Suppr超能文献

患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)是一种有效的患者报告结局指标,适用于接受前交叉韧带重建以及多韧带膝关节重建和修复手术的患者。

PROMIS is a Valid Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Patients undergoing ACL Reconstruction with Multi-ligament Knee Reconstruction and Repair Procedures.

作者信息

Baron Jacqueline E, Duchman Kyle R, Wolf Brian R, Westermann Robert W

机构信息

University of Iowa Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Iowa City, IA, 52246, United States.

University of Iowa Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Iowa City, IA, 52246, United States.

出版信息

Knee. 2021 Jan;28:294-299. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.12.012. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to (1) compare PROMIS with previously validated legacy instruments and (2) to assess between group differences of PROMIS PF-CAT [Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test] for patients undergoing isolated primary ACL reconstruction [ACLR] vs. primary ACL reconstruction with additional ligamentous intervention [MLIK].

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II; Prospective Cohort Study.

METHODS

At a single preoperative timepoint, 42 [MLIK] and 73[ACLR] patients completed: Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Mental (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) and Marx Knee Scale. Spearman correlation coefficients (non-parametric data) assessed correlations between PROMIS PF-CAT and legacy PROs [Patient-Reported Outcome instruments]. Floor and ceiling effects were assessed using chi-square tests. Between group differences were assessed (Wilcoxon Rank sum test).

RESULTS

PROMIS PF-CAT for the MLIK cohort [Table 2] demonstrated an excellent-good correlation with SF-36 Physical Function (PCS; r = 0.64, p < 0.01), EQ-5D (r = 0.68, p < 0.01), and KOOS Quality of Life (QOL) (r = 0.68, p < 0.01); good correlation with KOOS ADL (r = 0.52, p = 0.01), KOOS Sports (r = 0.44, p < 0.01), KOOS Pain (r = 0.44, p < 0.01) and WOMAC Function (r = 0.52,p = 0.01). PROMIS PF-CAT scores differed for ACL vs. MLIK cohorts (41.9 ± 6.6 vs. 37.6 ± 9.0, p < 0.01). PROMIS PF-CAT demonstrated the fewest floor and ceiling effects [Table 4] versus legacy PRO instruments.

CONCLUSION

PROMIS PF-CAT demonstrated strong correlations with previously validated PRO instruments and offers a favorable alternative for patients undergoing ACLR with MLIK repair/reconstruction procedures. Preoperative PROMIS PF-CAT scores were greater for patients undergoing primary ACLR versus MLIK intervention.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在(1)将患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)与先前经验证的传统工具进行比较,以及(2)评估单纯原发性前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)患者与接受额外韧带干预的原发性前交叉韧带重建(MLIK)患者之间PROMIS身体功能计算机自适应测试(PF-CAT)的组间差异。

证据水平

II级;前瞻性队列研究。

方法

在单一术前时间点,42例[MLIK]患者和73例[ACLR]患者完成了:简短健康调查36项(SF-36)心理(MCS)和身体成分总结(PCS)、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)、欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)和马克思膝关节量表。Spearman相关系数(非参数数据)评估PROMIS PF-CAT与传统患者报告结果工具(PROs)之间的相关性。使用卡方检验评估地板效应和天花板效应。评估组间差异(Wilcoxon秩和检验)。

结果

MLIK队列的PROMIS PF-CAT[表2]与SF-36身体功能(PCS;r = 0.64,p < 0.01)、EQ-5D(r = 0.68,p < 0.01)和KOOS生活质量(QOL)(r = 0.68,p < 0.01)表现出良好的相关性;与KOOS日常生活活动(ADL)(r = 0.52,p = 0.01)、KOOS运动(r = 0.44,p < 0.01)、KOOS疼痛(r = 0.44,p < 0.01)和WOMAC功能(r = 0.52,p = 0.01)具有良好相关性。ACLR队列与MLIK队列的PROMIS PF-CAT评分不同(41.9±6.6对37.6±9.0,p < 0.01)。与传统PRO工具相比,PROMIS PF-CAT表现出最少的地板效应和天花板效应[表4]。

结论

PROMIS PF-CAT与先前经验证的PRO工具表现出强相关性,为接受ACLR及MLIK修复/重建手术的患者提供了一个良好的替代方案。接受原发性ACLR的患者术前PROMIS PF-CAT评分高于接受MLIK干预的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验