Suppr超能文献

在成人普通人群样本中针对饮酒全貌进行简短酒精干预的效果:一项随机对照试验。

Effects of a brief alcohol intervention addressing the full spectrum of drinking in an adult general population sample: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Institute and Policlinic of Occupational and Social Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Institute of Community Medicine, Department of Prevention Research and Social Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

Addiction. 2021 Aug;116(8):2056-2066. doi: 10.1111/add.15412. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Evidence for efficacy of brief alcohol interventions (BAIs) is mainly limited to primary care and at-risk drinkers. The aim was to test the efficacy of a BAI addressing the full spectrum of alcohol use in a general population sample and across alcohol risk groups.

DESIGN

Two-parallel-group randomized controlled trial (allocation ratio 1:1) with post-baseline assessments at months 3, 6 and 12.

SETTING

One municipal registry office in Germany responsible for registration, passport and vehicle admission issues.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1646 proactively recruited 18-64-year-old adults with past year alcohol use (56% women, 66% low-risk drinkers) were randomized to intervention (n = 815) or control (n = 831).

INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR

The intervention consisted of assessment plus computer-generated individualized feedback letters at baseline and months 3 and 6. Comparator was assessment only.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcome was change in the self-reported number of drinks/week from baseline to 12 months. Changes at 3 and 6 months were secondary outcomes. Moderator was alcohol risk group (low-risk versus at-risk drinking) according to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption, with scores from 1-3 (women) and from 1-4 (men) indicating low-risk drinking.

FINDINGS

For the whole sample, significant group differences were observed neither at 12-month follow-up [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.87-1.17, Bayes factor (BE) = 0.52] nor at previous assessments (month 3: IRR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.92-1.12, BE = 0.41; month 6: IRR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.81-1.07, BE = 1.10). Moderator analyses revealed that low-risk drinkers were more likely to benefit from BAI only at month 6 than at-risk drinkers (IRR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.70-0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

In a randomized controlled trial, there was no clear evidence for efficacy of a computer-based brief alcohol intervention in a general population sample, but there was some evidence of medium-term benefits in the large but understudied group of low-risk drinkers.

摘要

背景与目的

简短酒精干预(BAI)的有效性证据主要局限于初级保健和高危饮酒者。本研究旨在检验一种针对一般人群和各酒精风险组的全面饮酒行为的 BAI 的疗效。

设计

一项平行分组随机对照试验(分配比为 1:1),在基线后 3、6 和 12 个月进行评估。

地点

德国一个负责注册、护照和车辆准入问题的市政登记处。

参与者

共招募了 1646 名年龄在 18-64 岁之间、过去一年有饮酒行为的成年人(56%为女性,66%为低风险饮酒者),随机分为干预组(n=815)和对照组(n=831)。

干预和对照

干预措施包括基线和 3 个月和 6 个月时的评估以及计算机生成的个体化反馈信。对照组仅接受评估。

测量

主要结局是从基线到 12 个月时自我报告的每周饮酒量的变化。3 个月和 6 个月时的变化为次要结局。根据酒精使用障碍识别测试-摄入量,酒精风险组(低风险与高危饮酒)为调节因素,女性得分为 1-3 分,男性得分为 1-4 分表示低风险饮酒。

结果

在整个样本中,在 12 个月的随访中未观察到组间差异(发生率比(IRR)=1.01,95%置信区间(CI)=0.87-1.17,贝叶斯因子(BE)=0.52),也未在先前的评估中观察到差异(3 个月时:IRR=1.01,95%CI=0.92-1.12,BE=0.41;6 个月时:IRR=0.93,95%CI=0.81-1.07,BE=1.10)。调节分析显示,只有在 6 个月时,低风险饮酒者比高危饮酒者更有可能从 BAI 中受益(IRR=0.77,95%CI=0.70-0.86)。

结论

在一项随机对照试验中,针对一般人群样本,基于计算机的简短酒精干预措施并没有明显的疗效证据,但在低风险饮酒者这一大型但研究不足的人群中,有一些中期获益的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验