Suppr超能文献

当将 27328 例脊柱手术过程的纵向数据应用于 9 个国家的 EQ-5D-3L 值集时,EQ-5D-3L 指数分布的性质。

Properties of the EQ-5D-3L index distribution when longitudinal data from 27,328 spine surgery procedures are applied to nine national EQ-5D-3L value sets.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Orebro University School of Medical Sciences and Orebro University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden.

University Health Care Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2021 May;30(5):1467-1475. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02749-2. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the current study was to apply a single large longitudinal EQ-5D-3L data set to several national EQ-5D-3L value sets and explore differences in EQ-5D-3L index density functions and effect sizes before and after treatment.

METHODS

Patients, surgically treated for lumbar spinal stenosis or lumbar disk herniation between 2007 and 2017, were recruited from the national Swedish spine register. A total of 27,328 procedures were eligible for analysis. The EQ-5D health states were coded to EQ-5D-3L summary indices using value sets for 9 countries: Argentina, Australia, Canada, China, Germany, Italy, Sweden, the UK, and the US. The EQ-5D-3L summary index distributions were then estimated with kernel density estimation. The change in EQ-5D-3L index before and after treatment was evaluated with the standardized response mean (SRM).

RESULTS

There was a high variability in the resulting EQ-5D-3L index density functions. There were also considerable differences in EQ-5D-3L index density functions before and after treatment using the same value set. Effect sizes of 2-year change (SRM), however, were similar when the 9 value sets were applied on pre- and post-treatment data.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a marked variability in EQ-5D-3L index density functions when a single large data set was applied to 9 national EQ-5D-3L value sets. Consequently, studies that aggregate international data, e.g. meta-analyses, may produce misleading results if the underlying differences in EQ-5D-3L index density functions are inadequately handled. On the basis of the results of our study, we recommend against pooling of different national EQ-5D-3L index data.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在将一个大型的 EQ-5D-3L 纵向数据集应用于多个国家的 EQ-5D-3L 值集,并探讨治疗前后 EQ-5D-3L 指数密度函数和效应量的差异。

方法

本研究从全国性的瑞典脊柱登记处招募了 2007 年至 2017 年间接受手术治疗的腰椎椎管狭窄症或腰椎间盘突出症患者。共有 27328 例手术符合分析条件。使用来自 9 个国家(阿根廷、澳大利亚、加拿大、中国、德国、意大利、瑞典、英国和美国)的 EQ-5D 值集将 EQ-5D 健康状况编码为 EQ-5D-3L 综合指数。然后,使用核密度估计法估计 EQ-5D-3L 综合指数分布。使用标准化反应均值(SRM)评估治疗前后 EQ-5D-3L 指数的变化。

结果

得出的 EQ-5D-3L 指数密度函数存在高度变异性。使用相同的价值集,治疗前后 EQ-5D-3L 指数密度函数也存在较大差异。然而,当将 9 个价值集应用于治疗前后的数据时,2 年变化的效应量(SRM)相似。

结论

我们发现,当将一个大型数据集应用于 9 个国家的 EQ-5D-3L 价值集时,EQ-5D-3L 指数密度函数存在显著的变异性。因此,如果对 EQ-5D-3L 指数密度函数的潜在差异处理不当,汇总国际数据的研究(例如荟萃分析)可能会产生误导性结果。基于本研究的结果,我们建议不要对不同国家的 EQ-5D-3L 指数数据进行汇总。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验