Department of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2021 Feb;39(2):123-130. doi: 10.1089/photob.2020.4916. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
The aim of our retrospective study is to compare the long-term recurrence rate of the benign oral squamous papilloma (OSP) with different laser-assisted treatments and conventional procedures (use of scalpels) aiming to suggest the most suitable surgical protocol showing the lowest recurrence rate. A retrospective multicenter DATA collection between 1985 and 2019 covering 781 OSP cases concerning different surgical protocols used for the treatment of OSP was done and included the use of different laser wavelengths [neodymium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG), carbon dioxide (CO), and Diode 980 nm] and the conventional surgeries using the scalpel. The age, sex, and the oral location of the OSP were noted. Three different surgical protocols were selected in our study: protocol 1 regrouped surgical procedures performing the excision of OSP with an in-depth safety margin of 1 mm and just at the base of the tumor with reduced excision of the grossly normal marginal mucosa around the tumor (0-1 mm). Protocol 2 and 3 were similar to protocol 1, but with an additional excision of 1-2 mm and ≥3 mm of the grossly normal marginal mucosa, respectively, for group 2 and 3. All laser-treated OSP wounds were left without sutures. In the conventionally treated OSP, sutures were regularly performed. Follow-up was done after 15 days and at 1, 6, and 18 months. The three included wavelengths were Nd:YAG (1064 nm), CO laser (10,600 nm), and diode laser (980 nm). After 18 months of follow-up, the highest success rate was obtained with protocol 3 (100% with Nd:YAG, 99% with CO, 98.4% with diode, and 99% with the scalpel), which was significantly higher than the values of protocol 2 (96.6% with Nd:YAG, 91% with CO, 96% with diode, and 95% with the scalpel) and the protocol 1 (38% with Nd:YAG, 29% with CO, 33% with diode, and 30% with the scalpel). The oral locations of OSP were 30% on palates, 30% on the tongue, 16% on cheek, 14% on lips, and 10% on other locations. The lowest recurrence rate was observed when a minimum of three millimeters (≥3 mm) of grossly normal aspect mucosa around the OSP was included in the excisions. The laser wavelengths and the use of scalpel did not show any significant difference in terms of recurrence.
我们的回顾性研究旨在比较良性口腔鳞状乳头状瘤(OSP)不同激光辅助治疗与常规治疗(手术刀使用)的长期复发率,旨在提出复发率最低的最合适的手术方案。在 1985 年至 2019 年期间,我们进行了一项回顾性多中心 DATA 收集,涉及 781 例不同手术方案治疗 OSP 的病例,包括使用不同激光波长(掺钕钇铝石榴石(Nd:YAG)、二氧化碳(CO)和二极管 980nm)和常规手术(手术刀)。记录了 OSP 的年龄、性别和口腔位置。 在我们的研究中选择了三种不同的手术方案:方案 1 是在肿瘤基底处进行 OSP 切除,并进行 1mm 的安全深度切除,同时切除肿瘤周围肉眼正常的粘膜边缘(0-1mm)。方案 2 和 3 与方案 1 类似,但分别对肉眼正常的粘膜边缘进行 1-2mm 和≥3mm 的额外切除。所有激光治疗的 OSP 伤口均不缝合。在常规治疗的 OSP 中,常规进行缝合。在 15 天后和 1、6 和 18 个月进行随访。三种包括的波长是 Nd:YAG(1064nm)、CO 激光(10600nm)和二极管激光(980nm)。 在 18 个月的随访后,方案 3(Nd:YAG 为 100%、CO 为 99%、二极管为 98.4%、手术刀为 99%)的成功率最高,明显高于方案 2(Nd:YAG 为 96.6%、CO 为 91%、二极管为 96%和手术刀为 95%)和方案 1(Nd:YAG 为 38%、CO 为 29%、二极管为 33%和手术刀为 30%)。OSP 的口腔位置为 30%在腭部,30%在舌部,16%在颊部,14%在唇部,10%在其他部位。当 OSP 周围肉眼正常的粘膜至少切除 3 毫米(≥3mm)时,观察到最低的复发率。激光波长和手术刀的使用在复发方面没有显示出任何显著差异。