• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

WISC-V 在自闭症谱系障碍青少年中的有效性:因素结构和测量不变性。

Validity of the WISC-V in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance.

机构信息

Child Development Center, Nationwide Children's Hospital.

Departments of Pediatrics and Psychology, The Ohio State University.

出版信息

J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2021 Sep-Oct;50(5):669-681. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2020.1846543. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1080/15374416.2020.1846543
PMID:33448884
Abstract

: Assessment of intellectual abilities in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a core component of a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation. However, relatively limited information is available regarding the validity of one of the most commonly-used measures of intelligence, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - 5th Edition (WISC-V) in ASD.: We investigated the factor structure and measurement invariance of the WISC-V in a sample of 349 children aged 6-16 diagnosed with ASD using single- and multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. The comparison group was the WISC-V standardization sample.: A four-index bifactor solution best fit the ASD group data. Measurement invariance analyses indicated support for configural and metric, but not scalar, invariance of the published 5-index structure, suggesting systematic differences in performance among some subscales in ASD. The 7-subtest FSIQ scale had partial scalar invariance after relaxing equality constraints on the Coding and Digit Span subtest intercepts, suggesting sources other than theorized IQ ability contribute to lower scores on these subtests within ASD. The Cognitive Proficiency Index (CPI) failed to demonstrate appropriate fit in baseline models. The General Ability Index (GAI) had full configural, metric, and scalar invariance.: Statistical bias on the WISC-V within ASD in processing speed and working memory subtests creates significant limitations for the use of FSIQ and especially CPI index scores in ASD populations. The GAI showed strong measurement properties and should be considered as the preferred indicator of overall intellectual functioning when assessing children with ASD using the WISC-V.

摘要

评估自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)个体的智力能力是综合诊断评估的核心组成部分。然而,关于最常用的智力测量方法之一——韦氏儿童智力量表第五版(WISC-V)在 ASD 中的有效性的信息相对有限。

我们使用单组和多组验证性因子分析,在 349 名年龄在 6-16 岁被诊断为 ASD 的儿童样本中研究了 WISC-V 的因子结构和测量不变性。对照组是 WISC-V 标准化样本。

四指标双因素解最好地拟合了 ASD 组的数据。测量不变性分析表明,发表的 5 指标结构的组态和度量不变性得到支持,但标度不变性不支持,这表明在 ASD 中,一些子量表的表现存在系统差异。在放松编码和数字跨度子测验截距相等约束后,7 项测验的 FSIQ 量表具有部分标度不变性,这表明在 ASD 中,理论智商能力以外的其他因素导致这些子测验的得分较低。认知能力指数(CPI)在基线模型中未能表现出适当的拟合度。一般能力指数(GAI)具有完全的组态、度量和标度不变性。

在处理速度和工作记忆子测验中,WISC-V 在 ASD 中的统计偏差对 FSIQ 和特别是 CPI 指数分数在 ASD 人群中的使用造成了重大限制。GAI 表现出很强的测量特性,在使用 WISC-V 评估 ASD 儿童时,应将其视为整体智力功能的首选指标。

相似文献

1
Validity of the WISC-V in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance.WISC-V 在自闭症谱系障碍青少年中的有效性:因素结构和测量不变性。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2021 Sep-Oct;50(5):669-681. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2020.1846543. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
2
Measurement Invariance of the WISC-V across a Clinical Sample of Children and Adolescents with ADHD and a Matched Control Group.韦氏儿童智力量表第五版(WISC-V)在患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童和青少年临床样本与匹配对照组中的测量不变性。
J Intell. 2024 Jan 12;12(1):6. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12010006.
3
Utility of the General Ability Index (GAI) and Cognitive Proficiency Index (CPI) with survivors of pediatric brain tumors: Comparison to Full Scale IQ and premorbid IQ estimates.一般能力指数(GAI)和认知熟练度指数(CPI)在小儿脑肿瘤幸存者中的效用:与全量表智商及病前智商估计值的比较
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016 Dec;38(10):1065-76. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1189883. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
4
Does the Factor Structure of IQ Differ Between the Differential Ability Scales (DAS-II) Normative Sample and Autistic Children?智商的因素结构在差异能力量表(DAS-II)常模样本和自闭症儿童之间是否存在差异?
Autism Res. 2020 Jul;13(7):1184-1194. doi: 10.1002/aur.2285. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
5
Measurement Invariance Across Gender on the Second-Order Five-Factor Model of the German Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition.性别二因素五因素模型在德国韦氏儿童智力量表第五版中的测量不变性。
Assessment. 2020 Dec;27(8):1836-1852. doi: 10.1177/1073191119847762. Epub 2019 May 8.
6
Construct validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale For Children - Fifth UK Edition: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the 16 primary and secondary subtests.韦氏儿童智力量表第五版英国版的结构效度:16 项主要和次要分测验的探索性和验证性因素分析。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2019 Jun;89(2):195-224. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12230. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
7
A comparison of WISC-IV and WISC-V verbal comprehension index scores for children with autism spectrum disorder.比较孤独症谱系障碍儿童的 WISC-IV 和 WISC-V 言语理解指数分数。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Aug;33(6):1127-1137. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1503721. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
8
Detecting epilepsy-related cognitive problems in clinically referred children with epilepsy: is the WISC-IV a useful tool?检测临床转介的癫痫儿童的癫痫相关认知问题:WISC-IV 是一种有用的工具吗?
Epilepsia. 2012 Jun;53(6):1060-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03493.x. Epub 2012 May 3.
9
Construct validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth UK Edition with a referred Irish sample: Wechsler and Cattell-Horn-Carroll model comparisons with 15 subtests.韦氏儿童智力量表第四版英国修订版在爱尔兰转诊样本中的结构效度:韦氏与卡特尔-霍恩-卡罗尔模型对15个分测验的比较
Br J Educ Psychol. 2017 Sep;87(3):383-407. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12155. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
10
Comparison of the K-WISC-IV profiles of boys with autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.比较孤独症谱系障碍和注意缺陷多动障碍男孩的 K-WISC-IV 图谱。
Res Dev Disabil. 2020 Feb;97:103539. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103539. Epub 2019 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The value of intellectual structural imbalance in the differentiation of autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.智力结构失衡在自闭症谱系障碍和注意力缺陷多动障碍鉴别中的价值
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 14;16:1610278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1610278. eCollection 2025.
2
Methodological challenges and opportunities when studying the course of autism.研究自闭症病程时的方法学挑战与机遇。
Autism. 2025 May 22:13623613251341012. doi: 10.1177/13623613251341012.
3
Evaluating the factor structure of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) in adults with congenital heart disease.
评估先天性心脏病成人中韦氏成人智力量表第四版(WAIS-IV)的因子结构。
Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Dec 31:1-12. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2024.2442424.
4
Measurement invariance of the PROMIS emotional distress and subjective well-being domains among autistic and General Population adolescents.自闭症和普通人群青少年中 PROMIS 情绪困扰和主观幸福感领域的测量不变性。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):3003-3012. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03742-9. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
5
Brain glutathione and GABA+ levels in autistic children.自闭症儿童大脑中的谷胱甘肽和 GABA+水平。
Autism Res. 2024 Mar;17(3):512-528. doi: 10.1002/aur.3097. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
6
Measurement Invariance of the WISC-V across a Clinical Sample of Children and Adolescents with ADHD and a Matched Control Group.韦氏儿童智力量表第五版(WISC-V)在患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童和青少年临床样本与匹配对照组中的测量不变性。
J Intell. 2024 Jan 12;12(1):6. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12010006.
7
The Physiology of Cognition in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Current and Future Challenges.自闭症谱系障碍中的认知生理学:当前与未来的挑战
Cureus. 2023 Oct 6;15(10):e46581. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46581. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Cognitive Profile in Autism and ADHD: A Meta-Analysis of Performance on the WAIS-IV and WISC-V.自闭症和注意缺陷多动障碍患者的认知特征:WAIS-IV 和 WISC-V 测试表现的荟萃分析。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 May 21;39(4):498-515. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acad073.
9
Accounting for Intraindividual Profiles in the Wechsler Intelligence Scales Improves the Prediction of School Performance.考虑韦氏智力量表中的个体内部特征可改善对学业成绩的预测。
Children (Basel). 2022 Oct 27;9(11):1635. doi: 10.3390/children9111635.
10
Comparison of Mathematics Problem-Solving Abilities in Autistic and Non-autistic Children: the Influence of Cognitive Profile.自闭症与非自闭症儿童数学问题解决能力比较:认知特征的影响。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Jan;54(1):353-365. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05802-w. Epub 2022 Nov 1.