• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于问题的协作学习促进建设性课程对齐

Question-Based Collaborative Learning for Constructive Curricular Alignment.

作者信息

Wynn-Lawrence Laura S, Bala Laksha, Fletcher Rebekah J, Wilson Rebecca K, Sam Amir H

机构信息

Imperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Jan 5;11:1047-1053. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S280972. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S280972
PMID:33447126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7802018/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We designed a curriculum mapping tool which enables medical students to access intended learning outcomes (ILOs) on their iPads in the workplace. Students were encouraged to use the online curriculum map in a specially planned teaching session: question-based collaborative learning (QBCL). The aim of the session was to empower medical students to constructively align their experiential learning with the learning outcomes of the undergraduate curriculum. In doing so, our session aimed to provide students with a greater understanding of the curriculum, improve their insights into assessment and their question-writing abilities.

METHODS

The QBCL pre-session preparation involved reviewing a patient with a presentation that aligned to the year-specific ILOs. During a 150 minute QBCL session, students received training on how to write high quality multiple choice questions (MCQs) delivered by a faculty member of Imperial College School of Medicine. They then worked collaboratively in groups and created MCQs based on their clinical encounters. Their questions were tagged to the relevant learning objective and submitted online via the curriculum map. The student-generated MCQs were analyzed using an adjusted version of Bloom's taxonomy. We also conducted a quantitative evaluation of the session.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-three questions were submitted, with 81% of questions being tagged to ILOs considered to show evidence of learning consistent with the "Apply" tier of Bloom's taxonomy. The majority of students agreed that the session was interactive (80%), thought-provoking (77%) and improved their team-working skills (70%). It gave them a greater understanding of the undergraduate curriculum (65%), improved their question-writing and insight into assessments (76%), and provided an opportunity to learn from their peers (86%). Students agreed that this session covered a variety of cases (82%) and deepened their understanding of medical conditions and presentations (87%).

CONCLUSION

We encouraged students to actively interact with the curriculum map. Students were able to achieve their own constructive alignment by writing assessment items based on real patients and linking them to the appropriate intended learning outcomes.

摘要

引言

我们设计了一种课程映射工具,使医学生能够在工作场所通过iPad获取预期学习成果(ILO)。在一次特别安排的教学课程——基于问题的协作学习(QBCL)中,鼓励学生使用在线课程地图。该课程的目的是使医学生能够建设性地将他们的体验式学习与本科课程的学习成果相匹配。通过这样做,我们的课程旨在让学生更好地理解课程,提高他们对评估的洞察力和编写问题的能力。

方法

QBCL课前准备包括回顾一名患者的病例展示,该病例展示与特定年份的ILO相匹配。在150分钟的QBCL课程中,学生接受了关于如何编写高质量多项选择题(MCQ)的培训,培训由帝国理工学院医学院的一名教员进行。然后,他们分组协作,根据临床接触情况编写MCQ。他们编写的问题被标记到相关学习目标,并通过课程地图在线提交。使用布鲁姆分类法的调整版本对学生编写的MCQ进行分析。我们还对该课程进行了定量评估。

结果

共提交了163个问题,其中81%的问题被标记到被认为显示出与布鲁姆分类法“应用”层级相一致的学习证据的ILO上。大多数学生认为该课程具有互动性(80%)、发人深省(77%),并提高了他们的团队合作技能(70%)。它使他们对本科课程有了更深入的理解(65%),提高了他们编写问题和对评估的洞察力(76%),并提供了向同龄人学习的机会(86%)。学生们一致认为该课程涵盖了各种病例(82%),并加深了他们对医疗状况和病例展示的理解(87%)。

结论

我们鼓励学生积极与课程地图互动。学生能够通过根据真实患者编写评估项目并将其与适当的预期学习成果相联系,实现自己的建设性匹配。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f7/7802018/f4a67bc099bf/AMEP-11-1047-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f7/7802018/b8514ec6bffb/AMEP-11-1047-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f7/7802018/ce6e8b69616d/AMEP-11-1047-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f7/7802018/1d62b0e095e7/AMEP-11-1047-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f7/7802018/162d2238ce8c/AMEP-11-1047-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f7/7802018/f4a67bc099bf/AMEP-11-1047-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f7/7802018/b8514ec6bffb/AMEP-11-1047-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f7/7802018/ce6e8b69616d/AMEP-11-1047-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f7/7802018/1d62b0e095e7/AMEP-11-1047-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f7/7802018/162d2238ce8c/AMEP-11-1047-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22f7/7802018/f4a67bc099bf/AMEP-11-1047-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Question-Based Collaborative Learning for Constructive Curricular Alignment.基于问题的协作学习促进建设性课程对齐
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Jan 5;11:1047-1053. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S280972. eCollection 2020.
2
Training Medical Students to Create and Collaboratively Review Multiple-Choice Questions: A Comprehensive Workshop.培训医学生创建和协作审查多项选择题:综合研讨会。
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Oct 6;16:10986. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10986.
3
What faculty write versus what students see? Perspectives on multiple-choice questions using Bloom's taxonomy.教师编写与学生所见?关于使用布卢姆认知目标分类学的多项选择题的观点。
Med Teach. 2021 May;43(5):575-582. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1879376. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
4
Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.医学生在病理学教育中创建多选题进行学习:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1312-1.
5
A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.一种由学生主导的新颖方法,用于生成多项选择题并创建在线数据库,同时有针对性地征求临床医生的意见。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):182-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011651.
6
Constructive alignment of a research-informed teaching activity within an undergraduate diagnostic radiography curriculum: A reflection.
Radiography (Lond). 2017 Sep;23 Suppl 1:S30-S36. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
7
Incorporation of Bloom's taxonomy into multiple-choice examination questions for a pharmacotherapeutics course.将布鲁姆教学目标分类法融入药物治疗学课程的选择题中。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Aug 10;76(6):114. doi: 10.5688/ajpe766114.
8
PeerWise and Pathology: Discontinuing a teaching innovation that did not achieve its potential.同伴互评与病理学:终止一项未发挥其潜力的教学创新。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Oct 14;9:27. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000027.2. eCollection 2020.
9
Climbing Bloom's taxonomy pyramid: Lessons from a graduate histology course.攀登布鲁姆教育目标分类学金字塔:研究生组织学课程的经验教训。
Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Sep;10(5):456-464. doi: 10.1002/ase.1685. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
10
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.

引用本文的文献

1
Which curriculum components do medical students find most helpful for evaluating AI outputs?医学生认为哪些课程组成部分对评估人工智能输出最有帮助?
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 6;25(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06735-5.
2
Assessment as Learning in Medical Education: Feasibility and Perceived Impact of Student-Generated Formative Assessments.医学教育中的以评促学:学生自主形成性评估的可行性及感知影响
JMIR Med Educ. 2022 Jul 22;8(3):e35820. doi: 10.2196/35820.
3
Supplementation: An Improved Approach to Question Based Collaborative Learning [Letter].

本文引用的文献

1
Training Medical Students to Create and Collaboratively Review Multiple-Choice Questions: A Comprehensive Workshop.培训医学生创建和协作审查多项选择题:综合研讨会。
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Oct 6;16:10986. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10986.
2
Comparing single-best-answer and very-short-answer questions for the assessment of applied medical knowledge in 20 UK medical schools: Cross-sectional study.比较 20 所英国医学院应用医学知识评估中的单项最佳答案题和极简短答案题:横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 26;9(9):e032550. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032550.
3
Crowdsourcing for assessment items to support adaptive learning.
补充:基于问题的协作学习的一种改进方法[信函]
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021 Jan 22;12:95-96. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S300711. eCollection 2021.
众包评估项目以支持自适应学习。
Med Teach. 2018 Aug;40(8):838-841. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1490704. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
4
Student-written single-best answer questions predict performance in finals.学生编写的单项最佳答案问题可预测期末考试成绩。
Clin Teach. 2016 Oct;13(5):352-6. doi: 10.1111/tct.12445. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
5
A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.一种由学生主导的新颖方法,用于生成多项选择题并创建在线数据库,同时有针对性地征求临床医生的意见。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(2):182-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1011651.
6
Medical school 2.0: How we developed a student-generated question bank using small group learning.医学院2.0:我们如何通过小组学习开发学生自主生成的题库。
Med Teach. 2015;37(10):892-6. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.970624. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
7
AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: a tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning.医学教育与评估指南第21号:课程映射——一种促进教学透明与真实的工具
Med Teach. 2001 Mar;23(2):123-137. doi: 10.1080/01421590120036547.