Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
College of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 May;46(6):1152-1160. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00940-0. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
Blunted and exaggerated neuronal response to rewards are hypothesized to be core features of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BD), respectively. Nonetheless, direct tests of this hypothesis, in which response between SZ and BD is compared in the same study, are lacking. Here we examined the functional correlates of reward processing during the Incentivized Control Engagement Task (ICE-T) using 3T fMRI. Reward-associated activation was examined in 49 healthy controls (HCs), 52 recent-onset individuals with SZ, and 22 recent-onset individuals with Type I BD using anterior cingulate (ACC), anterior insula, and ventral striatal regions of interest. Significant group X reward condition (neutral vs. reward) interactions were observed during reward anticipation in the dorsal ACC (F(2,120) = 4.21, P = 0.017) and right insula (F(2,120) = 4.77, P = 0.010). The ACC interaction was driven by relatively higher activation in the BD group vs. HCs (P = 0.007) and vs. individuals with SZ (P = 0.010). The insula interaction was driven by reduced activation in the SZ group relative to HCs (P = 0.018) and vs. people with BD (P = 0.008). A composite of reward anticipation-associated response across all associated ROIs also differed significantly by diagnosis (F(1,120) = 5.59, P = 0.02), BD > HC > SZ. No effects of group or group X reward interactions were observed during reward feedback. These results suggest that people with SZ and BD have opposite patterns of activation associated with reward anticipation but not reward receipt. Implications of these findings in regard to Research Domain Criteria-based classification of illness and the neurobiology of reward in psychosis are discussed.
奖赏相关反应迟钝和过度增强被假设为精神分裂症谱系障碍(SZ)和双相障碍(BD)的核心特征。然而,缺乏在同一研究中比较 SZ 和 BD 之间反应的直接检验。在这里,我们使用 3T fMRI 检查了在激励控制参与任务(ICE-T)期间奖赏处理的功能相关性。使用前扣带皮层(ACC)、前岛叶和腹侧纹状体的兴趣区,在 49 名健康对照者(HCs)、52 名首发 SZ 患者和 22 名首发 I 型 BD 患者中检查了与奖赏相关的激活。在奖赏预期期间观察到显著的组 X 奖赏条件(中性与奖赏)相互作用,在背侧 ACC(F(2,120) = 4.21, P = 0.017)和右侧岛叶(F(2,120) = 4.77, P = 0.010)。ACC 相互作用是由 BD 组与 HCs(P = 0.007)和 SZ 患者(P = 0.010)相比,激活相对较高驱动的。岛叶相互作用是由 SZ 组与 HCs(P = 0.018)和 BD 患者(P = 0.008)相比,激活减少驱动的。所有相关 ROI 奖赏预期相关反应的组合也因诊断而显著不同(F(1,120) = 5.59, P = 0.02),BD>HC>SZ。在奖赏反馈期间,未观察到组或组 X 奖赏相互作用的影响。这些结果表明,SZ 和 BD 患者在奖赏预期时的激活模式相反,但在奖赏接收时没有。讨论了这些发现对疾病基于研究领域标准的分类和精神病学中奖赏的神经生物学的影响。