Spijkerman Renske, Roek Marion A E, Vermulst Ad, Lemmers Lex, Huiberts Annemarie, Engels Rutger C M E
Department of Developmental Psychopathology, Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 19;12(5):e65. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1465.
Current insights indicate that Web-based delivery may enhance the implementation of brief alcohol interventions. Previous research showed that electronically delivered brief alcohol interventions decreased alcohol use in college students and adult problem drinkers. To date, no study has investigated the effectiveness of Web-based brief alcohol interventions in reducing alcohol use in younger populations.
The present study tested 2 main hypotheses, that is, whether an online multicomponent brief alcohol intervention was effective in reducing alcohol use among 15- to 20-year-old binge drinkers and whether inclusion of normative feedback would increase the effectiveness of this intervention. In additional analyses, we examined possible moderation effects of participant's sex, which we had not a priori hypothesized.
A total of 575 online panel members (aged 15 to 20 years) who were screened as binge drinkers were randomly assigned to (1) a Web-based brief alcohol intervention without normative feedback, (2) a Web-based brief alcohol intervention with normative feedback, or (3) a control group (no intervention). Alcohol use and moderate drinking were assessed at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months after the intervention. Separate analyses were conducted for participants in the original sample (n = 575) and those who completed both posttests (n = 278). Missing values in the original sample were imputed by using the multiple imputation procedure of PASW Statistics 18.
Main effects of the intervention were found only in the multiple imputed dataset for the original sample suggesting that the intervention without normative feedback reduced weekly drinking in the total group both 1 and 3 months after the intervention (n =575, at the 1-month follow-up, beta = -.24, P = .05; at the 3-month follow-up, beta = -.25, P = .04). Furthermore, the intervention with normative feedback reduced weekly drinking only at 1 month after the intervention (n=575, beta = -.24, P = .008). There was also a marginally significant trend of the intervention without normative feedback on responsible drinking at the 3-month follow-up (n =575, beta = .40, P =.07) implying a small increase in moderate drinking at the 3-month follow-up. Additional analyses on both datasets testing our post hoc hypothesis about a possible differential intervention effect for males and females revealed that this was the case for the impact of the intervention without normative feedback on weekly drinking and moderate drinking at the 1-month follow-up (weekly drinking for n = 278, beta = -.80, P = .01, and for n = 575, beta = -.69, P = .009; moderate drinking for n = 278, odds ratio [OR] = 3.76, confidence interval [CI] 1.05 - 13.49, P = .04, and for n = 575, OR = 3.00, CI = 0.89 - 10.12, P = .08) and at the 3-month follow-up (weekly drinking for n = 278, beta = -.58, P = .05, and for n = 575, beta = -.75, P = .004; moderate drinking for n = 278, OR = 4.34, CI = 1.18 - 15.95, P = .04, and for n = 575, OR = 3.65, CI = 1.44 - 9.25, P = .006). Furthermore, both datasets showed an interaction effect between the intervention with normative feedback and participant's sex on weekly alcohol use at the 1-month follow-up (for n = 278, beta = -.74, P =.02, and for n = 575, beta = -.64, P =.01) and for moderate drinking at the 3-month follow-up (for n = 278, OR = 3.10, CI = 0.81 - 11.85, P = .07, and for n = 575, OR = 3.00, CI = 1.23 - 7.27, P = .01). Post hoc probing indicated that males who received the intervention showed less weekly drinking and were more likely to drink moderately at 1 month and at 3 months following the intervention. For females, the interventions yielded no effects: the intervention without normative feedback even showed a small unfavorable effect at the 1-month follow-up.
The present study demonstrated that exposure to a Web-based brief alcohol intervention generated a decrease in weekly drinking among 15- to 20-year-old binge drinkers but did not encourage moderate drinking in the total sample. Additional analyses revealed that intervention effects were most prominent in males resulting in less weekly alcohol use and higher levels of moderate drinking among 15- to 20-year-old males over a period of 1 to 3 months.
ISRCTN50512934; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN50512934/ (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5usICa3Tx).
目前的见解表明,基于网络的干预方式可能会促进简短酒精干预措施的实施。先前的研究表明,通过电子方式提供的简短酒精干预措施可减少大学生和成年问题饮酒者的酒精摄入量。迄今为止,尚无研究调查基于网络的简短酒精干预措施在减少年轻人群体酒精使用方面的有效性。
本研究检验了两个主要假设,即在线多成分简短酒精干预措施在减少15至20岁暴饮者酒精使用方面是否有效,以及纳入规范反馈是否会增强该干预措施的效果。在额外的分析中,我们研究了参与者性别可能产生的调节作用,这是我们事先未作假设的。
共有575名经筛查为暴饮者的在线小组成员(年龄在15至20岁之间)被随机分配到以下三组:(1)无规范反馈的基于网络的简短酒精干预组;(2)有规范反馈的基于网络的简短酒精干预组;或(3)对照组(无干预)。在干预前、干预后1个月和3个月对酒精使用情况和适度饮酒情况进行评估。对原始样本中的参与者(n = 575)和完成两次测试后的参与者(n = 278)分别进行分析。原始样本中的缺失值采用PASW Statistics 18的多重插补程序进行插补。
干预的主要效果仅在原始样本的多重插补数据集中发现,这表明无规范反馈的干预措施在干预后1个月和3个月均减少了总体人群的每周饮酒量(n = 575,在1个月随访时β = -0.24,P = 0.05;在3个月随访时β = -0.25,P = 0.04)。此外,有规范反馈的干预措施仅在干预后1个月减少了每周饮酒量(n = 575,β = -0.24,P = 0.008)。在3个月随访时,无规范反馈的干预措施对适度饮酒也有微弱的显著趋势(n = 575,β = 0.40,P = 0.07),这意味着在3个月随访时适度饮酒略有增加。对两个数据集进行的额外分析检验了我们关于男性和女性可能存在不同干预效果的事后假设,结果表明,在1个月随访时,无规范反馈的干预措施对每周饮酒量和适度饮酒的影响确实存在差异(每周饮酒量,n = 278时β = -0.80,P = 0.01;n = 575时β = -0.69,P = 0.009;适度饮酒,n = 278时比值比[OR] = 3.76,置信区间[CI] 1.05 - 13.49,P = 0.04;n = 575时OR = 3.00,CI = 0.89 - 10.12,P = 0.08),在3个月随访时也是如此(每周饮酒量,n = 278时β = -0.58,P = 0.05;n = 575时β = -0.75,P = 0.004;适度饮酒,n = 278时OR = 4.34,CI = 1.18 - 15.95,P = 0.04;n = 575时OR = 3.65,CI = 1.44 - 9.25,P = 0.006)。此外,两个数据集均显示,在1个月随访时,有规范反馈的干预措施与参与者性别在每周酒精使用量上存在交互作用(n = 278时β = -0.74,P = 0.02;n = 575时β = -0.64,P = 0.01),在3个月随访时,在适度饮酒方面也存在交互作用(n = 278时OR = 3.10,CI = 0.81 - 11.85,P = 0.07;n = 575时OR = 3.00,CI = 1.23 - 7.27,P = 0.01)。事后探究表明,接受干预的男性在干预后1个月和3个月每周饮酒量减少,且更有可能适度饮酒。对于女性,干预措施没有效果:无规范反馈的干预措施在1个月随访时甚至显示出轻微的不利影响。
本研究表明,接受基于网络的简短酒精干预措施可使15至20岁暴饮者的每周饮酒量减少,但并未在总体样本中促进适度饮酒。额外分析表明,干预效果在男性中最为显著,导致15至20岁男性在1至3个月内每周酒精使用量减少,适度饮酒水平提高。
ISRCTN50512934;http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN50512934/(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/5usICa3Tx)。