From the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD (STT); Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (RTS, EMB, ANH, PLL, AHK); University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA (CJH); University of Colorado, Boulder, CO (VJ).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Jan-Feb;34(1):113-122. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.01.200292.
In December 2013, cholesterol treatment guidelines changed the approach to statin therapy by recommending fixed doses of low-, medium-, or high-intensity statins based on cardiovascular risk. We sought to evaluate the guideline's adoption in a diverse group of practices.
Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyzed electronic health record data the year before and 2 years following guideline publication in 45 practices across 8 states. We examined associations based on patient, clinician, and practice characteristics and interviewed 24 clinicians and practice leaders to inform findings.
The proportion of patients adherent with all recommendations 2 years after the guideline only increased from 18.5% to 20.3% (). There were clinically insignificant increases in statin use across risk strata (1.7% to 3.5%) and small increases in high-intensity statin use (2.6% to 4.6%). Only half of patients with cardiovascular disease (52.9%) were on any statin, not much different from patients at moderate (49.6% to 50.9%) or low (41.6% to 48.7%) risk. Multiple patient (risk, use of health care), clinician (age), and practice (type, rurality) factors were associated with statin use. Clinicians reported patient resistance to statins but liked having a risk calculator to guide discussions.
Despite general agreement with statin benefit, the guideline was poorly implemented. Marginal differences in statin use between the highest and lower risk strata of patients is concerning. Rather than intensifying statin potency and recommending more patients take statins, guidelines may want to focus on ensuring that those who will benefit most get treatment.
2013 年 12 月,胆固醇治疗指南改变了他汀类药物治疗方法,根据心血管风险建议使用低、中、高强度他汀类药物固定剂量。我们试图在各种实践中评估该指南的采用情况。
我们使用混合方法,分析了指南发布前一年和发布后 2 年 8 个州 45 家实践的电子健康记录数据。我们根据患者、临床医生和实践特征进行了关联分析,并采访了 24 名临床医生和实践领导者,以了解发现情况。
指南发布后 2 年,所有建议的患者依从率仅从 18.5%增加到 20.3%()。风险分层的他汀类药物使用率略有增加(从 1.7%增加到 3.5%),高强度他汀类药物使用率略有增加(从 2.6%增加到 4.6%)。仅有一半的心血管疾病患者(52.9%)服用任何他汀类药物,与中度风险患者(49.6%至 50.9%)或低风险患者(41.6%至 48.7%)相比没有太大差异。多个患者(风险、使用医疗保健)、临床医生(年龄)和实践(类型、农村)因素与他汀类药物的使用有关。临床医生报告称患者对他汀类药物有抵触情绪,但他们喜欢使用风险计算器来指导讨论。
尽管普遍认为他汀类药物有益,但该指南执行情况不佳。患者风险最高和最低分层之间他汀类药物使用差异较小令人担忧。指南可能不希望通过加强他汀类药物的效力并建议更多患者服用他汀类药物,而是关注确保那些受益最大的患者得到治疗。