• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays.数字化与传统制作间接正畸粘接托盘的总制作时间比较研究
Turk J Orthod. 2020 Dec 1;33(4):232-238. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.18079. eCollection 2020.
2
Accuracy of indirect bonding trays - a measurement algorithm.间接粘接托盘的准确性 - 一种测量算法。
Int J Comput Dent. 2022 Sep 20;25(3):295-302. doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599775.
3
Indirect bonding: an in-vitro comparison of a Polyjet printed versus a conventional silicone transfer tray.间接粘接：一种聚喷印打印与传统硅橡胶转移托盘的体外比较。
Angle Orthod. 2022 Nov 1;92(6):728-737. doi: 10.2319/122021-925.1.
4
3D printed indirect bonding trays: Transfer accuracy of hard versus soft resin material in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical study.3D 打印间接粘接托盘：前瞻性、随机、单盲临床研究中硬树脂与软树脂材料的转移精度比较。
Dent Mater. 2023 Nov;39(11):1058-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.09.011. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
5
Comparison of Two 3D-Printed Indirect Bonding (IDB) Tray Design Versions and Their Influence on the Transfer Accuracy.两种3D打印间接粘结（IDB）托盘设计版本的比较及其对转移精度的影响。
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 26;11(5):1295. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051295.
6
Evaluating the accuracy of one-piece and three-piece 3D-printed indirect bonding transfer trays: An in vitro study.评估一体式和三件式3D打印间接粘结转移托盘的准确性：一项体外研究。
Dent Med Probl. 2024 Nov-Dec;61(6):901-908. doi: 10.17219/dmp/184145.
7
Comparison of the transfer accuracy of two digital indirect bonding trays for labial bracket bonding.两种数字化间接粘接托盘用于唇侧粘接托槽的转移精度比较。
Angle Orthod. 2021 Jan 1;91(1):67-73. doi: 10.2319/013120-70.1.
8
Accuracy evaluation of bracket repositioning by indirect bonding: hard acrylic CAD/CAM versus soft one-layer silicone trays, an in vitro study.间接粘接法重新定位托槽准确性的评估：硬质丙烯酸 CAD/CAM 与软单层硅橡胶托盘的比较，一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Nov;24(11):3889-3897. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03256-x. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
9
Transfer Accuracy of Three Indirect Bonding Trays: An Study with 3D Scanned Models.三种间接粘结托盘的转移精度：一项基于三维扫描模型的研究
Turk J Orthod. 2023 Mar 21;36(1):1-9. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2022.34.
10
3D printed indirect bonding trays: transfer accuracy of bar vs shell design in a prospective, randomized clinical trial.3D 打印间接粘接托盘：棒设计与壳设计在前瞻性、随机临床试验中的转移准确性。
Angle Orthod. 2024 Nov 1;94(6):648-656. doi: 10.2319/020524-90.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Material and Processing Lag Time on Radiant Energy Penetration and Modulus of 3D-Printed Indirect Bonding Jig Materials.材料和加工延迟时间对3D打印间接粘结托槽材料辐射能穿透及模量的影响
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2025 Mar 21. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12923.
2
The Use of 3D Printers in Orthodontics - A Narrative Review.3D打印机在正畸学中的应用——一篇叙述性综述
Turk J Orthod. 2023 Jun 22;36(2):134-142. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2022.2021.0074.
3
A Novel Digital Technique for Measuring the Accuracy of an Indirect Bonding Technique Using Fixed Buccal Multibracket Appliances.一种使用固定颊侧多托槽矫治器测量间接粘接技术准确性的新型数字技术。
J Pers Med. 2021 Sep 18;11(9):932. doi: 10.3390/jpm11090932.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative study on direct and indirect bracket bonding techniques regarding time length and bracket detachment.直接和间接托槽粘结技术在时间长度和托槽脱落方面的比较研究
Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Nov-Dec;18(6):51-7. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000600009.
2
Accuracy of positioning three types of self-ligating brackets compared with a conventionally ligating bracket.三种自锁托槽与传统结扎托槽的定位准确性比较。
J Orthod. 2012 Mar;39(1):34-42. doi: 10.1179/14653121226806.
3
Effectiveness of an indirect bonding technique in reducing plaque accumulation around braces.间接粘结技术在减少矫正器周围菌斑积累的效果。
Angle Orthod. 2012 Mar;82(2):313-8. doi: 10.2319/041811-273.1. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
4
A comparison of traditional and computer-aided bracket placement methods.传统与计算机辅助托槽定位方法的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2011 Sep;81(5):828-35. doi: 10.2319/072110-425.1. Epub 2011 Apr 28.
5
Accuracy of bracket placement by orthodontists and inexperienced dental students.正畸医生和缺乏经验的牙科学生放置托槽的准确性。
Aust Orthod J. 2007 Nov;23(2):96-103.
6
A comparison of bond strength between direct- and indirect-bonding methods.直接粘结法与间接粘结法之间粘结强度的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2006 Mar;76(2):289-94. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0289:ACOBSB]2.0.CO;2.
7
Indirect bonding: a comprehensive review of the advantages.间接粘结：优势的全面综述
World J Orthod. 2004 Winter;5(4):301-7.
8
The Burton approach to indirect bonding.
J Orthod. 2001 Dec;28(4):267-70. doi: 10.1093/ortho/28.4.267.
9
A method for light-cured indirect bonding.一种光固化间接粘接的方法。
J Clin Orthod. 1998 Aug;32(8):502-3.
10
Assessment of bracket placement and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to indirect bonding techniques.比较直接粘接与间接粘接技术时托槽放置及粘接强度的评估。
Am J Orthod. 1982 Oct;82(4):269-76. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90461-4.

数字化与传统制作间接正畸粘接托盘的总制作时间比较研究

Comparative Study between the Overall Production Time of Digitally Versus Conventionally Produced Indirect Orthodontic Bonding Trays.

作者信息

Plattner Julia, Othman Ahmed, Arnold Jassin, von See Constantin

机构信息

Private practice, Bressanone, Trentino-Alto Adige, Italy.

Department of Digital technologies in dentistry and CAD/CAM, Danube Private University, Krems an der Donau, Austria.

出版信息

Turk J Orthod. 2020 Dec 1;33(4):232-238. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.18079. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.18079
PMID:33447466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7771293/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the production time for indirect digitally and laboratory-produced orthodontic bonding trays.

METHODS

Orthodontic study casts were used in this study (n=40). The specimens were equally and randomly divided. In the digitally produced indirect bonding tray (DIBT) group (n=20), the brackets were set virtually using the Orthoanalyzer program (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) to produce an indirect bonding tray that was virtually designed and 3D printed using VarseoWax Splint material with a Varseo S 3D printer (Bego, Bremen, Germany). In the laboratory-produced indirect bonding tray (LIBT) group, the brackets were adhesively bonded to the study casts in the dental laboratory (Danube Private University, Krems, Austria), and a transfer bonding silicone tray was manufactured.

RESULTS

The t-test results showed a significant difference between the passive time during the production of DIBTs (153.8±32.8 min) and LIBTs (7 min). However, the active production time was 13.6±0.8 min for DIBTs and 17.7±1.9 min for LIBTs. Every individual process step in both groups was measured in minutes, and statistical analysis was performed.

CONCLUSION

The total production time, including active working and passive non-working time, was higher for DIBTs than for LIBTs. However, the actual active production time for DIBTs was shorter than that for LIBTs. Within the study limitations, the digital planning and production of indirect orthodontic trays can be considered a time-efficient production method.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较间接数字化制作和实验室制作的正畸粘结托槽的生产时间。

方法

本研究使用了正畸研究模型（n = 40）。样本被平均随机分配。在数字化制作的间接粘结托槽（DIBT）组（n = 20）中，使用Orthoanalyzer程序（丹麦哥本哈根的3Shape公司）虚拟设置托槽，以制作一个虚拟设计的间接粘结托槽，并使用Varseo S 3D打印机（德国不来梅的Bego公司）用VarseoWax Splint材料进行3D打印。在实验室制作的间接粘结托槽（LIBT）组中，托槽在牙科实验室（奥地利克雷姆斯多瑙河私立大学）粘结到研究模型上，并制作一个转移粘结硅橡胶托盘。

结果

t检验结果显示，DIBT制作过程中的被动时间（153.8±32.8分钟）与LIBT制作过程中的被动时间（7分钟）之间存在显著差异。然而，DIBT的实际生产时间为13.6±0.8分钟，LIBT的实际生产时间为17.7±1.9分钟。两组中的每个单独工艺步骤均以分钟为单位进行测量，并进行了统计分析。

结论

包括主动工作时间和被动非工作时间在内，DIBT的总生产时间比LIBT长。然而，DIBT的实际主动生产时间比LIBT短。在研究限制范围内，间接正畸托盘的数字化规划和生产可被视为一种高效的生产方法。