemorrhage, and the potential for additional surgical interventions, a single-antiplatelet regimen was used in all patients.
Thirteen aneurysms were treated in 10 patients. The median age was 62 years; 5 patients were male. All had acute SAH due to aneurysm rupture. Four blood-blister, 2 dissecting, and 7 berrylike aneurysms were treated. Seven aneurysms were adjunctively coiled. Eight of the 10 patients received a single-antiplatelet protocol of aspirin, 1 patient was treated with prasugrel only, and 1 patient was treated with tirofiban first and then switched to the aspirin single-antiplatelet protocol. One device-related complication occurred, a thrombosis of an overstented branch. All stents, however, remained open at DSA, CTA, or MRA follow-up.
The implantation of flow diverters with reduced thrombogenicity due to hydrophilic surface coating under single-antiplatelet therapy seems to be an option in carefully selected cases of SAH due to aneurysm rupture.
在某些临床情况下,急性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)患者的双联抗血小板治疗可能存在问题。然而,在某些情况下,血流导向装置是理想的治疗选择。我们报告了使用带亲水涂层的血流导向装置(p48MWHPC 和 p64MWHPC)治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤的经验,这些患者接受了单一抗血小板治疗。
患者接受单纯血流导向装置置入或血流导向装置联合弹簧圈栓塞治疗。由于出血的严重程度、围手术期再出血的风险以及可能需要进一步的手术干预,所有患者均采用单一抗血小板方案。
10 例患者的 13 个动脉瘤接受了治疗。患者的中位年龄为 62 岁,5 例为男性。所有患者均因动脉瘤破裂导致急性 SAH。其中 4 个为血泡样动脉瘤,2 个为夹层动脉瘤,7 个为浆果样动脉瘤。7 个动脉瘤接受了辅助弹簧圈栓塞。10 例患者中有 8 例接受了单一抗血小板方案(阿司匹林),1 例仅接受普拉格雷治疗,1 例先接受替罗非班治疗,然后转为阿司匹林单一抗血小板方案。发生 1 例与器械相关的并发症,即过度支架化分支血栓形成。然而,所有支架在 DSA、CTA 或 MRA 随访时均保持开放。
在仔细选择的因动脉瘤破裂导致的 SAH 病例中,使用具有亲水表面涂层、降低血栓形成风险的血流导向装置,在单一抗血小板治疗下似乎是一种可行的选择。